Case law

Teleflex Industrial Products, Inc. v. BRUNSWICK CORPORATION

293 F. Supp. 106 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1968

See International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 298 U.S. 131 , 56 S.Ct. 701 , 80 L.Ed. 1085 (1935); International Salt Co. v. … Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 242 F.Supp. 852 (D.Mass.1965).

McKeever v. Atlantic Spring & Manufacturing Co.

502 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1980

E. g., Barela v. United Nuclear Corp., 462 F.2d 149 (10th Cir. 1972), Bauman v. Union Oil Co., 400 F.Supp. 1021 (N.D.Cal.1973), (state agencies returned case to EEOC because of heavy workload); Morgan v. … Sharon, Pennsylvania Board of Education, 445 F.Supp. 142 (W.D.Pa.1978), (plaintiff waived state proceedings pursuant to an agreement between the EEOC and local agency).

FREEMAN v. MCGORRY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 2022

Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 61 (2011) (citing Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997)). … App’x. 132, 135 (3d Cir. 2011) (dismissing procedural due process claim against individual prison guards for unauthorized deprivations of property); Brown v.

Pennsylvania v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.

415 F. Supp. 2d 516 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 2005

Fund v. Citigroup, Inc., 391 F.3d 844, 851 (7th Cir.2004). … United Jersey Banks v. Parell, 783 F.2d 360, 365 (3d Cir.1986) (citing Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. *523 Mottley, 211 U.S. 149, 29 S.Ct. 42 , 53 L.Ed. 126 (1908)).

Marshall v. Sisters of Holy Family of Nazareth

399 F. Supp. 2d 597 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2005

Rather, plaintiff offers cases that describe across-the-board impairment of mental activity. … Nor does the use of “lay boards [or] other secular or corporate mechanisms to operate schools” remove them from the exemption. Id.

Dion v. Dion

652 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1987

In DiRuggiero v. … Brown v. Hall, 495 Pa. 635 , 435 A.2d 859, 861-863 (1981); Millstein v. Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495 , 457 A.2d 1291, 1294, 1297 (1983). As such, the separation agreement is governed by the law of contracts.

Staples v. United States

21 F. Supp. 737 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1937

In Crane v. Commissioner, Kentucky Block Coal Co. v. … in Eisner v.

Non-Resident Taxpayers Ass'n of Pa. & NJ v. Murray

347 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1972

In Harris v. … Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 , *404 85 S.Ct. 1187 , 14 L.Ed.2d 62 (1965); Desmond v. Hachey, 315 F.Supp. 328 (S.D.Me.1970). In Fuentes v. Shevin and Parham v.

CMR D.N. Corp. v. City of Philadelphia

803 F. Supp. 2d 328 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2011

Murphy v. Duquesne Univ. of the Holy Ghost, 565 Pa. 571 , 777 A.2d 418 , 434 n. 11 (2001) (quoting Slater v. Pearle Vision Ctr:, 376 Pa.Super. 580 , 546 A.2d 676, 679 (1988)); Stamerro v. … The Pennsylvania Superior Court, in Slater v.

Bosche v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare

326 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1971

Boyd v. Folsom, 257 F.2d 778 (3rd Cir. 1958); Klimaszewski v. Flemming, 176 F.Supp. 927 (E.D.Pa.1959). … National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938).

Petition for Naturalization of Spak

164 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1958

United States v. Konevitch, D.C.M.D.Pa.1946, 67 F.Supp. 250, 252 . … Petitioner testified that his child, Chana, went to the “institution” in February 1952, but stated that the arrangements were made by the Jewish Family Service (a-pparently now known as Jewish Welfare Board; see letter of

Forte v. Matthews

427 F. Supp. 187 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1977

Laws v. Celebrezze, 368 F.2d 640, 642 (4th Cir. 1966).” Ginsburg v. Richardson, 436 F.2d 1146, 1148 (3d Cir. 1971). … Barenberg, as one of a Board-certified psychiatrist, is the only opinion which would be allowed into evidence in a trial.

HAGANS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2025

Jail v. Pierce, 612 F.2d 754, 762 (3d Cir. 1979); Monmouth Cnty. Corr. Inst. Inmates v. … Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 216 (3d Cir. 2001) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1118 (3d Cir. 1989)).

Donaldson v. Hovanec

473 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1979

Cliff, 470 F.2d 271 (3d Cir. 1972); Bracey v. Grenoble, 494 F.2d 566 (3d Cir. 1974); Coggins v. McQueen, 447 F.Supp. 960 (E.D.Pa.1978); Fialkowski v. Shapp, 405 F.Supp. 946 (E.D.Pa.1975); Wilkerson v. … See Sundstrand Corporation v.

WILLIAMS v. PIEDMONT AIRLINES INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2022

Williams avers, “David Zavala attempted to persuade me that the write-up was not overturned by the system board by disclosing to me a fictitious email that stated the write-up was upheld by the system board.” … Williams goes on to allege that David Zavala, “attempted to alter the results of [his] system board hearing” by trying to persuade him that the system board had not, in fact, overturned his performance write-up.

United States v. Restrepo

698 F. Supp. 563 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 16, 1988

United States of America v. William Waddell Brown, 690 F.Supp. 1423 (E.D.Pa.1988). The issues appear to be headed for disposition by the Supreme Court in the coming term. … The Court has granted certiorari in United States v. Mistretta — that is two cases, Nos. 87-1904 and 87-7028.

Sala v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

128 F.R.D. 210 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1989

See Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. Graulty, 886 F.2d 268, 271 (9th Cir.1989) (approving Task Force recommendation that fees be awarded on percentage basis in common fund cases); Brown v. … Cunningham v.

TOWNSHIP OF TINICUM v. City of Philadelphia

737 F. Supp. 2d 367 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2010

See Prigg v. … A large hub airport is a "commercial service airport ... that has at least 1.0 percent of the passenger boardings,” meaning "revenue passenger boardings in the United States in the prior calendar year.” 49 U.S.C. § 47102

United States v. Sculco

82 F. Supp. 2d 410 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 2000

The officers were not familiar with this house and thought that the row house at 214 South Fourth Street was abandoned because a large front window was boarded up and one of the windows in the door was also boarded up. … .”); United States v. Lattimore, 87 F.3d 647, 651 (4th Cir.1996); United States v.

Giordani v. Hoffmann

278 F. Supp. 886 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1968

Finally, in Hickman v. … Similarly, in Magida on Behalf of Vulcan Detinning Co. v.