Case law

Rodinciuc v. United States

74 F. Supp. 284 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1947

Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163 , 15 S.Ct. 85 , 39 L.Ed. 108 ; Defense Supplies Corporation v. United States Lines Co., 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 311 . … Also see Carroll v. United States et al., 2 Cir., 133 F.2d 690, 692, 693 ; Barnes v. United States, D. C.

American MacHinery Co. v. Everedy MacH. Co.

35 F.2d 526 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1929

They conducted its affairs without receiving any direction from any board of directors, and without any real control of what was done. … Co. v. Woodward (C. C.

American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, Marine Division, International Union of Operating Engineers

224 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1963

Defendant Union has been certified by the National Labor Relations Board as the representative of the employees of plaintiff for the purpose of collective bargaining. 8. … Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v.

Bryson v. United States

463 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1978

The analysis in Martin v. … Defendants Jimmy Carter, President of the United States, Harold Brown, Secretary of Defense, and Clifford L.

Alexander v. Polk

572 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1983

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … The Court found that the Connecticut statute had provided the Board of Pardons with “unfettered discretion.” In Greenholtz v.

Aetna Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.

324 F. Supp. 3d 541 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 2018

Co., Ltd. v. Superior Court of California , 480 U.S. 102 , 109, 107 S.Ct. 1026 , 94 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987) ). Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown , 564 U.S. 915 , 919, 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011). … Corp. v. White Consol. Indus., Inc. , 998 F.2d 1192 , 1196 (3d Cir. 1993) ; Brown v. Daniels, 128 F. App'x. 910 , 913 (3d Cir. 2005) (quoting Lum v. Bank of America, 361 F.3d 217 , 222 n. 3 (3d Cir. 2004) ).

Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. Millar Bros. & Co.

152 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1957

E. v. National Gypsum Co., D.C.D.Mass. 1940, 33 F.Supp. 61, 63 ; Urquhart v. … In Neirbo Co. v.

Greenwood v. Singel

823 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1993

In support of their position, plaintiffs rely on Harper v. Virginia State Board *1212 of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 (1966) and Kramer v. … Thus, in Smith v.

O'NEILL v. United States

157 F. Supp. 193 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1957

Boboricken v. … These cases make clear that recovery under 46 U.S.C.A. § 688 (see Brown v. C.D.

WHITE v. SALTER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2023

Brown v. Lyons, 977 F. Supp. 2d 475, 481-82 (E.D. Pa. 2013) (citing Pettus v. Morgenthau, 554 F.3d 293, 297 (2d Cir. 2009)). … .; see also Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct., E. Dist., No. 13-7229, 2014 WL 1225878, at *1 (E.D. Pa.

Goodwin v. Elkins & Co.

558 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1983

As stated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Waddell v. … See, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Haydu, 675 F.2d 1169 (11th Cir.1982); Sawyer v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc., 642 F.2d 791 (5th Cir.1981).

Lacey Ex Rel. Brookins v. Cohen

596 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1984

In Blum v. … recipients____” Budnicki v.

Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension v. Lutyk

140 F. Supp. 2d 407 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2001

See, e.g., Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. J.R.D. Mechanical Services, Inc. … See Antol v.

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United Transportation Union General Committee of Adjustment

908 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1995

Finally, defendants seek to stay this action pending a resolution of certain safety issues before the Railroad Adjustment Board under § 10(b) and '(c) of the Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20109 (b) and (c); RLA, 45 U.S.C. § 153 … The court may then have to defer to a decision of the Railroad Adjustment Board. It is not appropriate, however, to do so at this time. See 49 U.S.C. § 20109 (c).

WILLIAMS v. PIEDMONT AIRLINES

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 2022

He claims Piedmont and the CWA told an unidentified shop steward she could not speak to Plaintiff and that system board members attempted to reverse a hearing board decision that was rendered in his favor. (Id. … In Hawaiian Airlines v.

BOYLE v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2022

at 536; United States v. … VHA Directive 1088(1), at 4, Brown v. United States, No, 17-cv-1551, 2018 WL 741731 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 7, 2018), aff'd, 823 F. App’x 97 (3d Cir. 2020).

PETERY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2025

(quoting Bell v. … See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F.

ROBINSON v. KIRSCH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 2022

See Palokovic, 854 F.3d at 227; Brown, 903 F.2d at 278; e.g., McDonald-Witherspoon v. City of Phila., 481 F. Supp. 3d 424, 444 (E.D. … (quoting Hightower-Warren v. Silk, 698 A.2d 52, 54 n.1 (1997)); Brown v. Hahnemann Univ. Hosp., 20 F. Supp. 3d 538, 543 (E.D.

MURPHY v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2019

Board”), Paul J. … The motion to dismiss, to the extent that the defendants argue that this court must abstain from exercising jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Younger v.

Koschoff v. Henderson

109 F. Supp. 2d 332 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 2000

See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … In Hurley v.