Case law

Pennsylvania Coal Mining Assoc. v. Watt

562 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1983

Steel v. Train, 556 F.2d 822 , 838-39 (7th Cir.1977) and Homestake Mining Co. v. *747 ERA, 477 F.Supp. 1279, 1282, 1283-84 (S.D. 1979). … Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. State National Resources Board, et al., 90 Wis.2d 656 , 280 N.W.2d 218 (1979). This would seem to include any discharges whereby pollutants are introduced into the water. In U.S. Steel v.

Bonin v. Gannon

494 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1980

See Sacks Brothers Loan Company, Inc. v. Cunningham, 578 F.2d 172 (7th Cir. 1978); Aluminum Company of America v. Department of Treasury of State of Michigan, 522 F.2d 1120 (6th Cir. 1975); Lung v. … In Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 344, n.7 , 96 S.Ct. 2074, 2077, n.7 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), the United States Supreme Court, citing Board of Regents v.

Watters v. Ralston Coal Co.

25 F. Supp. 387 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1938

Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112, 115 , 8 L.Ed. 885 . … Wetmore v. Rymer, 169 U.S. 115, 120 , 18 *388 S.Ct. 293, 42 L.Ed. 682 ; Guarantee Trust Company v. Codings, 3 Cir., 76 F.2d 870 , certiorari denied 295 U.S. 747 , 55 S.Ct. 825 , 79 L.Ed. 1692 .

Winter v. Pennsylvania State University

172 F. Supp. 3d 756 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2016

See Hill, 455 F.3d at 236 (citations omitted); Brown *766 v. … University of Chicago, 441 U.S. 677 , 99 S.Ct. 1946 , 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) (“Cannon”); (2) North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 , 102 S.Ct. 1912 , 72 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982) (“Bell”); and (3) Franklin v.

Jones v. Pittston Area School District

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2021

See, e.g., Doby v. DeCrescenzo, 171 F.3d 858, 868 (3d Cir. 1999) (citing Bielevicz v. Dubinon, 915 F.2d 845, 851 (3d Cir. 1990)). As summarized in Brown v. … Brown, 586 F.3d at 292-93.

United States v. Jackson

508 F. Supp. 2d 422 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2007

See United States v. … United States v. Brown, 3 F.3d 673 , 678 n. 5 (3d Cir.1993).

Mathis v. Rivello

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2025

(citations omitted)); Brown v. Kauffman, No. 18-cv-89, 2018 WL 4087551, at *4 (E.D. Pa. … Aug. 9, 2018) (“[S]ince the appropriate remedy would have been a new hearing before the Board, and because Brown has since had another hearing, any challenge to the prior denial is now moot.”

Harper v. National Flood Insurers Ass'n

494 F. Supp. 234 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1980

Taylor, 266 U.S. 200 [ 45 S.Ct. 47 , 69 L.Ed. 247 ]; Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 317 U.S. 239, 245 [ 63 S.Ct. 246, 250 , 87 L.Ed. 239 ]; Brown v. … Muniz v. Hoffman, Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board, 422 U.S. 454,468 , 95 S.Ct. 2178,2186 , 45 L.Ed.2d 319 (1975).

Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. Ultra Resources, Inc.

898 F. Supp. 2d 741 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2012

Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 292-93 (3d Cir.2012). … Alston v.

Amp, Inc. v. Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc.

853 F. Supp. 808 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1994

A circuit board connector can include a number of signal conductors, which actually relay electronic information between printed circuit boards. … the housing to the printed circuit board.”

Stitzell v. York Memorial Osteopathic Hospital

754 F. Supp. 1061 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1991

Citing, among other cases, Garbish v. … See Miller v. Indiana Hospital, 277 Pa.Super. 370 , 419 A.2d 1191 (1980). Defendants counter that the Board’s action was not a denial of a request for an increase in clinical privileges.

Padbury v. Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n

119 F. Supp. 738 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1954

It was held in Brown v. … And it was held in Everhart v. Huntsville Female College, 120 U.S. 223 , 7 S.Ct. 555 , 30 L.Ed. 623 , that an averment that a party is “of” or a “resident” or an “inhabitant” of a particular state is not sufficient.

Pennsylvania Medical Society v. Marconis

679 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1987

Board of Medicine’s Complaint at ¶¶ 31, 32. … In Burford v.

Rosenthal v. Heller

266 F. 563 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1920

Rep. 101), either by actual consent (Hicks v. Knost, 178 U. S. 541 , 20 Sup. Ct. 1006, 44 L. Ed. 1183 ), or by acquiescence. See Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Coke Co., 150 U. S. 371, 380, 381 , 14 Sup. Ct. 127, 37 L. … Ed. 1113 ; and Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co., 134 U. S. 530, 536 , 10 Sup. Ct. 604, 606 ( 33 L.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs Local 764 v. Greenawalt

919 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1996

There was no mention of the cash transaction in the Executive Board minutes, nor was it ever approved by the Executive Board or the union membership. … According to plaintiff, “Greenawait’s severance pay was not approved by the Board or reflected in the Executive Board meeting minutes.”

Jordan v. Arnold

408 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1976

Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 , 940 (3d Cir. 1969). However, conditions in segregation units can violate the Amendment if they fall below certain standards. See Knuckles v. … Id. at 526, citing Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 , 78 S.Ct. 590 , 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958). That test was used by this Court in Brown v.

Bonsall v. Gillis

372 F. Supp. 2d 805 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2005

Id.; see also DeFoy v. … Mickens-Thomas v.

Cochran v. Veneman

252 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2003

The DMI Board consists of an equal number of dairy farmers from the Dairy Board and the UDIA Board. Id. … See Gallo Cattle Company v.

Pa. Prof'l Liab. Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Wolf

381 F. Supp. 3d 324 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2018

Our point was not about who controlled the MMIA's board at any given time, but rather that the New York legislature had dictated the board's composition by statute (expressly reserving at least some seats for state appointees … ), whereas the MCARE Act left the question of board composition to the Association itself.

Borrell v. Bloomsburg University

955 F. Supp. 2d 390 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 2013

Hill, 455 F.3d at 236 (citations omitted); see also Brown v. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).