Case law

Bunny Bear, Inc. v. Dennis Mitchell Industries

139 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1956

See Four Roses Products Co. v. … To the extent that the plaintiff wishes to set aside the findings of the Board of Appeals, it has been said that his burden is not to be sustained by a mere preponderance of the evidence. See Century Distilling Co. v.

American Type Founders, Inc. v. Lanston Monotype Machine Co.

45 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1942

As was said in Rossmassler v. … See Harris v. Brown, 202 Pa. 16 , 51 A. 586 , 90 Am.St.Rep. 610 , and cases cited therein.

PRIKIS v. MAXATAWNY TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2024

In Ahmed v. … V.

POPICHAK v. PEURIFOY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2023

See Rode v. … See Benn v.

Biggans v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.

487 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1980

Gordon & Co. v. Board of Governors of Fed. Reserve System, 317 F.Supp. 1045, 1046 (D.Mass.1970). 2 . … Goldenberg v. Bache & Co., 270 F.2d 675 (5th Cir. 1959). See Hecht v. Harris Upham & Co., 283 F.Supp. 417 (N.D.Cal. 1968), modified in part, 430 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1970). See also United States v.

Harman v. Wetzel

766 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1991

Estate of Bailey by Oare v. County of York, 768 F.2d 503, 506 (3d Cir.1985); Helstoski v. Goldstein, 552 F.2d 564, 565 (3d Cir.1977) (per curiam). II. … Count V In Count V, plaintiff alleges that Mr.

Campbell v. Associated Press

223 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 1963

In Ardison v. … The activities and affairs of the defendant throughout the United States and the world are directed solely from the above address where its executive staff is located, where its Board of Directors holds its meetings, and

Hirsh v. Boeing Health and Welfare Benefit Plan

719 F. Supp. 2d 508 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 2010

Metropolitan Life Ins. v. … The Plan Administrator also has been delegated authority by the Board of Di *515 rectors to amend the Plan. The Board of Directors has authority to terminate the Plan.

Bauer v. Sielaff

372 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1974

Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 , 940 (3d Cir. 1969) (footnote omitted). In United States ex rel. Tyrrell v. Speaker, 471 F.2d 1197, 1202 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, Milam v. … Jones v.

AT & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Local 13000 Communications Workers

650 F. Supp. 1030 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1985

Under DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 , 103 S.Ct. 2281 , 76 L.Ed.2d 476 (1983), and Local Union 1397 v. … American Bell, Inc. v. Federation of Tel. Workers, 736 F.2d 879 (3d Cir.1984). .

McEnteer v. Clarke

638 F. Supp. 911 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1986

See Northeast *915 Bancorp v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2545, 2548 , 86 L.Ed.2d 112 (1985). … Inc. v. Board of Governors, 105 S.Ct. 2545, 2553-2554 (1985).

UPPER GWYNEDD EQUITIES, LLC v. PROVCO PINEGOOD SUMNEYTOWN, LLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2022

Bedell Wholesale Co. v. … See Grant v. Zoning Hearing Board of Township Penn., 776 A.2d 356, 359 (Pa.

Parrish v. Ribicoff

195 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1961

Universal Camera Corp. v. … In the case of Klimaszewski v.

United States v. Staino

690 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1988

In United States v. … See also United States v.

Oxford Finance Companies, Inc. v. Harvey

385 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1974

Wasnowic v. Chicago Board of Trade, 352 F.Supp. 1066, 1070 (M.D.Pa. 1972), aff’d. 491 F.2d 752 (C.A.3, 1974). … C. v. W. J.

Wilson v. Slatalla

970 F. Supp. 405 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1997

See Pastore v. … In Matus v.

Guerrero v. Bensalem Racing Ass'n

25 F. Supp. 3d 573 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2014

Moreover, in Pawlak v. Nix, the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners’ decided that the plaintiff, Elizabeth Pawlak, lacked the requisite character to sit for the bar examination. Pawlak, 1996 WL 560360 at *1. … The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied her petition and affirmed the Board’s decision to refuse her admission. Id.

Lehner v. Crane Co.

448 F. Supp. 1127 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1978

The proposal was reviewed by Crane executives, submitted to its board of directors, and approved during a board meeting at the company’s main offices in New York on March 25. … In Bradley v.

Churchill v. Star Enterprises

3 F. Supp. 2d 625 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1998

Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman, 38 F.3d 1380, 1391 (3d Cir.1994); Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. White Consol. … Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of N.J. Welfare Fund, Inc. Pension Fund v. Centra, 983 F.2d 495, 504 (3d Cir.1992).

Taylor v. Reading Co.

23 F.R.D. 186 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1958

See McCullough V. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 1915, 61 Pa.Super. 384 ; Frazier v. … Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 ; Brown v. Moore, 3 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 711 .