Case law

Forrest v. Case

604 F. Supp. 349 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1985

As authority for this proposition, defendants cited two cases from this district that found the Supreme Court holding of Parratt v. … Since the filing of defendants’ motion for reconsideration, the Third Circuit, in Davidson v.

United States v. Polin

824 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1993

See United States v. Soberon, 929 F.2d 935, 939-40 (3d Cir.) … United States v. Thomas, 772 F.Supp. 674, 675 (D.D.C.1991) (quoting United States v. Lincoln, 630 F.2d 1313, 1319 (8th Cir.1980)). See also Tibbs v.

Leone v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.

448 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1978

Cruz v. Beto. 405 U.S. 319 . 322. 92 S.Ct. *699 1079 , 31 L.Ed.2d 263 (1972); Clark v. Gulf Oil Corporation, 570 F.2d 1138 , 1141 n.l (3d Cir. 1977). … Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357, 360-61 , 186 A.2d 399, 401 (1962) (emphasis in original) (citations and footnote omitted). Goodwin v. Hartford Life Insurance Co., 491 F.2d 332 , 333 n.l (3d Cir. 1974).

Sterrett v. Hydro-United Tire Corp.

32 F.2d 823 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1929

Lipschitz v. Napa Fruit Co., 223 F. 698 (C. C. A. 2d Circ.). See, also, Chase v. Sheldon Roller-Mills Co. (C. C.) 56 F. 625 ; Davis v. Mills (C. C.) 99 F. 39 ; Holmes v. Goldsmith, 147 U. S. 150 , 13 S. Ct. 288 , 37 L. … However, as was said in Stanley v. Board of Supervisors (C.

Easton Area Joint Sewer Authority v. Bushkill-Lower Lehigh Joint Sewer Authority

517 F. Supp. 583 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1981

Fleming v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 508 F.Supp. 917 (E.D.Pa.1981) and Mazur v. … Vil-lareal v. Brown Express, Inc., 529 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1976). However, in the case at bar the conclusion would be the same with either analysis. See, for example, Winters Government Security Corp. v.

The Plow City

23 F. Supp. 548 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 1938

Co. v. Manati Sugar Co., 2 Cir., 269 F. 774 ; American Steel Co. of Cuba v. … United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp. v. Florida G. & E. Co., 5 Cir., 20 F.2d 583 .

Griffin v. Spratt

768 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1991

The court’s constitutional inquiry is satisfied because there is “some evidence that supports the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Superintendent v. … Plaintiff served only thirty days of the original sixty-day sanction before release by.the prison review board.

Alexander Young Distilling Co. v. National Distillers Products Corp.

40 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1941

In Pennsylvania Rubber Co. v. … Lorillard Co. v.

United States Ex Rel. Snyder v. MacK

372 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1974

See also Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575, 589 , 84 S.Ct. 841 , 11 L.Ed.2d 921 (1964) ; United States v. … Drew v. Myers, 327 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 847 , 85 S.Ct. 88 , 13 L.Ed.2d 52 . 9 . See Brown v.

Merchants' Warehouse Co. v. United States

44 F.2d 379 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1930

Everything has been done openly and above board. The railroads have not and are not taking part in the controversy. … And in another ease (Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.) involving a similar question, the Supreme Court, in the same volume, at page 529, 48 S. Ct. 404, 407 , 72 L.

Klitzner Industries, Inc. v. H.K. James & Co.

96 F.R.D. 614 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1983

Lauratex Textile Corp. v. Allton Knitting Mills, Inc., 519 F.Supp. 730, 733 (S.D.N.Y.1981); Boz Scaggs Music v. KNB Corp., 491 F.Supp. 908, 913 (D.Conn.1980); Lottie Joplin Thomas Trust v. … Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College, 590 F.2d 470, 492 (3d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979).

Nelson v. Howard

810 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1992

Warminster Township Board of Supervisors, 512 F.Supp. 658 (E.D.Pa. 1981), aff'd, 681 F.2d 806 (3rd Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 834 , 103 S.Ct. 76 , 74 L.Ed.2d 74 (1982); Montana v. … Younger v.

WARDLAW v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2022

With respect to PhillyCAM and its Board, we explained the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Manhattan Community Access Corporation v. Halleck, 139 S. … Neither PhillyCAM nor its Board members are parties to the franchise agreements. fundamental contract law that one cannot be liable for a breach of contract unless one is a party to that contract.” QVC, Inc. v.

Delval Motors, Inc. v. Oldsmobile Division, General Motors Corp.

193 F. Supp. 697 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1961

Plaintiff contends that it is not bound by the release because its president was not authorized by its Board of Directors and by the other owner of plaintiff corporation’s stock to execute and deliver the release. … See Krieger v. Ownership Corporation, 3 Cir., 1959, 270 F.2d 265 ; Lawlor v.

In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation

648 F. Supp. 2d 663 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 2009

In Brown v. Ticor Title Ins. … Consequently, even if Brown, an opinion from another circuit, were to apply, it would not support plaintiffs’ argument.

Yeckabofsky v. Ribicoff

206 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1962

A determination by the Pennsylvania State Board of Vocational Education concluded: “We feel on the basis of the evidence presented that W/E is not disabled. His dyspnea is not too limiting. … Ribicoff, 292 F.2d 354 (C.A.3, 1961); Parrish v. Ribicoff, supra.

Seide v. Shalala

31 F. Supp. 2d 466 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1998

Plaintiff then filed a timely Notice of Appeal and Brief with Departmental Appeals Board (“DAB”) who, on May 20, 1998, declined to review ALJ Riotto’s decision. 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21 (a), (g). … Patel v. Shalala, 17 F.Supp.2d 662, 665 (W.D.Ky.1998) (citing Garner v. Heckler, 745 F.2d 383, 387 (6th Cir.1984)).

In Re Penn Central Transportation Company

337 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1972

Industrial Trust Co. v. Stidham, 3 Terry 339 , 33 A.2d 159 (1942). … See Puma v. Marriott, 294 F.Supp. 1116, 1119 (D.Del.1969).

Reynolds v. RUCK'S MUSHROOM SERVICE, INC.

246 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2003

Defendants do not dispute that rain falling on the SMS piles produces a “wastewater runoff’ that is “blackish-brown” and “looks like oil.” … See United States v.

In Re Penn Central Transportation Company

332 F. Supp. 1302 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1971

MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST CO., Trustee v. PENN CENTRAL TRUSTEES. No. 70-347. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. September 30, 1971. … Brown, Jr., New York City, for Institutional Investors, Penn Central Group. Kelley, Drye, Warren, Clark, Carr & Ellis, by Frank H. Heiss, New York City, for Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., as Trustee.