Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspamd

4,649 results

1.76s

  • LYONS v. WETZEL

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 2025

    Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … Rahman v. Gartley, No. CV 3:23-363, 2024 WL 555894, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2024) (citing United v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lopez v. Wetzel

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 2024

    When objections are timely filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court must review de novo those portions of the report to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Brown v. … Bynum v. Colvin, 198 F. Supp 3d 434, 437 (E.D. Pa. 2016) (citing United Stated v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Seabrook v. Cox

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 2021

    v. … Rieder v. Apfel, 115 F. Supp. 2d 496, 499 (M.D. Pa. 2000) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Line

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2026

    Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … Rahman v. Gartley, No. CV 3:23-363, 2024 WL 555894, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2024) (citing United v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 676 (1980)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ranalli v. Baltazar

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2020

    Code § 63.3 (“If the parolee violates the conditions of parole, at a time during his period on parole, the Board may cause his detention or return to a correctional institution.”); Martin v. … Barden v. Keohane, 921 F.2d 476, 478 (3d Cir. 1990); Harris v. Zickefoose, 511 F. App’x 135, 137 (3d Cir. 2013). The BOP is afforded “wide discretion” in consideration of such an application.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Strode v. Franklin County Jail

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 2021

    See Jones v. Brown, 461 F.3d 353, 358 (3d Cir. 2006) (quoting Bieregu v. Reno, 59 F.3d 1445, 1452 (3d Cir. 1995), overruled on other grounds by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996)). … See Gibson v. Erickson, 830 F. App’x 372, 373 (3d Cir. 2020) (citing Brown, 461 F.3d at 359 and Bieregu, 59 F.3d at 1452); see also Davis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hering v. Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.

    341 F. Supp. 3d 412 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2018

    Richardson , 829 F.3d at 278 -79 (quoting Brown v. Phila. Hous. Auth. , 350 F.3d 338 , 343 (3d Cir. 2003) ). The law has evolved somewhat on this issue. … United States v. Territory of V.I. , 748 F.3d 514 , 519 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Harris v. Pernsley , 820 F.2d 592 , 596 (3d Cir. 1987) ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bridges ex rel. D.B. v. Scranton School District

    66 F. Supp. 3d 570 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2014

    She would also write his name on the board for no reason, such as when his name was put on the board because he brought in a snack that Mrs. Wilcha did not like. (Id. at 22:3-19.) Mrs. … Wilcha testified, though, that his name was never written on the board for having an unhealthy snack. (Mrs. Wilcha Dep., 47:5-14.) Mrs.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Huston v. Stauffer

    496 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 2, 1980

    Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 501 F.2d 31 , 42-43 n. 7 (1974), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 421 U.S. 983 , 95 S.Ct. 1986 , 44 L.Ed.2d 474 (1975); accord, O’Neill v. … Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 313 , 25 L.Ed. 667 (1880); Watkins v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, 183 F.2d 440 (8th Cir. 1950); Wilcox v. Horan, 178 F.2d 162 (10th Cir. 1949); Mason v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ryer v. Harrisburg Kohl Bros.

    315 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1970

    v. … Normally, as expressed in Harris v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bassi v. Mount Airy, No. 1. LLC

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2024

    Brown v. Phillip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001). … Hall, 570 F.2d at 92.° Brown v. Phillip Morris Inc. is also instructive.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Korth v. Hoover

    190 F. Supp. 3d 394 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2016

    Brown v. … Roskos v. Sugarloaf Township, 295 F.Supp.2d 480, 492 (M.D.Pa, 2003); Brown v. Muhlenberg Township, 269 F.3d 205, 214 (3d Cir.2001).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Matter of Grand Jury

    469 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1978

    Brown, Carbondale, Pa., for Thomas J. Gillen. John Shearburn, Atty., Antitrust Div., Dept. of Justice, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg, Pa., George N. … Industries, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Sears v. McCoy

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2021

    Plaintiff did not keep the “brown foreign object” as evidence. (Id. ¶ 10.) … Plaintiff discovered the “dark brown colored foreign object in his food.” (Id. ¶ 60.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Russell v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.

    305 F.R.D. 78 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2015

    See, e.g., McManaway v. … Roth v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • DANCE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2023

    Affs. v. … See Hill v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bloomsburg Landlords Ass'n v. Town of Bloomsburg

    912 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1995

    Farley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Merion Township, 636 A.2d 1232, 1236 (Pa.Cmwlth.Ct.1994). … court eliminated all the Planning Board’s conditions.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Beck v. Athens Building Loan & Savings Ass'n

    65 F.R.D. 691 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1974

    In light of Collins v. Main Line Board of Realtors, 452 Pa. 342 , 304 A.2d 493 (1973), and Buchanan v. … Moreover, in light of Buchanan v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hines v. Shaner Hotels

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 2022

    v. … Wilson v. MVM, Inc., 475 F.3d 2. The R&R (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED for the reasons set forth therein. 3.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DeMarinis v. Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.

    District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 2024

    of the pension boards’ decisions. … Similarly, Pinto noted that ‘inconsistent treatment of the same facts [is] viewed with suspicion.” 214 F.3d at 393 (citing Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.