Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

0.47s

  • Hock v. Hagan

    190 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1960

    “The Board may then, or at any time in its discretion, revoke the order of parole and terminate such parole or modify the terms and conditions thereof.” In Moore v. … In Robbins v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Craft v. Attorney General of United States

    379 F. Supp. 538 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1974

    Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, CA2, 500 F.2d 925 (1974). … United States Board of Parole, Civil No. 73-601 (M.D.Pa.), p. 3, that such a reason is adequate. In light of the decisions in Wolff v. McDonnell, supra, and Johnson v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II

    911 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 1996

    Whiting v. … McKnight v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Bailey

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2025

    Vaughn, 296 F.3d 138, 146 (3d Cir. 2002) (quoting O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 844-45 (1999)); see also Johnson v. … On September 23, 2025, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided Lincoln v. Pennsylvania Parole Board,42 a case that performs much of the heavy lifting for Bailey’s ex post facto claim.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Beer & Pop Warehouse v. Jones

    41 F. Supp. 2d 552 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1999

    See Beer & Pop Warehouse, Inc. v. Jones, No. 97 Civ. 753, slip op. at 11 (M.D.Pa. Oct. 17, 1997) (citing Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943)). … In Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2023

    We refer to these cases as Riverkeeper I through Riverkeeper V. See Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Sec’y Pa. Dep’t of Env’t Prot., 833 F.3d 360 (3d Cir. 2016) (“Riverkeeper I”); Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Sec’y of Pa. … See Issa v. Sch. Dist. of Lancaster, 847 F.3d 121, 131 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Ferring Pharm., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Foddrell v. Sigler

    418 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 1976

    Grattan v. Sigler, 525 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1975). … Barradale v. United States Board of Paroles & Pardons, 362 F.Supp. 338 (M.D.Pa.1973).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Clinton County Correctional Facility

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2022

    When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. '636(b)(1); Brown v. … See e.g., Brown v. Monsalud, 2021 WL 4502238 (M.D.Pa., Sept. 30, 2021); Coit v. Luther, 2020 WL 4260765 (M.D.Pa., July 24, 2020).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Consolidated Car Heating Co. v. Lehigh Traction Co.

    51 F.2d 588 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1931

    Hunt, Helm, Ferris & Co. v. Milwaukee Hay Tool Co., 148 F. 220 , 78 C. C. A. 116 ; Brown Hoisting & Conveying Mach. Co. v. King Bridge Co., 107 F. 498 , 46 C. C. A. 432 ; Walker on Patents (6th Ed.) pages 314, etc. … After a hearing before the Board of Examiners the patent was allowed because of the simplicity of the construction and because the use of glass in place of metal lowered the heat conductivity of the easing.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Mechling

    541 F. Supp. 2d 651 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2008

    In Nara v. … As she approached the alley, Williams told Brown to keep going. (N.T. 107.) Brown walked a few feet beyond the alley when she heard a loud boom and ran. (N.T. 109-10.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Grant v. Sullivan

    131 F.R.D. 436 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1990

    Wetzel v. … See Hummel v. Heckler, 736 F.2d 91 at 93-95 (3rd Cir.1984). Grant v. Sullivan, 720 F.Supp. at 470 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Stroud v. Weger

    380 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1974

    Grasso v. Norton, D.Conn. 1974, 371 F.Supp. 171 . The Board’s parole decision-making guidelines, 39 Fed. … See Grasso v. Norton, D.Conn. 1974, 376 F.Supp. 116 . In Grasso v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Kocher v. Larksville Borough

    926 F. Supp. 2d 579 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2013

    (citations omitted); see also Brown v. … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205 , 211-12 n. 4 (3d Cir.2001).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Wolfe v. Wetzel

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2021

    Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979); see also Burkett v. … In re Brown, 382 F. App’x 150, 150-51 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing In re Tennant, 359 F.3d 523, 531 (D.C. Cir. 2004)). Instead, Wolfe must turn to state courts if he seeks a writ of mandamus against state officials.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thompson v. Smeal

    54 F. Supp. 3d 339 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2014

    Lastly, even if the communal meals were limited to browns-only, the parties dispute the number of browns who would be eligible for the meals. … Sharp, 669 F.3d at 156 (quoting Jones v. Brown, 461 F.3d 353, 360-61 (3d Cir.2006) (alterations omitted)). 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • USX Corp. v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry

    643 F. Supp. 1567 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1986

    Brown, Deputy Secretary for Employment Security, and R. … of Review (Board) and the hearings, before a referee, have been scheduled for October 15, 16, 17, 1986.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Montemuro

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2026

    Brown v. Bd. of Ed. of Topeka, Shawnee Cnty., Kan., 347 U.S. 483, 493 (1954). … Forfeited issues can be reached in “truly | ‘exceptional circumstances’ ” Id. at 147 (quoting Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 | F.3d 789, 799 (3d Cir. 2001)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District

    379 F. Supp. 2d 680 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2005

    Second, in Alexander v. … See, e.g., Pinkard v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Messerman

    128 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1955

    Richter v. United States, 9 Cir., 181 F.2d 591 . … United States v. Niles, D. C., 122 F.Supp. 382 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Assaf v. Fields

    999 F. Supp. 622 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1998

    Brown v. Trench, 787 F.2d 167 (3d Cir.1986). … See Brown, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.