Case law

LANZILOTTI v. SAUL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 2022

(quoting Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 197 n.2 (3d Cir. 2011)). Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate how Dr. … Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Renchenski v. Williams, 622 F.3d 315, 341 (3d Cir. 2010). Stated differently, “remand is not required . . .

Fishman v. De Meo

604 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1985

The court reviewed its then-recent decision in Glus v. G.C. … See Coleman v.

Guinan v. A.I. Dupont Hospital for Children

597 F. Supp. 2d 517 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2009

Brown, 373 F.2d 771, 777 (3d Cir.1967)); First State Underwriters Agency of New England Reinsurance Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 803 F.2d 1308, 1316 (3d Cir.1986) (citing Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. … Co. v.

Canty v. City of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Philadelphia Domestic Relations Division Child Support Enforcement Units I & II

99 F. Supp. 2d 576 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 2000

Tziatzios v. U.S., 164 F.R.D. 410, 411, 412 (E.D.Pa.1996) citing Celotex v. Catrett, supra, 477 U.S. at 325 , 106 S.Ct. at 2553-54 , Anderson v. … Brown v. Smythe, 780 F.Supp. 274, 282 (E.D.Pa.1991).

Marine Towing Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

225 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1963

In Laros v. … See Kline v. Kachmar, 360 Pa. 396, 403 , 61 A.2d 825 (1948); see, also, Sullivan v. New York, L. E. & W. R.

Matthew for Butler v. Bowen

640 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1986

Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474, 490 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 466 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Cotter v. Harris, 642 F.2d 700, 605 (3d Cir.1981); Smith v. Califano, 637 F.2d 968 (3d Cir.1981). … In Adens for Green v.

Porter v. Garrity

65 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1946

Yakus v. United States, 1944, 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Meyers, 4 Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 440 . … O’Neal v. United States, 6 Cir., 140 F.2d 908 , certiorari denied 322 U.S. 729 , 64 S.Ct. 945 , 88 L.Ed. 1565 ; Carter v.

Reed v. Weeks Marine, Inc.

166 F. Supp. 2d 1052 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 2001

At the time of the accident, Plaintiff was working as a crew member on board Defendant’s Scow 222 in the navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay. … Myers v. American Dental Association, 695 F.2d 716, 724 (3d Cir.1982); Freddo v. United States, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9316 at *3 (E.D.Pa.2001); Taylor & Francis Group, PLC v. McCue, 145 F.Supp.2d 627, 629 (E.D.Pa.2001).

FATA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2024

Corp. v. … See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cooperman

243 F. Supp. 3d 597 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2017

See S.E.C. v. … C. v.

Burton v. Bowen

704 F. Supp. 599 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1989

Lewis v. Califano, 616 F.2d 73, 76 (3d Cir.1980); Fowler v. Califano, 596 F.2d 600, 603-04 (3d Cir.1979); Brown v. Schweiker, 562 F.Supp. 284, 288-89 (E.D.Pa.1983). … The Third Circuit, in Rossi v.

Teleflex Industrial Products, Inc. v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION

293 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1968

See International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 298 U.S. 131 , 56 S.Ct. 701 , 80 L.Ed. 1085 (1935); International Salt Co. v. … Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 242 F.Supp. 852 (D.Mass.1965).

GOK v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2023

Stridiron v. Stridiron, 698 F.2d 204, 207 Gd Cir. 1983). “[T]o sustain the burden of proving fraud and misrepresentation under Rule 60(b)(3), the evidence must be clear and convincing.” Brown y. Pa. RR. … See Brown, 282 F.2d at 527.

LAZARD v. ALL RESTORE, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2021

Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 179 n.1 (3d Cir. 2009) (alteration in original) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Atkinson v. LaFayette Coll., 460 F.3d 447, 454 n.6 (3d Cir. 2006)); see also Pedro v. … Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 179 n.1 (3d Cir. 2009) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Both claims consist of the same substantive elements. See Barnees v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 598 F.

Lockett v. Hellenic Sea Transports, Ltd.

60 F.R.D. 469 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1973

See also, Newman v. … United States v. Kolesar, 313 F.2d 835 (5th Cir. 1963).

Kamco Industrial Sales, Inc. v. Lovejoy, Inc.

779 F. Supp. 2d 416 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2011

Corbett v. Griffin, 596 Pa. 549 , 946 A.2d 668, 679 (2008) (quoting Brown v. … Slater v.

Kensington Joint Action Council v. Pauken

531 F. Supp. 656 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1982

V. … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); Kelly v. Railroad Retirement Board, 625 F.2d 486 (3d Cir. 1980).

Walker v. Spiller

54 F. Supp. 2d 421 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1999

In United States ex rel Brown v. Rundle, 450 F.2d 517, 520 (3d Cir.1971), the appellant had been in custody at the Youth Study Center on a charge of carrying a concealed deadly weapon. … The main cases cited by Walker are Baptiste v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc., 147 F.3d 1252 (10th Cir. 1998); Clipper v. Takoma Park, 876 F.2d 17 (4th Cir.1989); BeVier v. Hucal, 806 F.2d 123 (7th Cir.1986); and Sevigny v.

Donovan v. Pennsylvania Optical Workers Ass'n

603 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1985

Regular notice is given for all meetings which includes posting of notices on plant bulletin boards. 17. All present members of the union have been members for five or more years. … Illinois Education Association, 667 F.2d 638, 640 (7th Cir. *197 1982); Millwrights Local Union 1914 v. Carroll, 654 F.2d 548 (9th Cir.1981); see also Trbovich v.

WILLIAMS v. PIEDMONT AIRLINES INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2022

Williams avers, “David Zavala attempted to persuade me that the write-up was not overturned by the system board by disclosing to me a fictitious email that stated the write-up was upheld by the system board.” … Williams goes on to allege that David Zavala, “attempted to alter the results of [his] system board hearing” by trying to persuade him that the system board had not, in fact, overturned his performance write-up.