Case law

DOROSHIN v. FRY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2024

Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant failed to consider exculpatory evidence submitted the conduct board following his expulsion. Id. ¶ 24. I. … V.

Williams v. Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc.

345 F. Supp. 3d 590 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 2018

He appealed that ruling to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review ("UCBR") to no avail: the Board affirmed the decision of the referee. … ."); Rue v.

Cohen v. Standard Insurance

155 F. Supp. 2d 346 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 2001

Bradley Fancher who is board certified in internal medicine, and Dr. Henry DeMots who is a board certified cardiologist and professor of cardiology at Oregon Health Sciences University. More specifically, Dr. … See Levinson v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.

In re Certainteed Fiber Cement Siding Litigation

303 F.R.D. 199 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 2014

for the number of boards on the entire wall section. b. … and will be prorated based on the actual number of boards with Qualifying Damage plus any necessary boards immediately above or below the affected boards.

Bucks County Department of Mental Health/Mental Retardation v. De Mora

227 F. Supp. 2d 426 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2002

Four v. … First, Woodside v. Philadelphia Board of Education, 248 F.3d 129 (3d Cir.2001), is distinguishable from the case at bar because it involved an award of attorney’s fees.

In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

333 F. Supp. 2d 333 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2004

June 2, 2004) (“Linerboard V”). … Corrugated sheets are made by gluing a fluted sheet which is not made of liner-board, known as the corrugating medium, between facing sheets of linerboard; corrugated sheets are also referred to as container-board.

Greenspun v. Schlindwein

578 F. Supp. 1203 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1984

See Press v. McNeal, 568 F.Supp. 256, 258 (E.D.Pa.1983), quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. … See United States v. Starks, 515 F.2d 112 , 121 n. 11 (3d Cir.1975).

Friedrich v. U.S. Computer Services

787 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1991

See Boutell Service Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 463 , 471 n. 9, 66 S.Ct. 631 , 635 n. 9, 90 L.Ed. 786 (1945); see also Morris v. … Plaintiffs admit often carrying small expendable replacement parts, and very rarely a personal computer board or tandem board, see Responses to Requests for Admissions, No. 10 (Friedrich, Hall, Omvig, Wasneski), No. 8 (Harahan

The Mary F. Barrett

270 F. 618 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1921

Chrystal v. Flint (D. C.) 82 Fed. 472 . … It is so well and fully set forth in the dissenting opinion in the Irrawaddy Case and in the opinion of Judge Brown in Chrystal v. Flint that any attempted restatement of it would weaken it.

Keenan v. Metropolitan District Council of Philadelphia

266 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1966

Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 3 Cir., 365 F.2d 802 , 809. … It is true that in San Diego, etc., Union Local 2020 v.

Popkin v. Jacoby (In Re Sunrise Securities Litigation)

108 B.R. 471 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1989

Carter v. … In Bane v.

Mitchell v. W.S. Cumby & Son, Inc.

704 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 3, 1989

In Hayes v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 61 Pa.Commw. 479, 434 A.2d 232, 234 (1981) (actual control must be demonstrated; right to control insufficient); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v.

Wolk v. Olson

730 F. Supp. 2d 376 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 2010

Brown, 549 Pa. 217 , 701 A.2d 164, 167 (1997). Taken in their totality, Fine and Wilson agree that not all cases are worthy of the discovery rule. Worthy cases are those pertaining to hard-to-discern injuries. … Evans v.

McIntyre v. Philadelphia Suburban Corp.

90 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2000

Both the 1988 and 1994 Stock Option Plans are administered by a Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of PSC (“the Committee”). … Similarly, in Weir v.

Jagielski v. Package MacHine Co.

489 F. Supp. 232 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1980

Morrison v. California 291 U.S. 82 , 54 S.Ct. 281 , 78 L.Ed. 664 (1934), Ammlung v. City of Chester, 494 F.2d 811 (3d Cir. 1974). 2 . Rushton v. Shea, 419 F.Supp. 1349 (D.Del.1976). 3 . Webb v. … Healthy Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977), Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Wetzel, 424 U.S. 737 , 96 S.Ct. 1202 , 47 L.Ed.2d 435 (1976). 10 . 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (c). 11 .

In re Auto Safety Signal Lamp Co.

237 F. 299 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1916

president, while he (Mellor) was treasurer of the company, and which payments Mellor charged to commissions pretended to be due him for sale of stock, under an alleged agreement between him and the executive committee of the board … Wiswall v. Campbell, 93 U. S. 347 , 23 L. Ed. 923 ; In re Blake (C. C. A. 8th Cir.) 17 Am. Bankr. Rep. 668, 150 Fed. 279 , 80 C. C.

First Delaware Valley Citizens Television, Inc. v. CBS, Inc.

398 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1975

The Review Board in the FCC proceedings has determined that the refusal of CBS to lease the present transmitter site to the plaintiff, was not a violation of the FCC rules. … Inc. v. Pacific Tel. & Tel.

Gilberton Contracting Co. v. Hook

267 F. Supp. 393 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1967

Confusion Of Goods § 5, pp. 550-552; Brown on Personal Property § 32, p. 67 (2d ed. 1955) see Engel’s Estate, 413 Pa. 475, 478 , 198 A.2d 505 (1964) and other cases cited therein. 3. … Com. for use of Lewistown Trust Co. v. Nestler et al., 312 Pa. 484, 486 , 167 A. 354 (1933); Brennan v. Pittston Brewing Corp., 344 Pa. 495, 497, 498 , 26 A.2d 334 (1942). 6.

Moore v. Celebrezze

252 F. Supp. 593 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1966

Hobby v. Hodges, 215 F.2d 754 (10 Cir. 1954); Saxon v. Celebrezze, 241 F.Supp. 152 (W.D.S.C.1965); Norkey v. Celebrezze, 225 F.Supp. 754 (E.D.Pa.1963); Lovingood v. Celebrezze, 218 F.Supp. 834 (S.D.S.C.1963); Rivers v. … As stated in Phillip v.

Institute for Scientific Information, Inc. v. Gordon & Breach

743 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1990

In United States Shoe Corp. v. … Damron v. Smith, 616 F.Supp. 424, 425 (D.C.Pa.1985).