Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.58s

  • Teamsters Local No. 429 Health & Welfare Fund v. Chain Bike Corp.

    643 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1986

    . § 151 et seq., vests jurisdiction to resolve this matter exclusively with the National Labor Relations Board. … See National Metalcrafters v. McNeil, 784 F.2d 817 (7th Cir.1986); see also, Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202 , 105 S.Ct. 1904 , 85 L.Ed.2d 206 (1985); Oglesby v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bensalem Township v. Western World Insurance

    609 F. Supp. 1343 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1985

    V. … Defendant makes much of the fact that the Chairman of the Bensalem Township Board of Supervisors referred to the EEOC charge as "an Equal Opportunity law suit” at a Board meeting, and asked the township’s solicitor to "take

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • FLUKER v. TRANS UNION, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2025

    Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13- 7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ROSADO v. THE NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2022

    See Brown v. Crawford Cty., No. CA 12-80, 2013 WL 411472, at *5 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2013) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 95 (1989)). … See Brown v. Cwynar, 484 F. App'x 676, 681 (3d Cir. 2012) (finding that the use of taser against the arrestee was not excessive when he resisted arrest); see also Est. of Good v. Rodriguez-Santana, No.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Minissale v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

    988 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2013

    In Irving v. … Brown v. Modell’s PA II, Inc., No. 08-1528, 2008 WL 2600253 (E.D.Pa.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • United States v. Kline

    201 F. 954 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1913

    S. v. Simmons, 96 U. S. 362 [ 24 L. Ed. 819 ]; U. S. v. Carll, 105 U. S. 612 [ 26 L. Ed. 1135 ]; U. S. v. Hess, 124 U. S. 483 , 8 Sup. Ct. 571 [ 31 L. Ed. 516 ]; Pettibone v. U. S., 148 U. S. 197 , 13 Sup. … United States v. Kenney (C. C.) 90 Fed. 257 ; Spurr v. United States, 87 Fed. 701 , 31 C. C. A. 202 ; United States v. Watson (D. C.) 35 Fed. 359 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tetterton v. Arctic Tankers, Inc.

    116 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1953

    Tetterton, while mentally deranged, committed suicide on board the S. S. … Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., Inc., D.C., 70 F. 2d 326 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Saraco v. Hallett

    831 F. Supp. 1154 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1993

    Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 833 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1968 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (as a general rule, specific jurisdictional statutes control over general statutes); Parker, 935 F.2d at 1178 . … Brown, 425 U.S. at 833 , 96 S.Ct. at 1968. C. Venue Does Not Lie in This District Under the Little Tucker Act.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • STOLTZ v. SAUL

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2022

    Hartranft v. Apfel, 181 F.3d 358, 360 (3d Cir. 1999) (quoting Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 564-65 (1988)); Kangas v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 775, 777 (3d Cir. 1987). … Brown, D.O., persuasive. Id. Dr. Brown opined that Stoltz could stand or walk for about six hours in an eight- hour workday. Id. at 113. The ALJ stated that Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McKinney v. West End Voluntary Ambulance Ass'n

    821 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992

    The Board and Staff Members of the Ambulance Association are neither government officials, nor appointed by government officials. Its membership consists of volunteers. … The Board and Staff Members of the Ambulance Association are neither government officials, nor appointed by government officials. Its membership consists of volunteers.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • WALKER v. SELLERS

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2024

    See, e.g., Brown v. Hannah, 850 F. Supp. 2d 471, 478 (M.D. Pa. 2012) (“[Mr.] … Brown’s allegations that he was issued a falsified misconduct report, and that Hearing Examiner Mitchell denied a witness and the opportunity for [Mr.]

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Newman v. Forward Lands, Inc.

    430 F. Supp. 1320 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1977

    There the court allowed patients of a non-profit hospital to maintain an action against the hospital’s board of trustees to redress their alleged fiscal mismanagement. … Hoffman v. Pittsburgh, 365 Pa. 386 , 75 A.2d 649 (1950).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • TUTORA v. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2025

    Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13- 7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Resources for Human Development, Inc. v. Lower Providence Township

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2025

    (citing Wards Cove Packing Co. v. … We have applied this provision to the decisions of local land use boards.” Allentown Victory Church v. City of Allentown, Pennsylvania, No. 22-2817, 2024 WL 3439772, at *5 (3d Cir.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gatter v. Cleland

    512 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1981

    Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United States, 602 F.2d 574, 578-79 (1979), See also Bramley v. Webster, 476 F.Supp. 351, 352 (E.D.Pa.1979). … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1979). These directives contained in the VA Manual and Circulars do not possess the necessary characteristics of binding agency law.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • IN RE: VANGUARD CHESTER FUNDS LITIGATION

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2023

    Albert v. Alex. Brown Mgmt. Servs., Inc. (Albert II), 2005 WL 2130607, at *4 (Del. Ch. Aug. 26, 2005) (quoting Cincinnati Bell Cellular Sys. Co. v. … Citigroup then cited to Albert v. Alex. Brown Management Services, Inc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Love v. Law School Admission Council, Inc.

    513 F. Supp. 2d 206 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2007

    In Sutton v. … The same cannot be said for this case. *228 We find the instant case more like the cases of Gonzalez v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 60 F.Supp.2d 703 (E.D.Mich.1999) and Price v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • EDMOND v. KIJAKAZI

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2025

    Zirnsak v. Colvin, 777 F.2d 607, 610 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 552 (3d Cir. 2005)); see also Biestek v. … Brown, D.O., concurred with Dr. Hollick’s assessment, except that Plaintiff should avoid exposure only to hazards such as machinery and heights. Tr. at 97- 99, 115-17. Dr. Brown agreed with Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. United States Department of Interior

    160 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1958

    Co. v. Lane, 1917, 244 U.S. 492 , 37 S.Ct. 714 , 61 L.Ed. 1275 ; Chapman v. Santa Fe Pac. R. … In the latter it was decided that the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 88 F.2d 154 , had erroneously held that a District Court, 15 F.Supp. 915 , had jurisdiction to enjoin a National Labor Relations Board hearing.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Prater v. Am. Heritage Fed. Credit Union

    351 F. Supp. 3d 912 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2019

    Chapman (identified as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Equifax, Inc.). Prater has also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) … Co. of Am. v. Burr , 551 U.S. 47 , 52, 127 S.Ct. 2201 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2007) ; see also SimmsParris v. Countrywide Fin.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.