Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.58s
570 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1983
Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … Commonwealth v. Kiker, 289 Pa.Super. 188 , 432 A.2d 1115 (1981). Specifically, the courts have quashed appeals from detention orders as interlocutory. In the Matter of Brown, 268 Pa.Super. 562 , 408 A.2d 1146 (1979).
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2023
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … The Board retains jurisdiction to recommit a parolee convicted of a crime committed while on parole even after his original maximum sentence has expired. See 61 PA.C.S. § 6138(a)(1); e.g., Wolfe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNarin v. Lower Merion School District
24 F. Supp. 2d 465 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1998
Id. at 1067 (quoting Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 764 (3d Cir.1994)); see also Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc., 130 F.3d 1101, 1108 (3d Cir.1997)(en bane); Lawrence v. … The Third Circuit follows the guidelines set out in Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) in determining whether to apply the continuing violation theory. Id.
Cited 3 timesPublishedMove Organization v. City of Philadelphia
530 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1982
First, defendants point out that under Monell v. … See, e.g., Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomburg State College, 590 F.2d 470 , 476 (3d Cir. 1978); cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 41 (1979); Henderson v.
Cited 7 timesPublished173 F. 569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1909
New Haven Steam-Boat Co. v. Mayor, etc. (D. … Ency. of Eaw (2d Ed.) p. 231, § 3; Charleton v. Cotesworth, 24 E. C. L. 408; Carr v. Austin, etc., Co. (C. C.) 14 Fed. 419 .
Cited 2 timesPublished63 F. Supp. 3d 475 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2014
of Regents v. … Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Rankin, 483 U.S. at 384 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 ; Connick, 461 U.S. at 140 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 .
Cited 6 timesPublished212 F. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1914
Ludlow, Trustee, v. Pugh, 213 Fed. 450 , 130 C. C. A. 96 ), the pending controversy will now be disposed of. … The board of directors of the stockholders of the Quality Shoe Shop never held any meetings after February 22, 1913, did they? “A. X do not think they did. No; they did not. “Q.
Cited 10 timesPublished44 F. Supp. 800 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1942
Railroad Co. v. Flynn, 233 App. … Attorney General v. New York, N. H. & H. Railroad Co., 198 Mass. 413 , 84 N.E. 737 ; Brown et al. v. Boston & Maine R. R., 233 Mass. 502 , 124 N.E. 322 .
Cited 4 timesPublished3 F. Cas. 270 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1866
Co. v. Pratt, 2 Bin. 308 ,) there was no question of either false destination or contraband property of any hind. … Such an act, when perpetrated by the master so as to involve a forfeiture of the vessel, or of goods on board, is within the definition of barratry. See Earle v. Rowcroft, 8 East, 126.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHalstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation Inc.
71 F. Supp. 2d 464 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1999
A “public body” is defined to include all of the following: (1) A state officer, agency, department, division, bureau, board, commission, council, authority or other body in the executive branch of State government. (2) A … O’Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of Northlake, 518 U.S. 712 , 116 *474 S.Ct. 2353, 135 L.Ed.2d 874 (1996); Board of County Commissioners v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996).
Cited 17 timesPublished568 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1983
Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1088 (2d Cir. 1977) (emphasis added). See also Nemeroff v. Abelson, 620 F.2d 339, 349 (2d Cir.1980). … See, e.g., Shaffer v. Commissioner, 515 F.Supp. 748 (E.D.La.1981); Lynch v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSpearman v. Sterling Steamship Company
171 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1959
The leading case in this area is Orange Theatre Corporation v. … See Bartner v. Debiasse, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1957, 20 F.R.D. 355 ; Juszczak v. Huber Mfg Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y.1953, 13 F.R.D. 434 ; Kaufman v. United States, D.C.D.C.1940, 35 F.Supp. 900 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedCorrigan v. Methodist Hospital
234 F. Supp. 2d 494 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 2002
of Medicine and the Board, which rules and regulations shall be implemented by the Board. *500 63 P.S. § 212(1). 3 A medical diagnosis is commonly understood to be an identification of a disease based on its signs and symptoms … Ryther v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 2020
State Parole Board, 184 F. … See Brown, 339 Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownZYSK v. THERM-OMEGA-TECH, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 2024
While the board meeting minutes do not describe the actual speaker of the statement, the statement is listed as discussed by the Board. … McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).
Cited 0 timesUnknownAMERICAN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. TOLL BROS., INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2022
The Board is defined as “the Board of Directors of Newtown Walk Community Association, Inc.” … Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PC, 935 F.3d 187, 195 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Revell v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 598 F.3d 128, 134 (3d Cir. 2010)); see also Jenkins v. SEPTA, 801 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownYOUNG v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2020
See West v. … As the court previously explained to Young, although a municipality is a “person” subject to suit under section 1983, Board of the Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (citing Monell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRota v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks
338 F. Supp. 1176 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1972
Coleman v. … The internal deliberations of the Board alone constituted no violation of the Act; rather, the Board’s decision is challenged because its purpose and effect were to chastise Giordani for the exercise in New York of what he
Cited 7 timesPublishedBreiner v. C & P Home Builders, Inc.
398 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1975
In Taylor v. … Citing DeJesus v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCountry Mutual Insurance Co. v. TOLL BROTHERS, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2022
The Board is defined as “the Board of Directors of Newtown Walk Community Association, Inc.” … Wolfington v. Reconstructive Orthopaedic Assocs. II PC, 935 F.3d 187, 195 (3d Cir. 2019) (quoting Revell v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 598 F.3d 128, 134 (3d Cir. 2010)); see also Jenkins v. SEPTA, 801 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna