Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.58s

  • Coleman v. Stanziani

    570 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1983

    Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … Commonwealth v. Kiker, 289 Pa.Super. 188 , 432 A.2d 1115 (1981). Specifically, the courts have quashed appeals from detention orders as interlocutory. In the Matter of Brown, 268 Pa.Super. 562 , 408 A.2d 1146 (1979).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • HARRIS v. COLE

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2023

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … The Board retains jurisdiction to recommit a parolee convicted of a crime committed while on parole even after his original maximum sentence has expired. See 61 PA.C.S. § 6138(a)(1); e.g., Wolfe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Narin v. Lower Merion School District

    24 F. Supp. 2d 465 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1998

    Id. at 1067 (quoting Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 764 (3d Cir.1994)); see also Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc., 130 F.3d 1101, 1108 (3d Cir.1997)(en bane); Lawrence v. … The Third Circuit follows the guidelines set out in Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) in determining whether to apply the continuing violation theory. Id.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Move Organization v. City of Philadelphia

    530 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1982

    First, defendants point out that under Monell v. … See, e.g., Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 , 476 (3d Cir. 1978); cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); Henderson v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • The Marie Palmer

    173 F. 569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1909

    New Haven Steam-Boat Co. v. Mayor, etc. (D. … Ency. of Eaw (2d Ed.) p. 231, § 3; Charleton v. Cotesworth, 24 E. C. L. 408; Carr v. Austin, etc., Co. (C. C.) 14 Fed. 419 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goff v. Kutztown University

    63 F. Supp. 3d 475 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2014

    of Regents v. … Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Rankin, 483 U.S. at 384 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 ; Connick, 461 U.S. at 140 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Quality Shoe Shop, Inc.

    212 F. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1914

    Ludlow, Trustee, v. Pugh, 213 Fed. 450 , 130 C. C. A. 96 ), the pending controversy will now be disposed of. … The board of directors of the stockholders of the Quality Shoe Shop never held any meetings after February 22, 1913, did they? “A. X do not think they did. No; they did not. “Q.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Steckler v. Pennroad Corp.

    44 F. Supp. 800 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1942

    Railroad Co. v. Flynn, 233 App. … Attorney General v. New York, N. H. & H. Railroad Co., 198 Mass. 413 , 84 N.E. 737 ; Brown et al. v. Boston & Maine R. R., 233 Mass. 502 , 124 N.E. 322 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • The Bermuda

    3 F. Cas. 270 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1866

    Co. v. Pratt, 2 Bin. 308 ,) there was no question of either false destination or contraband property of any hind. … Such an act, when perpetrated by the master so as to involve a forfeiture of the vessel, or of goods on board, is within the definition of barratry. See Earle v. Rowcroft, 8 East, 126.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation Inc.

    71 F. Supp. 2d 464 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1999

    A “public body” is defined to include all of the following: (1) A state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board, commission, council, authority or other body in the executive branch of State government. (2) A … O’Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake, 518 U.S. 712 , 116 *474 S.Ct. 2353, 135 L.Ed.2d 874 (1996); Board of County Commissioners v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Press v. McNeal

    568 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1983

    Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir. 1977) (emphasis added). See also Nemeroff v. Abelson, 620 F.2d 339, 349 (2d Cir.1980). … See, e.g., Shaffer v. Commissioner, 515 F.Supp. 748 (E.D.La.1981); Lynch v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Spearman v. Sterling Steamship Company

    171 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1959

    The leading case in this area is Orange Theatre Corporation v. … See Bartner v. Debiasse, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1957, 20 F.R.D. 355 ; Juszczak v. Huber Mfg Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y.1953, 13 F.R.D. 434 ; Kaufman v. United States, D.C.D.C.1940, 35 F.Supp. 900 .

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital

    234 F. Supp. 2d 494 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2002

    of Medicine and the Board, which rules and regulations shall be implemented by the Board. *500 63 P.S. § 212(1). 3 A medical diagnosis is commonly understood to be an identification of a disease based on its signs and symptoms … Ryther v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • PAULSON v. KELLY

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 2020

    State Parole Board, 184 F. … See Brown, 339 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ZYSK v. THERM-OMEGA-TECH, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024

    While the board meeting minutes do not describe the actual speaker of the statement, the statement is listed as discussed by the Board. … McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • AMERICAN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. TOLL BROS., INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2022

    The Board is defined as “the Board of Directors of Newtown Walk Community Association, Inc.” … Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PC, 935 F.3d 187, 195 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Revell v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 598 F.3d 128, 134 (3d Cir. 2010)); see also Jenkins v. SEPTA, 801 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • YOUNG v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2020

    See West v. … As the court previously explained to Young, although a municipality is a “person” subject to suit under section 1983, Board of the Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (citing Monell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rota v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks

    338 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1972

    Coleman v. … The internal deliberations of the Board alone constituted no violation of the Act; rather, the Board’s decision is challenged because its purpose and effect were to chastise Giordani for the exercise in New York of what he

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Breiner v. C & P Home Builders, Inc.

    398 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1975

    In Taylor v. … Citing DeJesus v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Country Mutual Insurance Co. v. TOLL BROTHERS, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2022

    The Board is defined as “the Board of Directors of Newtown Walk Community Association, Inc.” … Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PC, 935 F.3d 187, 195 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Revell v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 598 F.3d 128, 134 (3d Cir. 2010)); see also Jenkins v. SEPTA, 801 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.