Case law

DOUGHERTY v. ESSENTIA INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2025

See Brown v. Everett Cash Mut. Ins. Co., 157 A.3d 958, 968 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2017) (“[A] statutory action for bad faith can only be brought against an insurer.”). … Supp. 2d at 592 (defining insurer as the “underwriter or insurance company with whom a contract of insurance is made”); Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493, 498 (Pa. Super.

Zimmerman v. Wolff

622 F. Supp. 2d 240 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2008

Board of Trustees of New York University, 1998 WL 474084 , at *10 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.10, 1998); In Defense of Animals v. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 785 F.Supp. 100, 103 (N.D.Ohio 1991). … Freehold Cogeneration Associates, L.P. v. Board of Regulatory Com’rs of State of N.J., 44 F.3d 1178, 1184 (3d Cir.1995), citing Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983).

Ntp Marble, Inc. v. Aaa Hellenic Marble, Inc.

799 F. Supp. 2d 446 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2011

Corp. v. … June 6, 2011) (quoting Brown v. Muhlenberg Twp., 269 F.3d 205, 218 (3d Cir.2001)).

Zimmer Paper Products Inc. v. Berger & Montague, P.C.

586 F. Supp. 1555 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 30, 1984

Relying on Trist v. First Federal Savings & Loan, 89 F.R.D. 1 (E.D.Pa.1980), I dismissed Count II. … Mennonite Board of Mission v. Adams, [— U.S. *1558 -] 103 S.Ct. 2706 [ 77 L.Ed.2d 180 ] (1983).

Siegel Transfer, Inc. v. Carrier Express, Inc.

856 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1994

James Matthews is the Vice-President and member of the Board of Directors of both Carrier Express and Bethtran. Mr. Van Heel is a Bethlehem Steel Employee and a Bethtran Board member. Mr. … He is also a member of the Board of Directors of Rediehs Express, Inc.

Wilson & Co. v. Birl

27 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 8, 1939

See Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 2 Cir., 71 F.2d 284 . In short, it was an adoption of the philosophy of Justice Brandeis’s dissenting opinion in Duplex Printing Press Co. v. … The Apex opinion [ 90 F.2d 159 ] (with the statement, “We are concerned with what the law is today”) held that the Supreme Court’s decision in the Jones & Laughlin Case, National Labor Relations Board v.

NICHOLS v. OSEI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2023

(citing Kneipp v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997) (deliberate indifference requires “proof that a municipal actor disregarded a known or obvious consequence” of his action); Pembaur v.

Freeman v. McKellar

795 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 27, 1992

See Hishon v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). In Paul v.

Riddle v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

831 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 1993

Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 77 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 892 , 894 n. 1, 79 L.Ed.2.d 56 (1984) and Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Co., 725 F.2d 627, 632 (11th Cir.1984). … See Also: Anchorage Associates v. Virgin Islands Board of Tax Review, 922 F.2d 168, 174-175 (3rd Cir.1990). C. Application of the Doctrine of Official Immunity.

SWEDA v. JACK HEUER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 2021

No. 149 (M.D.N.C. 2019) ($10,650,000 settlement); Daugherty v. Univ. of Chicago, No. 17-cv-03736, Doc. No. 57 (N.D. Ill. 2018) ($6,500,000 settlement); Short v. Brown Univ., 17-cv-00318, Doc. … Class Counsel cite the expert testimony of Stewart Brown, C.F.A., to estimate the “actual value.” Je; see also Doc.

CURTIS v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2024

Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318, 223-339 (2012) the United States Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution does not bar correctional officers … Brown v. Blaine, 185 F. App’x 166, 169 (3d Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (citing Bell, 441 U.S. at 559-60); see also Millhouse, 373 F. App’x at 137.

Equitable Trust Co. v. Schwebel

32 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1940

In Wilson v. … Cas. 518; Somers v. Hanson, 5 Phila. 87 ; Syfert’s Estate, 9 Phila. 320 ; [4] Bogert, Trusts & Trustees, § 961; Sloo v. Law, 3 Blatchf. 459 , Fed.Cas.No.12,957.

Johnson v. Jackson

82 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1949

the plaintiff went to Washington in October, 1944, where he apparently created some interest on the part of the government in the device, predicated, however, upon putting a pilot model in the hands of the War Production Board … Dixon v. Dixon, 123 Me. 470 , 124 A. 198, 199 . In Beatty v. Guggenheim Exploration Co., 225 N.Y. 380 , 122 N.E. 378, 380 , the New York Court of Appeals, speaking through Mr.

BURK v. WELLPATH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 2024

Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13-7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.

Wickham v. Blight

29 F. Cas. 1140 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 1834

In tbe ease of Jameson v. … In Pennsylvania (Dinkle v.

SCHRUBY v. SIANNI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2020

Later, Defendants Brown and Knapp removed Schruby from the RHU, indicating that he was going to the medical department. (Ud. at 4 56.) … See Small v. Wetzel, 528 F. App’x 202 (3d Cir. 2013). According to the Amended Complaint, Defendants Brown and Knapp arrived at Schruby’s RHU holding cell to escort him to the medical unit.

Yates v. Commercial Index Bureau, Inc.

861 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2012

Dalrymple v. Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997). … Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Servs., Inc., 4 A.3d 170, 174 (Pa.Super.Ct.2010); accord O’Donnell v.

Beck v. Borough of Manheim

505 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1981

See Usery v. … In Massachusetts Board of Retirement v.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Incus, Verlin, Hahn, Reich & Goldstein Professional Corp.

42 B.R. 960 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1984

Lawall v. Groman, 180 Pa. 532, 537 , 37 A. 98 (1897). See also Silbiger v. Prudence Bonds Corp., 180 F.2d 917 (2d Cir.1950). … They rely on language found in Brown v. Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 360 , 186 A.2d 399 (1962). Waiver is essentially a matter of intention. It may be expressed or implied.

Davies v. Polyscience, Inc.

126 F. Supp. 2d 391 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 2001

Schafer v. Board of Public Educ., 903 F.2d 243 , 252 (3d Cir.1990); see also Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co., 629 F.2d 248 , 251 (3d Cir.1980) (stating four-part test for exception to exhaustion requirement). … See, e.g., Fullman v. Philadelphia Int’l Airport, 49 F.Supp.2d 434, 441 (E.D.Pa.1999); Brannaka v. Bergey’s, Inc., No. 97-CV-6921, 1998 WL 195660 , at *1 (E.D.Pa. Mar.30, 1998); Saylor v.