Case law

Carolan v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2025

For example, in Brown v. LM Gen. Ins. Co., the plaintiff included a list of thirty-eight (38) bare-bone allegations of bad faith in her amended complaint. No. 21-2134, 2021 WL 3809075, at *2 (E.D. Pa. … Like the plaintiff in Brown, Plaintiffs do not allege that Defendant’s claim adjuster was “somehow ill-equipped to perform [her] job.” See Brown, 2019 WL 1651667, at *3.

Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware Works

207 F. 97 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 1913

A. 280 ; Metallic Extraction Co. v. Brown, 110 Fed. 665 , 49 C. C. … In the Brown patent the pulp is removed by a discharging arm which strikes it from the plunger.

Forbes v. Eagleson

19 F. Supp. 2d 352 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1998

Hodges v. … and the board changed the rules.

United States v. Lanigan

534 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1982

Maze, 414 U.S. 395 , 94 S.Ct. 645 , 38 L.Ed.2d 603 (1974); United States v. Brown, 583 F.2d 659 (3d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1217 , 59 L.Ed.2d 456 (1979); United States v. … See United States v. Brown, 583 F.2d 659, 664 (3d Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 909 , 99 S.Ct. 1217 , 59 L.Ed.2d 456 (1979).

RCN Telecom Services, Inc. v. DeLuca Enterprises, Inc.

413 F. Supp. 2d 464 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2005

See Cable Arizona Corp. v. … In this case, DeLuca submitted a Plan to the Hanover Township Board of Supervisors, which designated utility easements throughout the subdivision.

Milan v. American Vision Center

34 F. Supp. 2d 279 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1998

Rolick v. Collins Pine Co., 925 F.2d 661, 664 (3d Cir.1991). … Browning-Ferris, Inc., 158 F.3d 183, 189 (3d Cir.1998). No published case in the Commonwealth has considered the corporate negligence of an optometrist’s office, or more generally of any sort of medical practice.

Wolk v. Olson

730 F. Supp. 2d 376 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2010

Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997). Taken in their totality, Fine and Wilson agree that not all cases are worthy of the discovery rule. Worthy cases are those pertaining to hard-to-discern injuries. … Evans v.

Schwartz v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.

384 F. Supp. 302 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1974

contend that the Insurance Department is lax in allowing the title insurance companies to collect such extra revenues, this does not constitute non-regulation for purposes of the Mc-Carran-Ferguson Act, see Ohio AFL-CIO v. … Insurance Rating Board [ 451 F.2d 1178 (6th Cir. 1971)] cited at 374 F.Supp. p. 576, and especially the dissent of Mr.

The Norman

6 F. 406 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1881

He saw the coal coming on board, and knew that Murray, Perris & Co. procured it, as they were bound to do. … Rep. 665, and Goal Co. v. The Secret, U. S. C. C., S. D. N. Y., December 1, 1879 (not reported), closely resemble the case before me.

WILLIAMS v. THE GEO GROUP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2025

Brown.” (Id.) Richburg allegedly “smushed” Williams’s face to the floor and put his knee into Williams’s back, while Brown “sadistically punch[ed] and kick[ed]” Williams until he could “no longer move.” (Id.) … Natale v. Camden County Corr. Facility, 318 F.3d 575, 583-84 (3d Cir. 2003) (citing Bd. of the Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997)); Sims v. Wexford Health Sources, 635 F.

United States v. Wade

653 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1984

United States v. Argent Corp., No. 83-523-HB (D.N.M. Dec. 20, 1983); United States v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical, 579 F.Supp. 823 (W.D. Mo.1984); United States v. Reilly Tar & Chemical, No. 4-80 Civil 469 (D.Minn. … See Robinson v. Brown, 320 F.2d 503 (6th Cir.1963), cert, denied, 376 U.S. 908 , 84 S.Ct. 662 , 11 L.Ed.2d 607 (1964).

Crompton v. Park Ward Motors, Inc.

477 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1979

Dow Chemical Co., 384 F.Supp. 423, 429 (E.D.Pa.1974), Sun Oil Co. of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry, 365 F.Supp. at 1406, Resident Advisory Board v. Tate, 329 F.Supp. 427, 432 (E.D.Pa.1971). … DiCesare-Engler Productions, Inc. v.

Conjour v. Whitehall Township

850 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1994

City of Scranton, 598 F.Supp. 26, 30-32 (M.D.Pa. 1984); Gallagher v. Board of Comm’rs, 438 Pa. 280 , 283, 264 A.2d 699 , 701 (1970); Snizaski v. Zaleski, 410 Pa. 548, 549 , 189 A.2d 284 (1963); Manning v. Civil Serv. … The right invoked by the plaintiff was first established in Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Benner v. Philadelphia Musical Society

32 F.R.D. 197 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1963

In my previous opinion in this case 1 (Associated Orchestra Leaders of Greater Philadelphia v. … , and ask this Court to vindicate, their right to conduct their business upon the basis of free competition and without the predatory conduct and restraint of trade inherent in the unilateral imposition by the Executive Board

Berkery v. United States

767 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1990

See Pinewood Estates v. *661 Barnegat Township Leveling Board, 898 F.2d 347 , 349-50 n. 4 (3d Cir.1990) (treatment under 12(b)(6) is "undoubtedly the correct approach”); Lunderstadt v. … Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321 , 91 S.Ct. 795 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (1971). See Pietanza v.

De Mateos v. Texaco Panama, Inc.

417 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1976

In Kontos v. S.S. … Hellenic Lines Ltd. v.

Jackson v. Heckler

580 F. Supp. 1077 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1984

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971), quoting Consolidated Edison v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938); Smith v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474, 480 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 460 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Cotter v. Harris, 642 F.2d 700, 705 (3d Cir.1981).

Texaco, Inc. v. Harrison

30 F.R.D. 127 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1962

The case of Azar v. Markle, 311 Pa. 296 , 166 A. 889 (1933) is directly on point. … Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.S. 364, 370 , 59 S.Ct. 301 , 83 L.Ed. 221 *129 (1939); Jones v.

Rossi v. McCloskey and Company

149 F. Supp. 638 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1957

Black & Yates, Inc., v. Mahogany Ass’n, Inc., 3 Cir., 1942, 129 F.2d 227 , 148 A.L.R. 841 ; Feddersen Motors, Inc., v. Ward 10 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 519 ; Nelson Radio & Supply Co., Inc., v. … . § 141 et seq., affords a proper basis for plaintiffs’ action against the Union and its officers, and the National Labor Relations Board, a proper forum, need not here be decided. See Born v.

Flex v. Allentown Police Pension Fund Association

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 2025

Chainey v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972).