Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.58s
Teamsters Local No. 429 Health & Welfare Fund v. Chain Bike Corp.
643 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1986
. § 151 et seq., vests jurisdiction to resolve this matter exclusively with the National Labor Relations Board. … See National Metalcrafters v. McNeil, 784 F.2d 817 (7th Cir.1986); see also, Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck, 471 U.S. 202 , 105 S.Ct. 1904 , 85 L.Ed.2d 206 (1985); Oglesby v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBensalem Township v. Western World Insurance
609 F. Supp. 1343 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1985
V. … Defendant makes much of the fact that the Chairman of the Bensalem Township Board of Supervisors referred to the EEOC charge as "an Equal Opportunity law suit” at a Board meeting, and asked the township’s solicitor to "take
Cited 32 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2025
Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13- 7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownROSADO v. THE NORTHAMPTON BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2022
See Brown v. Crawford Cty., No. CA 12-80, 2013 WL 411472, at *5 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 1, 2013) (quoting Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 95 (1989)). … See Brown v. Cwynar, 484 F. App'x 676, 681 (3d Cir. 2012) (finding that the use of taser against the arrestee was not excessive when he resisted arrest); see also Est. of Good v. Rodriguez-Santana, No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMinissale v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
988 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2013
In Irving v. … Brown v. Modell’s PA II, Inc., No. 08-1528, 2008 WL 2600253 (E.D.Pa.
Cited 13 timesPublished201 F. 954 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 1913
S. v. Simmons, 96 U. S. 362 [ 24 L. Ed. 819 ]; U. S. v. Carll, 105 U. S. 612 [ 26 L. Ed. 1135 ]; U. S. v. Hess, 124 U. S. 483 , 8 Sup. Ct. 571 [ 31 L. Ed. 516 ]; Pettibone v. U. S., 148 U. S. 197 , 13 Sup. … United States v. Kenney (C. C.) 90 Fed. 257 ; Spurr v. United States, 87 Fed. 701 , 31 C. C. A. 202 ; United States v. Watson (D. C.) 35 Fed. 359 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedTetterton v. Arctic Tankers, Inc.
116 F. Supp. 429 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1953
Tetterton, while mentally deranged, committed suicide on board the S. S. … Middleton v. Luckenbach S. S. Co., Inc., D.C., 70 F. 2d 326 .
Cited 18 timesPublished831 F. Supp. 1154 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1993
Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 833 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1968 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (as a general rule, specific jurisdictional statutes control over general statutes); Parker, 935 F.2d at 1178 . … Brown, 425 U.S. at 833 , 96 S.Ct. at 1968. C. Venue Does Not Lie in This District Under the Little Tucker Act.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2022
Hartranft v. Apfel, 181 F.3d 358, 360 (3d Cir. 1999) (quoting Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 564-65 (1988)); Kangas v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 775, 777 (3d Cir. 1987). … Brown, D.O., persuasive. Id. Dr. Brown opined that Stoltz could stand or walk for about six hours in an eight- hour workday. Id. at 113. The ALJ stated that Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcKinney v. West End Voluntary Ambulance Ass'n
821 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992
The Board and Staff Members of the Ambulance Association are neither government officials, nor appointed by government officials. Its membership consists of volunteers. … The Board and Staff Members of the Ambulance Association are neither government officials, nor appointed by government officials. Its membership consists of volunteers.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2024
See, e.g., Brown v. Hannah, 850 F. Supp. 2d 471, 478 (M.D. Pa. 2012) (“[Mr.] … Brown’s allegations that he was issued a falsified misconduct report, and that Hearing Examiner Mitchell denied a witness and the opportunity for [Mr.]
Cited 0 timesUnknown430 F. Supp. 1320 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1977
There the court allowed patients of a non-profit hospital to maintain an action against the hospital’s board of trustees to redress their alleged fiscal mismanagement. … Hoffman v. Pittsburgh, 365 Pa. 386 , 75 A.2d 649 (1950).
Cited 3 timesPublishedTUTORA v. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2025
Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13- 7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.
Cited 0 timesUnknownResources for Human Development, Inc. v. Lower Providence Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 2025
(citing Wards Cove Packing Co. v. … We have applied this provision to the decisions of local land use boards.” Allentown Victory Church v. City of Allentown, Pennsylvania, No. 22-2817, 2024 WL 3439772, at *5 (3d Cir.
Cited 0 timesUnknown512 F. Supp. 207 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1981
Local 2855, AFGE (AFL-CIO) v. United States, 602 F.2d 574, 578-79 (1979), See also Bramley v. Webster, 476 F.Supp. 351, 352 (E.D.Pa.1979). … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1717 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1979). These directives contained in the VA Manual and Circulars do not possess the necessary characteristics of binding agency law.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIN RE: VANGUARD CHESTER FUNDS LITIGATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 2023
Albert v. Alex. Brown Mgmt. Servs., Inc. (Albert II), 2005 WL 2130607, at *4 (Del. Ch. Aug. 26, 2005) (quoting Cincinnati Bell Cellular Sys. Co. v. … Citigroup then cited to Albert v. Alex. Brown Management Services, Inc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLove v. Law School Admission Council, Inc.
513 F. Supp. 2d 206 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2007
In Sutton v. … The same cannot be said for this case. *228 We find the instant case more like the cases of Gonzalez v. National Board of Medical Examiners, 60 F.Supp.2d 703 (E.D.Mich.1999) and Price v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2025
Zirnsak v. Colvin, 777 F.2d 607, 610 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Rutherford v. Barnhart, 399 F.3d 546, 552 (3d Cir. 2005)); see also Biestek v. … Brown, D.O., concurred with Dr. Hollick’s assessment, except that Plaintiff should avoid exposure only to hazards such as machinery and heights. Tr. at 97- 99, 115-17. Dr. Brown agreed with Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRobert Hawthorne, Inc. v. United States Department of Interior
160 F. Supp. 417 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1958
Co. v. Lane, 1917, 244 U.S. 492 , 37 S.Ct. 714 , 61 L.Ed. 1275 ; Chapman v. Santa Fe Pac. R. … In the latter it was decided that the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, 88 F.2d 154 , had erroneously held that a District Court, 15 F.Supp. 915 , had jurisdiction to enjoin a National Labor Relations Board hearing.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPrater v. Am. Heritage Fed. Credit Union
351 F. Supp. 3d 912 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2019
Chapman (identified as Chairman of the Board and CEO of Equifax, Inc.). Prater has also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 1.) … Co. of Am. v. Burr , 551 U.S. 47 , 52, 127 S.Ct. 2201 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1045 (2007) ; see also SimmsParris v. Countrywide Fin.
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna