Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Insurance Co. of North America v. Easton & McMahon Transp. Co.

    97 F. 653 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1899

    The wind was not violent, and there was nothing about the weather or the motion of the boats to suggest danger to the men on board of the barge. … This was approved in Garrison v. Insurance Co., 19 How. 312 , and in Richards v. Hansen (C. C.) 1 Fed. 61 . Anq flier definition may be found in The Warren Adams, 20 C. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Conquest

    148 F. Supp. 62 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1957

    Evans v. … sent to the Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Pitts

    3 F. Supp. 2d 637 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1998

    United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 , 117 S.Ct. 633, 638 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997); United States v. Goggins, 99 F.3d 116, 119 (3d Cir.1996). … For example, in United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ACKIE v. PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 2020

    Crawford v. Verizon Pa., Inc., 103 F. Supp. 3d 597, 603 (E.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Jones v. Sch. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sturdevant v. Celebrezze

    239 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 26, 1965

    As a result of these determinations the Board *747 decided that plaintiff was overpaid the sum of $2,739.00 in these years, and required restitution to be made in this amount. … Sturdevant v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, be remanded to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Northeastern Power Co. v. Balcke-Durr, Inc.

    49 F. Supp. 2d 783 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1999

    In addition, “three of five BDAG Board members sit on BD GmbH’s four member board.” Id. … In Johnson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Roman v. Appleby

    558 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1983

    See, e.g., Davis v. Page, 385 F.Supp. 395, 400 (D.N.H.1974); Cornwall v. State Board of Education. As stated in Williams v. Board of Education of Cty. of Kanawha, “... … Garner v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Bates v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.

    493 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1979

    Bank, 537 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1976); Ratner v. … Sharp v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 452 F.Supp. 465, 468 (S.D.Ill.1978). In Jennings v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Reading Co.

    279 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1968

    In Hoffman v. … Arbitration Board No. 282, appointed pursuant to Public Law 88-108, 77 Stat. 132, 45 U.S.C.A. § 157 et seq. .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Stolt-Nielsen S.A.

    524 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2007

    See, e.g., Harrod v. … See United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Continental-Wirt Electronics Corp. v. Corning Glass Works, Inc.

    321 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1971

    Garelick v. Goerlich’s, Inc., 323 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1963); Manok v. Southeast District Bowling Ass’n, 306 F.Supp. 1215 (C.D. Cal.1969); Poster Exchange, Inc. v. … Highland Supply Corp. v. Reynolds Metals Co., 327 F.2d 725 (8th Cir. 1964); Schenley Ind. v. N. J. Wine & Spirit Wholesalers Ass’n, 272 F.Supp. 872 (D.N.J.1967); Winkler-Koch Engineering Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • CORBIN v. FRENCH

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 2022

    See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F. … App’x 239, 240 (3d Cir. 2018) (per curiam); Brown v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 763 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Robson v. United States

    279 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 1968

    Collateral attacks are obviously permitted when the Board had no jurisdiction of the person or of the crime or when acting far afield of its statutory powers. … Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), and Weeks v. U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Shober

    489 F. Supp. 393 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1979

    United States v. Greater Syracuse Board of Realtors, Inc., 449 F.Supp. 887, 899 (N.D.N.Y.1978). … Cir. 1974), United States v. Brown, 508 F.2d 427, 434 (8th Cir. 1974), Spillman v. United States, 413 F.2d at 530 , Newman v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Department of Homeland Security

    325 F. Supp. 2d 551 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 2004

    Petitioner’s appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals was dismissed. Id. at ¶ 7 . On October 14, 2003, petitioner filed the Original Petition. … See Baeta v. Sonchik, 273 F.3d 1261, 1263 (9th Cir.2001); Batista v. Ashcroft, 270 F.3d 8, 11-12 (1st Cir.2001); Hughes v. Ashcroft, 255 F.3d 752, 755 (9th Cir.2001); Hussein v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Daye v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

    344 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1972

    In Petty v. … As to the probable cause of this accident, the Board concluded: “The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was either dynamic or viscous hydroplaning of the front wheels

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Gulf Insurance Co. v. MacK Warehouse Corporation

    212 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1962

    For periodicals discussing the general problem see: Brown and Risjord, Loading and Unloading: The Conflict Between Fortuitous Adversaries, 29 Ins. … Compare Globe Indemnity Company v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. YOASH GOHIL v. AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 2020

    Escobar v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • JACKSON v. HOLLAND

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2021

    Jackson names as Defendants LCP Warden Cheryl Steberger, LCP correctional officer Michael Holland, the Lancaster County Prison Board (“the Board”), and Lancaster County. … Connick v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mark v. Borough of Hatboro

    856 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1994

    Inc. v. … See also McKeesport v. ACGME, 24 F.3d at 525 (no symbiotic relationship between ACGME and State board because ACGME was self-governed and financed and set standards independently).

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.