Case law

Ashford v. Crull

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 2024

: Plaintiff, : : (Judge Munley) v … V. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT: 1.

Brozusky Ex Rel. Brozusky v. Hanover Tp.

222 F. Supp. 2d 606 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 20, 2002

Pennsylvania House, Inc. v. Barrett, 760 F.Supp. 439, 449-50 (M.D.Pa.1991) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 45 — 46, 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)); see Brown v. … In Pahler v.

Powell v. Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency

563 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1983

[r]elying on Johnson v. … Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 264 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1052 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978); Smith v. Heath, 691 F.2d 220, 226 (6th Cir. 1982). See Basista v. Weir, 340 F.2d 74, 84-88 (3d Cir.1965).

United States v. One Bally "Barrel-O-Fun" Coin-Operated Gaming Device

224 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1963

The score board of each machine is a vertical plate glass facing the player from the opposite end of the playing area. It contains six bingo cards. … National Labor Relations Board, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179 , 184 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1950); Circle Discount Corporation v. United States, 211 F.Supp. 743 (D.D.C. 1962).

Robzen's Inc. v. US Dept. of Housing

515 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1981

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Investment Company Institute, - U.S. -, - & n.21, 101 S.Ct. 973 , 980-982 & n.21, 67 L.Ed.2d 36 & n.21 (1981). … See United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz, - U.S. -, -, 101 S.Ct. 453, 459-61 , 66 L.Ed.2d 368 (1980). 16 . The plaintiff asserts that appropriate compensation would amount to $767,537.00.

Moeck v. Pleasant Valley School District

983 F. Supp. 2d 516 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2013

Berg v. Cnty. of Allegheny, 219 F.3d 261, 276 (3d Cir.2000) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … Pennsylvania state law places final policymaking authority for the management, supervision, control or prohibition of exercise, athletics or games of any kind to board of school directors, not to the coach of the sport. 24

Smith v. Wambaugh

887 F. Supp. 752 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 1995

Brown v. Johnston, 675 F.Supp. 287, 290-91 (W.DJPa. 1987). Nor does it require the plaintiff to demonstrate lack of probable cause for initiating the underlying proceedings. Junod v. … See e.g., Brown, 675 F.Supp. at 290-91 . Cf.

In re Kravitz

471 F. Supp. 665 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1979

Paul Gernert, Chairman of the parole board, testified that the board would not, and did not, process her parole application while litigation on her conviction was pending. (N.T. 95). … In the more recent case of Stradley v.

Brittain

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2025

Specifically, the specter of a substantive due process violation is raised only when “a parole board considers a factor that ‘shocks the conscience.’”” Holmes v. … Ct. 2017) (recounting that Parole Board expressly informed inmate that they would consider the affidavit of probable cause from his prior conviction); Sowers v. Pa.

BALL v. BOHENSKI

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2025

Greenholtz v. Inmates of Neb. Penal & Corr. Complex, 442 U.S. 1, 7 (1979); see also Burkett v. … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003).

Citizens Savings Ass'n v. Franciscus

656 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1986

Twelve of these documents are monthly reports submitted by defendant Kauffman to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board from January 1983 through December 1983. … See Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc., 621 F.Supp. 1547 (N.D.Ill.1985); and Eaby v. Richmond, supra.

US Ex Rel. Fitzpatrick v. US PAROLE COM'N

444 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1978

In Moody v. … See also Williams v. United States Board of Parole, No. 77-510 (M.D. Pa. August 17, 1977). Therefore, the only disputed question at the revocation hearing was whether parole revocation was indicated.

DiNapoli v. United States Parole Commission

538 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1982

Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals, 522 F.2d 581 (3d Cir. 1975). … United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976); United States v. Frederick, 405 F.2d 129 (3d Cir. 1968). Silberberg, 483 F.Supp. at 1283 .

Simpson, Jr. v. Dept. of Transportation

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 2022

Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 483 (E.D. Pa. 2013). … See Brown, 977 F. Supp. 2d at 483.

Holt v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State Police Dept

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2020

See Alliance for Global Justice v. District of Columbia, No. 01—00811 (PLF/JMF), 2005 WL 1799558, (D.D.C. July 29, 2005); Bardoff v. United States, 628 A.2d 86 (D.C. 1993); Davis v. … With respect to Brown, the plaintiff has alleged that he emailed Brown on April 25, 2015, regarding complaints of discrimination and retaliation, but failed to receive a positive response.

Swanger v. Warrior Run Sch. Dist.

346 F. Supp. 3d 689 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 2018

See Brown v. Sch. Dist. of Philadelphia , 456 F. … See Brown v. Sch.

Bagby v. Beal

439 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1977

Elizabeth V. … In Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 344 n. 7, 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976), the Supreme Court, citing Board of Regents v.

Krevsky v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.

85 F. Supp. 2d 479 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 2000

See Snow v. Jesse L. Riddle, P.C., 143 F.3d 1350, 1353 (10th Cir.1998); Duffy, 133 F.3d at 1123-24; Brown v. Budget Rent-A-Car Sys., 119 F.3d 922, 924-25 (11th Cir.1997); Charles, 119 F.3d at 741-42 ; see also Romea v. … See Pollice v.

Hawley v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

514 F. Supp. 2d 650 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 2007

In Court v. … In Lambert v.

Gladysz v. United States

100 F. Supp. 205 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1951

Grimes v. Yellow Cab Co., 344 Pa. 298, 303 , 25 A.2d 294 ; Byrne v. Schultz, 306 Pa. 427, 431 , 160 A. 125 ; see Papkin v. … Brown v. Jones, 138 Pa.Super. 350, 353, 354 , 10 A.2d 839 . Here however the driver of the taxicab looked to the right and to .the left before and after entering the intersection.