Case law

Pennsylvania Motor Truck Ass'n v. Port of Philadelphia Marine Terminal Ass'n

183 F. Supp. 910 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 1960

pending the Board’s action, General American Tank Car Corp. v. … Federal Maritime Board v. Isbrandtsen Co., 356 U.S. 481 , 78 S.Ct. 851 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 926 ; Rivoli Trucking Corp. v. American Export Lines, Inc., D.C.E.D.N.Y. 1958, 167 F.Supp. 937 ; Rivoli Trucking Corp. v.

FREEMAN v. EMPLOYEES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 2024

Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 244-45 (3d Cir. 2013)). … Garrett v. Wexford Health, 938 F.3d 69, 91 (3d Cir. 2019).

Jones v. Johnson

402 F. Supp. 992 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1975

v. … Nuble v. Boor, Civil No. 74-1708 (E.D.Pa., Oct. 9, 1975); Reiff v. Commonwealth, 397 F.Supp. 345 (D.C.Pa.1975). See also, Cruz v. Skelton, 502 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1974); Joyce v.

Wolk Law Firm v. United States

371 F. Supp. 3d 203 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 2019

McDonnell , 4 F.3d at 1241 ; Lame v. U.S. … In McGilvra v. National Transportation Safety Board , 840 F.Supp. 100 (D. Colo. 1993), cited by the NTSB, the court faced a FOIA request for the CVR tape from an aircraft crash.

Rubin Quinn Moss Heaney & Patterson, P.C. v. Kennel

832 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1993

By the end of May 1986, Defendant had obtained the approval of Rubin Quinn to open five accounts at Brown Bros, (collectively, the “Brown Bros. … Jerrold V.

Delgado v. McTighe

442 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1977

Woodard v. Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, 420 F.Supp. 211, 212 (E.D.Va.1976); Parrish v. Board of Commissioners of Alabama State Bar, 533 F.2d 942, 949 (5th Cir. 1976). See also, Richardson v. … Accord, Doe v. Pringle, 550 F.2d 596 (10th Cir. 1976); Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 438 F.2d 699 (8th Cir. 1971); Chaney v. State Bar of California, 386 F.2d 962 (9th Cir. 1967); Nordstrom v.

Burgess v. Roth

387 F. Supp. 1155 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1975

Was the Board’s Policy of Hand-Delivering Release Orders Unreasonable ? As Mr. Justice Douglas, writing for the majority, said in Monroe v. … In Earnest v.

Fullman v. Henderson

146 F. Supp. 2d 688 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 15, 2001

See, e.g., Brown v. … See Brown v. General Serv. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Gissen v. Tackman, 537 F.2d 784, 786 (3d Cir.1976).

PEIFER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2023

Young v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 575 U.S. 206, 229 (2015). … See Tunis v. City of Newark, 184 Fed.

Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn

217 F. Supp. 2d 570 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2002

Citing Coady v. … Voss v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 788 A.2d 1107 , 2001 WL 1584398 (Pa.Cmwlth.2001).

United States v. Little

314 F. Supp. 3d 647 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2018

Browne's office. … United States v.

Langoma Lumber Corp. v. United States

140 F. Supp. 460 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1955

In Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. National Labor Relations Board, 1938, 305 U.S. 197 , at page 230, 59 S.Ct. 206 , at page 217, 83 L.Ed. 126 , the Supreme Court, speaking through Mr. … Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 93 F.2d 985, 989 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, 6 Cir., 97 F.2d 13, 15 ; Ballston-Stillwater Knitting Co. v.

BROWN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2026

June 25, 2026 Plaintiffs Andrew Brown and HC Composites LLC, Inc. … See Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg.

Knoll v. Phoenix Steel Corporation

325 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1971

However, neither of these courses of action is appropriate if the Board’s interpretation of the contract was correct. And the Board should be allowed some scope of discretion in interpreting the contract. Roark v. … More on point is Smith v.

Richardson v. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital

838 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1993

Additionally, JFK Hospital was administered by the board of trustees of the Fund, and, like the Fund, Earl Stout substantially controlled the hospital’s activities. 8 See United States v. … See Browne v. Maxfield, 663 F.Supp. 1193, 1197-98 (E.D.Pa.1987).

Ambrek v. Clark

287 F. Supp. 208 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1968

Board of Parole, 234 F.Supp. 368 (E.D.Pa.1964); Forward v. Gernert and Penna. Board of Parole, 287 F.Supp., 680 , Memorandum and Order by Body, J., May 8, 1968. B. … Board of Parole, 415 Pa. 90 , 202 A.2d 98 (1964); Commonwealth ex rel. Hill v. Burke, 165 Pa.Super. 583 , 69 A.2d 169 (1950). See also Kinsella v.

Alston v. Nat'l Conference of Bar Exam'rs

314 F. Supp. 3d 620 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2018

Co. v. … Review & Accrediting Council , 415 Fed.Appx. 411 , 414 (3d Cir. 2011) (holding that the National Board of Medical Examiners was not a state actor); Munsif v.

Koelker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

140 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 1956

Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 1950, 339 U.S. 239 , 70 S.Ct. 577 , 94 L.Ed. 795 ; Order of Ry. Conductors v. Southern Ry. Co., 1950, 339 U.S. 255 , 70 S.Ct. 585 , 94 L.Ed. 811 ; Lee v. Virginian Ry. … If made on the merits, the decision of the Board is final. Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 3 Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 623 .

Dutterer v. Thomas Kalperis International, Inc.

767 F. Supp. 2d 504 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 2011

Martin v. LaSalle Bank, N.A, 629 F.3d 364, 367-68 (3d Cir.2011). Courts broadly construe the FDCPA to effect its remedial purpose. Rosenau v. Unifund Corp., 539 F.3d 218, 221 (3d Cir.2008) (citing Brown v. Card Serv. … Rosenau, 539 F.3d at 221 (citing Brown, 464 F.3d at 454; Wilson v. Quadramed Corp., 225 F.3d 350, 354 (3d Cir.2000)).

King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

88 F. Supp. 3d 402 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2015

Brown Univ. in Providence in State of R.I., 5 F.3d 658 , 668 n. 8 (3d Cir.1993) (remarking that the rule of reason analysis has largely remained unchanged since it was first defined in Chicago Board of Trade v. … Dental Ass’n v. Med. Svc. Ass’n of Pa., 745 F.2d 248, 255 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Chicago Board of Trade, 246 U.S. at 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 ).