Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

2.69s

  • United States v. German

    353 F. Supp. 1197 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1973

    Cale v. Volatile, 465 F.2d 1110 (3d Cir. 1972). … In United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Duckett v. US Parole Com'n

    795 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1992

    See Rookard v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, No. 86-3228 (D.D.C. Jan. 21, 1988). … In Harris v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kairo-Scibek v. Wyoming Valley West School District

    880 F. Supp. 2d 549 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2012

    As a result, the Wyoming Valley West School Board (Board) suspended Kairo-Scibek without pay at their next session on December 27, 2007. (SOF ¶ 59.) … Kairo-Scibek received notification of this suspension from the Board in a letter stating, “Please be advised, at the December 27, 2007 school board meeting, the Board of Directors passed a resolution to place you on suspension

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gomez v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement's Interim Field Office Director for Detention & Removal for the Philadelphia District

    315 F. Supp. 2d 630 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 2004

    Petitioner appealed the decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”), but the Board affirmed the Immigration Judge in an August 6, 2001 order. (Id.) … First, a district court reviews only the opinion of the Board and does not review both the Board’s and the Immigration Judge’s opinions. Abdulai v. Ashcroft, 239 F.3d 542, 549 (3d Cir.2001).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Litwhiler v. Hidlay

    429 F. Supp. 984 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1977

    State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969). A prospective-only application of a constitutional holding in a non-criminal context is not automatic. Linkletter v. … See Hanover Shoe v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 392 U.S. 481, 496 , 88 S.Ct. 2224 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1231 (1968); Allen v. State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544, 572 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. Pittston Area School District

    218 F. Supp. 3d 304 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2016

    of Education (the “Board”). … See Robb v. City of Philadelphia, 733 F.2d 286, 290-91 (3d Cir. 1984). Here, for purposes of § 1983, it is undisputed that Defendants, school board members, are state actors. See Daniels v. Sch.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Scranton v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.

    11 F. Supp. 986 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 4, 1935

    Perley v. Muskegon County, 32 Mich. 132 , 20 Am. Rep. 637 . See, also, State v. Bobleter, 83 Minn. 479 , 86 N. W. 461 .” In Hinton v. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fodor v. The Honorable Judge Jennifer Harlacher-Sibum

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2025

    See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (stating “[a] document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally construed’”) (citing Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976)); see also Wright v. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Ushery

    526 F. Supp. 2d 497 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 2007

    Defendant was transporting Chanika Brown (“Brown”) in the front passenger seat of the vehicle, which was registered to defendant’s father, Ronald Ushery. (Id. at 12-13, 26; see also Doc. 18-3 at 15.) … Brown also fled. (Id. at 26.) Defendant was apprehended three months later, and the charges in the in *501 stant case were filed against him. Brown is not subject to the present indictment. II.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Foster

    680 F. Supp. 712 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1987

    Michigan Canners and Freezers Assoc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Board, 467 U.S. 461, 469 , 104 S.Ct. 2518, 2523 , 81 L.Ed.2d 399 (1984) (quoting Hines v. … ’s purposes, and plainly indicated that the Board need not feel bound by existing state law.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Susquehanna Collieries Co.

    49 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1943

    The Susquehanna Collieries Company seeks, by this proceeding, to obtain an order compelling arbitration of a controversy upon which suit was brought in this Court in a case captioned Gerald Donahue v. … Paragraph IV of the Award of 1903 of the Anthracite coal Strike Commission which is incorporated by reference in the agreement of May 20, 1941, provides for a Board of Conciliation, and for the submission to that Board of

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gobla v. Crestwood School District

    628 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1985

    After a hearing, the Board of School Directors voted to dismiss plaintiff on November 1, 1978. … See e.g., Peterson v. Air Line Pilots Assoc. Internat., 759 F.2d 1161 (4th Cir.1985); Trio Process Corp. v. L. Goldstein’s Sons, Inc., 461 F.2d 66 (3d Cir.1972); Evans v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Gillen

    458 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 1978

    S. v. … See Nash v. U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. County of Lycoming

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 2022

    Brown v. Blaine, 833 A.2d 1166, 1173 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2003) (citation omitted). Mere conclusory allegations stating that there was a “conspiracy” or “an agreement to act unlawfully” will not suffice. … .; see also Brown v. Everett Cash Mut. Ins. Co., 157 A.3d 958, 967-68 (Pa. Super.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Geraghty v. United States Parole Commission

    552 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1982

    See Priore v. Nelson, 626 F.2d 211 (2d Cir.1980); Moore v. Nelson, 611 F.2d 434, 439 (2d Cir.1979), Hawkins v. … Parole Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Silberberg v. U. S. Parole Commission

    483 F. Supp. 1280 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1980

    Schoffner v. United States Board of Parole, 416 F.Supp. 759, 761 (M.D.Pa.1976), aff’d without opinion, 547 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1977). … See Drayton v. McCall, 584 F.2d 1208, 1214 (2d Cir. 1978); Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Yang v. Reno

    925 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1996

    Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 , 74 S.Ct. 499 , 98 L.Ed. 681 (1954) ( "Accardi I" ), and Shaughnessy v. U.S. ex rel. … McLeod v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 802 F.2d 89 , 95 n. 8 (3d Cir.1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wynne v. Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania

    639 F. Supp. 76 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1985

    Rochester v. … Healthy City School Board v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 573 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Northeastern Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. Sandvick Steel, Inc.

    325 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1971

    In Lucas et ux. v. … Marsh v. County School Board of Roanoke County, Va., 305 F.2d. 94 (4th Cir. 1962). The Pennsylvania Pure Streams Act does not afford a sufficient remedy to bar this action.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Keene v. Ice Machinery Independent Employees' Ass'n

    331 F. Supp. 1355 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1971

    United Bhd. of Carpenters, etc., 306 F.2d 152, 156 (3d Cir. 1962); Lewis v. Amer *1360 ican Fed. of State, County & Mun. Emp., 407 F.2d 1185 (3d Cir. 1969) n. 3; Axelrod v. Stoltz, 391 F.2d 549 (3d Cir. 1968); Depew v. … Sheridan v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, supra, 306 F.2d at 156-157 (Emphasis in original); See also, Lewis v. American Fed. of State, County & Mun.Emp., supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.