Case law

Hrabak v. Hummel

55 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1943

As to the value of medical services, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said in Brown v. … In Fougeray v. Pflieger, 314 Pa. 65 , 170 A. 257, 258 , citing Brown v. White, supra, where the value of a physician’s services had not been proved, Mr.

Brown v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2021

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LASHAWN BROWN : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff … Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983); see also McKenna v. City of Phila., 582 F.3d 447, 455 (3d Cir. 2009).

Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.

428 F. Supp. 663 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1977

In my view, Brown is clearly distinguishable. … Plaintiff has cited no case in which the Brown holding has been extended beyond its own unique facts. The “holding out” theory has not been generally applied. See Slack v.

BROWN v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 2021

Brown v. LM Gen. Ins. Co., No. CV 21-2134, 2021 WL 2333626, at *3 (E.D. Pa. June 7, 2021). The Court previously granted Ms. Brown leave to address the deficiencies in her initial complaint. … Brown’s breach of contract claim and request for a declaratory judgment. Tippett v. Ameriprise Ins. Co., No. CIV.A. 14-4710, 2015 WL 1345442, at *7 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2015).

BROWN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 2021

See Higgs v. … See West v.

Banque-Russo Asiatique London v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

281 F. 886 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1922

The Export Steamship Corporation was at the time the managing operator for the Shipping Board. Charles Kurz had, on February 24, 1920, been made agent for the vessel at Philadelphia.

BROWN v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2021

Brown noticed her intent to seek UIM coverage or when Liberty Mutual transmitted its offer. So, the complaint fails to plead the length of the alleged delay, let alone whether it was unreasonable. See Krantz v. … Brown’s entitlement to stacked coverage limits. Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 506 F. App’x 133, 137 Gd Cir. 2012) (citing Johnson v. Progressive Ins. Co., 987 A.2d 781, 785 (Pa. Super.

Banque-Russo Asiatique-London v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

266 F. 897 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1920

Landis, 261 Fed. 440 , and Perna v. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 266 Fed. 896 , in a recent opinion, and bv Judge Learned Hand, of the Southern district of New York, in the case of Gould *900 Coupler Co. v. U. S.

BROWN v. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2020

Stridiron v. Stridiron, 698 F.2d 204, 206-07 (3rd Cir. 1983); Brown v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 282 F.2d 522, 527 (3rd Cir. 1960). … administrative and school board decision making, as well as colleagues.

BROWN v. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2020

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH BROWN, et. al. … Barley v. Fox Chase Cancer Ctr., 54 F. Supp. 3d 396, 400 (E.D.

BROWN v. UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2020

Glover v. F.D.I.C., 698 F.3d 139, 146 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Baldwin Cty. Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984)). … City of Los Angeles v. Heller, 475 U.S. 796, 799 (1986); Hill v.

Thompson v. Montemuro

383 F. Supp. 1200 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1974

Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey-State Prison, supra, 407 F.2d at 940. … Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (3d Cir. 1969); Buszka v.

BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 2020

Schwartz v. Halter, 134 F. Supp. 2d 640, 647 (E.D. Pa. 2001); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971); Doak v. Heckler, 790 F.2d 26, 28 (3d Cir. 1986); Newhouse v. … Bittel v. Richardson, 441 F.2d 1193, 1195 (3d Cir. 1971); Lyons v. Heckler, 638 F. Supp. 706, 710 (E.D. Pa. 1986).

HARLEY v. PA PAROLE BOARD

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 2025

Block v. Potter, 631 F.2d 233, 236 (3d Cir. 1980). The Board has broad discretion in determining parole decisions. 61 Pa.C.S. §§ 6135, 6137; Com. v. … Kentucky Dept. of Corr. v.

Food, Tobacco, Agricultural & Allied Workers Union of America, Local 186 v. Smiley

74 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1946

Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 349 , 63 S. Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ; 1 Moore, Federal Practice (1938), Section 8.06. … Remington Rand Inc., 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869 ; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. N. L.R.B., 8 Cir., 104 F.2d 49, 55 ; N.L.R.B. v. Highland Park Mfg. Co., 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 632, 640 .

United States v. Lansdowne Swim Club

713 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1989

See Anderson v. Pass Christian Isles Golf Club, Inc., 488 F.2d 855, 857 (5th Cir.1974); United States v. Richberg, 398 F.2d 523, 529 (5th Cir.1968); Nesmith v. YMCA, 397 F.2d 96 , 101 (4th Cir.1968); Brown v. … See Board of Directors of Rotary Int'l v.

BROWN v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2019

Co. v. … In Resolution Trust Corp. v.

Callahan v. Scott Paper Co.

541 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1982

In Geary v. … Callahan and Brown are represented by the same counsel. 2 . Although plaintiffs also pray for injunctive relief — as to which a somewhat different standard for standing may be applicable, see Schoenkopf v.

Hoeber ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. KNZ Construction, Inc.

879 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1995

Eisenberg v. Wellington Hall, 651 F.2d at 906-07. … NLRB v. Garry Mfg. Co., 630 F.2d 934, 938 (3d Cir.1980); Hedstrom Co. v. NLRB, 629 F.2d 305 (3d Cir.1980).

United States Ex Rel. Caputo v. Sharp

282 F. Supp. 362 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1968

In the instant case, relator’s board could not have failed to have had notice of his claim, since it was the board which purportedly reclassified him as IV-F. United States v. … No. 90-40, § 1 (8)-(10), 81 Stat. 104 , 105 notwithstanding, see Moskowitz, supra at 648 ; accord, Brown v. McNamara, (3d Cir., November 24, 1967) 387 F.2d 150 , 152 (by implication).