Case law

Stevenson v. Pennsylvania State Police

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 2023

See Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. … App’x 193, 196- 97 (3d Cir. 2014) (nonprecedential) (citing, inter alia, Stewart, 120 F.3d at 432) (same); Anderson v. Wachovia Mortg. Corp., 621 F.3d 261, 267-68 (3d Cir. 2010) (citing, inter alia, Brown v. J.

Coca-Cola Co. v. Brown

60 F.2d 319 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1932

In Coca-Cola Company v. Brown & Allen (D. C.) 274 F. 481, 482 , the court said: “He may also sweeten it by adding sugar, if that is desired by his customer, or he may similarly add anything else the customer desires. … In Elgin National Watch Company v. Illinois Watch Case Company, 179 U. S. 665 , 21 S. Ct. 270, 274 , 45 L.

Brown v. Access Midstream Partners, L.P.

141 F. Supp. 3d 323 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2015

Brown filed the instant action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated. (Doc. 1). An amended complaint was filed on August 22, 2014, which was brought by James L. Brown and Alice R. … Brown on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated. (Doc. 57).

Brown v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.

25 B.R. 319 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1982

The Browns owned real estate encumbered by a Beneficial mortgage with a balance of $3,925.00, which mortgage was junior to a judicial lien.

Morgan v. Social Security Board

45 F. Supp. 349 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1942

Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 294, 315 , 53 S.Ct. 350, 358 , 77 L.Ed. 796 ; Womack v. Consolidated Timber Co., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 625, 632 . … Bailey v. Holland, 4 Cir., 126 F.2d 317 ; Thompson v. Consolidated Gas. Utilities Corp., 300 U.S. 55, 69 , 57 S.Ct. 364 , 81 L.Ed. 510 .

Bey

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2026

See, e.g., Browne v. Equifax Info. Servs. LLC, No. 23-cv-00064, 2024 WL 4315119, at *5 (N.D. Ind. … See, e.g., Brown v. Iowa, 152 F.R.D. 168, 174 (S.D. Iowa 1993) (“[T]he Assistant Attorney General failed to even file a resistance to Brown’s and Andre’s motion to compel.

Skehan v. Board of Trustees

501 F. Supp. 1360 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1980

Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 496 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979). The Defendants, relying on Buxton v. … At the time this case was filed, the Supreme Court had decided Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) and Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972).

Brown v. Pennsylvania State Department of Health

514 F. Supp. 2d 675 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2007

See Fine v. … Harold Glenn Brown went by the name Glenn. (Doc. 53 V 23; Doc. 59 ¶ 23.) 3 . In his affidavit, plaintiff asserts that "Bittle told me, in April 2004, that she is my birth mother.” (Doc. 60, Ex. 5 ¶ 3.)

Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade

352 F. Supp. 1066 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1972

C. v. Howey, supra, 328 U.S. at 298 , 66 S.Ct. at 1103 . And, in Tcherepnin v. … See Milnarik v. M-S Commodities, supra 320 F.Supp. at 1150 ; Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co., supra 291 F.Supp. at 707 .

Berry v. United States Parole Board

266 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1967

“And, of course, the determination of a parole eligibility date is wholly within the discretion of the Board of Parole.” Walker v. Taylor, 338 F.2d 945, 946 (10 Cir. 1964). … It appears that Berry forgets that the discretionary power of granting paroles rests with the Parole Board, not the individual prisoners. In Peterson v. Rivers, 121 U.S.App.

Taylor v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole

263 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1967

The first question is whether the Pennsylvania Board of Parole is a “person” within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The definition of a “person” was considered in Monroe v. … Lee v. People of Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (7th Cir. 1965).

Choice v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole

448 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1977

Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 (1953); United States ex rel. Geisler v. Walters, 510 F.2d 887, 892 (3d Cir. 1975); United States ex el. Schultz v. … Heacock v. Myers, 251 F.Supp. 773 (E.D.Pa.1966), aff’d per curiam, 367 F.2d 583 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 925 , 87 S.Ct. 900 , 17 L.Ed.2d 797 (1967); United States ex rel. Brown v.

Brown v. Monroy

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2025

Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. … P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see Henderson v.

Dudley v. Brown

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2019

See Knight v. Wapinsky, No. 12-cv-2023, 2013 WL 786339, at *3 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2013) (stating that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. … If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, the Court will proceed on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Brown and Rowe and direct Defendants Brown and Rowe

Wiley v. United States Board of Parole

380 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1974

Board of Regents v. Roth, 1972, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 . In Scarpa v. … United States Board of Parole, 7 Cir. 1973, 484 F.2d 948 ; Mosley v. Ashby, 3 Cir. 1972, 459 F.2d 477 ; Madden v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 3 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1189 ; United States ex rel. Bey v.

Brickell v. Clinton County Prison Board

658 F. Supp. 2d 621 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2009

See, e.g., Bayer v. … .”); Maldonado v.

Brown v. News Group Publications, Inc.

563 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1983

Kyle v. … Kisko v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 408 F.Supp. 984 (M.D.Pa. 1976).

Luzerne County Retirement Board v. Makowski

627 F. Supp. 2d 506 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 2007

The October 1, 2002 Board Meeting...............................537 U. The Board Liquidates the Fund’s Investments.........................538 V. … V.

Sweeney v. State Board of Public Assistance

36 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1940

Reno, because he is not a member of the State Public Assistance Board, but the motion of the State. Public Assistance Board to dismiss the complaint against them was denied: Sweeney et al. v. … Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U.S. 151 , 52 S.Ct. 69 , 76 L.Ed. 214 ; West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 , 57 S.Ct. 578 , 81 L.Ed. 703 , 108 A.L.R. 1330 .

Brown v. Harry

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 2025

v. … Brown's claims against Correctional Officer McClelland, Unit Manager Spieles, and PSS Kalsky are not plausible. Brown never alleges each defendant's personal role in the alleged harm. See Odoley v.