Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

1.40s

  • Smith v. Central Dauphin School District

    511 F. Supp. 2d 460 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2007

    See McKee v. Hart, 436 F.3d 165, 169 (3d Cir.2006); Brennan v. Norton, 350 F.3d 399, 419 (3d Cir.2003). … Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fink v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    646 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1986

    See Skehan v. Board of Trustees, 353 F.Supp. 542, 543 (M.D.Pa.1973). (Muir, J.). … Ethics Comm. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Goodwin v. Moyer

    549 F. Supp. 2d 621 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2006

    Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); White v. Napoleon, 897 F.2d 103, 106 (3d Cir.1990). In Nami v. … See RendellBaker v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Cellular Telephone Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Boad Buck Township

    127 F. Supp. 2d 635 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 2001

    The other case addressed by the court was Bell Atlantic Mobile Systems v. Zoning Hearing Board of Township of O’Hara, 550 Pa. 266 , 705 A.2d 427 (1997). … As the court in Sprint Spectrum L.P. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Witters v. Smith

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 2024

    (See Doc. 10 at 5 (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 210 (3d Cir. 2001) (emphasis in brief))). … See Brown, 269 F.3d at 211; see also Pettit v. New Jersey, No. 09-CV-3735, 2011 WL 1325614, at *5 (D. N.J.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Herrera v. Doe

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 2023

    See Reaves v. Pennsylvania Board of Prob. & Parole, 580 Fed.Appx. 49, 52 (3d Cir. 2014) (unpublished). … Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 402–03, 60 S.Ct. 907, 84 L.Ed. 1263 (1940); see also Nelson v. Brown, 2014 WL 1096189 at *7 (S.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Woolrich Woolen Mills v. United States

    178 F. Supp. 875 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1959

    United States v. Harmon, 10 Cir., 1953, 205 F.2d 919 , which involved the uncertainty of income accruing from cost plus fixed fee contracts. Irwin v. … See also, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Dumari Textile Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 897 ; Dally v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 1955, 227 F.2d 724 .

    Reversed by Woolrich Woolen Mills v. United States, 289 F.2d 444 (1961)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement's Interim Field Office Director for Detention & Removal for the Philadelphia District

    294 F. Supp. 2d 655 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 2003

    Sol v. INS, 274 F.3d 648, 651 (2d Cir.2001); Bowrin v. INS, 194 F.3d 483, 490 (4th Cir.1999); Chinchilla-Jimenez v. INS, 226 F.Supp.2d 680, 683 (E.D.Pa.2002). … As an initial matter, the Board is obligated to adhere to precedent of the federal circuit court of appeals for cases originating within that circuit. Abdulai v. Ashcroft, 239 F.3d 542, 553 (3d Cir.2001); Ladha v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hooker

    418 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1976

    Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 229 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973). … I conclude, therefore, that under the doctrine of United States v. Brown, supra, he lacks standing to challenge the search and seizure. Assuming, arguendo, that defendant has standing, he fares no better on the merits.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Capital Blue Cross

    796 F. Supp. 144 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1992

    New Jersey; Violent Crimes Compensation Board, 831 F.2d 458 (3d Cir.1987) and United States v. Maryland, 914 F.2d 551 (4th Cir.1990). … New Jersey; Violent Crimes Compensation Board, 831 F.2d 458 (3d Cir.1987) and United States v. Maryland, 914 F.2d 551 (4th Cir.1990).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Municipal Revenue Services, Inc. v. Xspand, Inc.

    537 F. Supp. 2d 740 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2008

    Machines Corp. v. Levin, 579 F.2d 271 , 283 (3d Cir.1978). … Price v. Admiral Ins. Co., 481 F.Supp. 374 (E.D.Pa.1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Penn State Hershey Medical Center

    185 F. Supp. 3d 552 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 2016

    The Hospitals signed a Letter of Intent of then' proposed merger in June of 2014, and received final board approval in March of 2015. (PX00643). … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 323 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). “Ephemeral possibilities” of anticompetitive effects are not sufficient to establish a violation of Section 7, United States v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Federal Trade Commission v. Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 838 F.3d 327 (2016)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zuck v. Pennsylvania Certified Organic

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2020

    See Sherman v. John Brown Ins. Agency Inc., 38 F. Supp. 3d 658, 662–63 (W.D. Pa. 2014). … P. 8. 14 See Thompson v. Real Estate Mortg. Network, 748 F.3d 142, 147 (3d Cir. 2014) (citing Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litigation

    674 F. Supp. 2d 580 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 2009

    Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516, 518 , 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 (1923) (concluding that no jurisdiction existed over a defendant that frequently entered the forum merely to purchase goods); Noonan v. … In fact, Chambers could not recall how many individuals comprise Cad- *616 bury USA’s board, could not identify a single board member, and could not remember attending any board meetings in person. 54 In contrast, he recollected

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Arnold v. Bache & Co., Inc.

    377 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1973

    The Milnarik rationale was expressly adopted by this Court in its prior memorandum and order in Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. 1066 supra. … See Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. 1066 supra; Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co., 291 F.Supp. 705 (D.Minn.1968). 5 .

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Wilkinson

    129 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1955

    In Hiatt v. … Wilson, 340 U.S. 137 , 73 S.Ct. 1045 , 97 L.Ed. 1508 ; Suttles v. Davis, 10 Cir., 215 F.2d 700 . . Suttles v. Davis, supra; Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U.S. 103 , 70 S.Ct. 495 , 94 L.Ed. 691 . . See also, Schilder v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Steele

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2025

    Zimmerman v. Corbett, 873 F.3d 414, 417-18 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Allah v. Al–Hafeez, 226 F.3d 247, 249 (3d Cir. 2000)). … Taking the allegation in the pleadings as true, Brown was injured by a dangerous dog as defined by the Pennsylvania Dog Law. See Zimmerman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Application of Santos

    400 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1975

    Schultz v. Brierly, 449 F.2d 1286, 1287 (3d Cir. 1971); Osborn v. Russell, 434 F.2d 650, 651 (3d Cir. 1970). The Supreme Court made it clear in Brown v. … In Brown v. Illinois, the Supreme Court elaborated on the principle it first announced in Wong Sun . The facts of the Brown case are briefly as follows.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Merwine v. Berdanier

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2021

    MERWINE, WILLIE JAMES BROWN, : Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-1427 v. … Nyhuis v. Reno, 204 F.3d 65, 75-76 (3d Cir. 2000). Courts have typically required across-the-board administrative exhaustion by inmates who seek to pursue claims in federal court. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Keyser v. Commonwealth National Financial Corp.

    644 F. Supp. 1130 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1986

    See e.g., Rodman v. … See Gearhart v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.