Case law

Slater v. Marshall

895 F. Supp. 93 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 1995

Schrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1405 (3d Cir.1991); Markowitz v. Northeast Land Co., 906 F.2d 100, 103 (3d Cir.1990). … In Post , the Supreme Court expressly limited the absolute privilege’s scope and ruled that a defamatory letter was not absolutely privileged when it was copied to a judge, the Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Board and an alleged

Rhoads Industries, Inc. v. Building Materials Corp. of America

254 F.R.D. 238 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2008

Id.; accord Barton v. … As noted by Magistrate Judge Brown, the August 5 and 11 email records did not contain privileged communication and had not been separately logged.

Hutchins v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp.

165 B.R. 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1994

Sapos v. Provident Inst. of Sav., 967 F.2d 918 , 922 (3d Cir.1992); Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988). 2. … Sapos v. Provident Inst. of Sav., 967 F.2d 918 , 928 (3d Cir.1992); Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp., 895 F.2d 123, 128 (3d Cir.1990).

Ostrow Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beal

394 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1975

Seneca Nursing Home v. Kansas State Board of Social Welfare, 490 F.2d 1324 (10th Cir. 1974). … Data Processing Service Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); Seneca Nursing Home v. Kansas State Board of Social Welfare, 490 F.2d 1324 (10th Cir. 1974); Harmony Nursing Home, Inc. v.

Scott Fetzer Co. v. Gehring

288 F. Supp. 2d 696 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2003

In Browning King Co. v. … See Jellibeans, Inc. v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., 716 F.2d 833, 838 (11th Cir.1983); Purolator, Inc. v. EFRA Distributors, Inc., 687 F.2d 554, 559 (1st Cir.1982); Mother Waddles Perpetual Mission, Inc. v.

WHITAKER-JONES v. TULL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2020

See Brown v. City of Philadelphia Office of Human Res., 735 F. … App’x 55, 56 (3d Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (“Brown alleges that the defendants violated various criminal statutes, but most do not provide a private cause of action.”); Brown v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the E.

KREIS v. PALMER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2024

App’x 676, 679 (3d Cir. 2012) (affirming grant of judgment in favor of officer who used a taser to subdue the 73-year-old plaintiff who was resisting arrest); Brown v. Rinehart, 325 F. … App’x at 679; Brown v. Rowan, No. 14-5874, 2016 WL 861331, at *4-6 (E.D. Pa.

DAVIS v. SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE OFFICER SCHERMERHORN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 2024

plaintiff must allege that the defendant’s policies or customs caused the alleged constitutional violation); Brown v. SEPTA, 539 F. … Davis also contends that the SEPTA Officers violated his right to travel during the encounter because they prevented him from boarding the train or subway.

Johnson v. Lit Bros., Inc.

278 F. 279 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1921

A. 484 , and the unreported case of Johnson & Cooper v. Browning, King & Co [3] The opinions of Judges Mayer and Geiger have made any further discussion by us of no moment. … We have been referred to the case of Globe Knitting Works v. Segal, 248 Fed. 495 , 160 C. C. A. 505 , as an authoritative support for these patents.

International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Calabro

312 F. Supp. 2d 697 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2004

See PNC Bank Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Stamos), 831 A.2d 1269, 1282 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003). 4 . … . § 1702(a) (1990); Dowd v. Dowd, 275 Pa.Super. 472 , 418 A.2d 1387 (1980).

The R. B. M. Burke

294 F. 987 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1924

the Burke, there was uncontra-dicted evidence on the part of the libelant that it is customary for barges to tie up at the end of piers, as rvas done with the Burke; The respondent proved regulation 20 promulgated by the Board … of Commissioners of Navigation, which was also proved in the case of The Patricia v.

Nuclear Installation Services Co. v. Nuclear Services Corp.

468 F. Supp. 1187 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1979

Contractor and Subcontractor, as well as with any other parties thereto before one arbitration board which shall determine all of said disputes. (Emphasis added.) … NSC seeks to rely upon El Hoss Engineering and Transport Co. v.

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Stone Container Corp.

497 F. Supp. 2d 666 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 30, 2007

V. DISCUSSION A. … Corrugated sheets are made by gluing a fluted sheet which is not made of liner-board, known as the corrugating medium, between facing sheets of linerboard; corrugated sheets are also referred to as container-board.

Narin v. Lower Merion School District

24 F. Supp. 2d 465 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 1998

Id. at 1067 (quoting Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759, 764 (3d Cir.1994)); see also Keller v. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc., 130 F.3d 1101, 1108 (3d Cir.1997)(en bane); Lawrence v. … The Third Circuit follows the guidelines set out in Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983) in determining whether to apply the continuing violation theory. Id.

McNasby v. Crown Cork & Seal, Inc.

698 F. Supp. 1264 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1988

In Kremer v. … In Davis v.

In re Quality Shoe Shop, Inc.

212 F. 321 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1914

Ludlow, Trustee, v. Pugh, 213 Fed. 450 , 130 C. C. A. 96 ), the pending controversy will now be disposed of. … The board of directors of the stockholders of the Quality Shoe Shop never held any meetings after February 22, 1913, did they? “A. X do not think they did. No; they did not. “Q.

McNeal v. Arcelormittal USA, Inc.

143 F. Supp. 3d 241 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 2015

Brown v. Francis, 75 F.3d 860, 865 (3d Cir.1996) (citing Boyer v. Snap-On tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir.1990); Abels v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 770 F.2d 26, 29 (3d Cir.1995)). … V.

In re Tancrel

227 F. 329 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1915

The objection urged by the Bureau of Naturalization is to the effect that the conditions of naturalization apply to the applicant, except that *330 service on board a merchant ship for three years after the filing of his … S. v. Petersen, 182 Fed. 289 , 104 C. C. A. 571 . The ruling there was that the procedure features of Act June 29, 1906, c. 3592, 34 Stat. 596 , must be followed by applicants within the excepted classes.

Coleman v. Stanziani

570 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1983

Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). … Commonwealth v. Kiker, 289 Pa.Super. 188 , 432 A.2d 1115 (1981). Specifically, the courts have quashed appeals from detention orders as interlocutory. In the Matter of Brown, 268 Pa.Super. 562 , 408 A.2d 1146 (1979).

Goff v. Kutztown University

63 F. Supp. 3d 475 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 2014

of Regents v. … Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Rankin, 483 U.S. at 384 , 107 S.Ct. 2891 ; Connick, 461 U.S. at 140 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 .