Case law

WHARTON v. VAUGHN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2022

Pennsylvania is entitled to limit the District Attorney’s discretion in this manner because “States retain autonomy to establish their own governmental processes,” Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Indep. … His explanation that he originally meant only to convey that the Office as it existed decades ago knew of the escape was clearly designed to obfuscate rather than clarify. The Court finds this explanation incredible.

Mandel

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2026

If Plaintiffs choose to replead, they must clearly articulate which allegations in the amended complaint refer to what parties and non- parties to this action. 3 The Complaint … Finally, with respect to the marketing scheme, the court held that plaintiff’s allegations of off-label marketing were conclusory and/or failed to establish that the alleged misrepresentation actually resulted in more

BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 2020

Moreover, it is simply not true that the hallway video was clearly irrelevant to the criminal case against Taylor. … Thus, this post order could establish that these requirements were in effect at the time of the Taylor attack.

ROPER v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 2020

Darden, 503 U.S. at 326 (explaining that FLSA’s definition of “employee,” has “striking breadth” and “stretches the meaning of ‘employee’ to cover some parties who might not qualify as such under a strict application of … VCI was clearly involved in writing the Code, given that the Code includes a letter from VCI’s then-CEO, Lowell McAdam, who writes “I know I can count on you to put integrity and ethical business practices at the center

ALBEE v. ALBEE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 2024

During COVID, P3N was able to qualify for certain loans which AFI by itself or doing business as Addisperse could not. N.T. 6/14/23, 199. … That the actions were intentionally calculated to do just that is clearly demonstrated in the numerous emails sent by Eric Albee to HomeWorx’ Jimmy LeFevre and Yvonne Franco in March 2017 and by the sudden and unexplained

STEIN v. CORTES

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2020

The ExpressVote suite thus qualified in six areas: (1) Source Code Review; (2) Documentation Review; (3) System Level Testing; (4) Security/Penetration Testing; (5) Privacy Analysis; and (6) Usability Analysis … Stein seeks) only “where the facts clearly establish the [Plaintiffs’] right thereto, where no adequate remedy at law exists, and where justice requires it.” Linde v. Linde, 210 A.3d 1083, 1090–91 (Pa. Sup.

FERENCIN v. LEHIGH UNIVERSITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2019

Instead, he was clearly attempting to bring stability to an unstable working relationship. 86. Dr. Odi believed that he and the plaintiff had a civil, professional working relationship. … “[T]o establish ‘constructive discharge,’ the plaintiff must make a further showing: She must show that the abusive working environment became so intolerable that her resignation qualified as a fitting response.”