Case law

APOIAN v. American Home Products Corp.

111 F. Supp. 2d 627 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2000

See Mints v. Educational Testing Service, 99 F.3d 1253, 1258 (3d. Cir.1996) (court may consider award of attorneys fees after a case has been remanded) (citing Cooler & Gell v. … B. to Response), there has never been a meeting of the board of directors of WALCO, and thus no minutes; board business is conducted by unanimous written consent. (Testimony of Douglas Y.

Rightmyer v. Philly Pregnancy Center, P.C.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 2024

(3) In the event the defendant physician is certified by an approved board, be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, … Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001). “The Supreme Court has made clear that Section 1981 reaches only purposeful discrimination.” Tucker v. City of Phila., 2017 WL 5010032, at *3 (E.D. Pa.

American Dredging Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.

175 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1959

Crumady v. The J. H. Fisser, 1959, 358 U.S. 423 , 79 S.Ct. 445 , 3 L.Ed.2d 413 ; Weyerhaeuser S.S. Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., 1958, 355 U.S. 563 , 78 S.Ct. 438 , 2 L.Ed.2d 491 ; Hagans v. … Farrell Lines, Inc., 3 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 477 ; Brown v. American-Hawaiian S.S. Co., 3 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 16 . These cases are binding upon this court.

Constand v. Cosby

112 F. Supp. 3d 308 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 2015

Cipollone v. Liggett Grp., Inc., 785 F.2d 1108 , 1121 (3d Cir.1986); see also Shingara v. … Bill , Cosby Speaks .at the 50th Anniversary, Commemoration of the Brown v.

Provident Indemnity Life Insurance v. Durbin

541 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 1981

Tunnell v. Wiley, 514 F.2d 971, 976 (3d Cir. 1975). … As the court in Shenandoah Life Insurance Co. v.

Rannels v. Meridian Bancorp, Inc.

718 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1989

The defendant also functions as a key component for the Federal Reserve Board in its monetary control policies. … Without hesitation, it is clear that we should apply the “rational relationship” test. 5 In Massachusetts Board of Retirement v.

Britton v. Philadelphia Police Department

69 F.R.D. 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1975

Henschel v. Worcester Police Department, 445 F.2d 624 (1st Cir. 1971); United States ex rel. Lee v. Illinois, 343 F.2d 120 (7th Cir. 1965); Green v. Cauthen, 379 F.Supp. 361, 371 (D.S.C. 1974); Sams v. … New York State Board of Parole, 352 F.Supp. 296, 298-299 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); Nugent v. Sheppard, 318 F.Supp. 314, 315 (N.D.Ind. 1970).

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Philadelphia

99 F. Supp. 714 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1951

V. A. v. … Brown v. United States, 263 U.S. 78 , 44 S.Ct. 92 , 68 L.Ed. 171”.

Dill v. Scuka

198 F. Supp. 808 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1961

See Norwood v. Kirkpatrick, 1955, 349 U.S. 29 , 75 S.Ct. 544 , 99 L.Ed. 789 ; All States Freight, Inc. v. Modarelli, 3 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 1010 ; Brown v. Woodring, D.C.M.D.Pa.1959, 174 F.Supp. 640 . … In Hoffman v.

United States v. Johns

742 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1990

Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974); e.g., Chevron Oil Co. v. … In contexts other than mail fraud, the Supreme Court has recognized property rights to such “ethereal” concepts as employment, see Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Lawson v. City of Coatesville

42 F. Supp. 3d 664 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2014

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 407-08 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .

Eisenberg v. Mathews

420 F. Supp. 1274 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1976

Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State College et al., 538 F.2d 53, 62 (3d Cir. 1976). Under the Wood v. … United States, 515 F.2d 926, 932 (10th Cir. 1975); Singleton v. Vance County Board of Education, 501 F.2d 429, 433 (4th Cir. 1974); States Marine Lines, Inc. v. Shultz, 498 F.2d 1146, 1156-57 (4th Cir. 1974); Marsh v.

Miller v. United States

561 F. Supp. 1129 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1983

See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 623 n. 35 (2d Cir.1980); Peck v. United States, 470 F.Supp. 1003, 1017 (S.D.N.Y. 1979); Crain v. Krehbiel, 443 F.Supp. 202, 214 (N.D.Cal.1977); Huey v. … Brown v. T.W. Phillips Gas and Oil Co., 195 F.2d 643 . Reitmeyer v. Sprecher, 431 Pa. 284 ; 243 A.2d 395 (1968) is distinguishable.

Walck v. Discavage

741 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1990

Plaintiff claims injuries sustained in a fall on board the vessel. … Kocian v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co., 707 F.2d 748, 753 (3d Cir.1983) (emphasis added); see also Schafer v. Board of Public Education of the School District of Pittsburgh, 903 F.2d 243, 250 (3d Cir.1990).

Heiselmoyer v. Pennsylvania Railroad

17 F.R.D. 88 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1954

The basic problem involved here revolves around Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 , 67 S.Ct. 385 , 91 L.Ed. 451 ; Alltmont v. … Plaintiff, in support of his motion, relies largely upon Reynolds v. United States, 3 Cir., 192 F.2d 987 , 991 and Morrone v. Southern Pac. Co., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 214 .

Rannels v. Meridian Bancorp, Inc.

718 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 8, 1989

The defendant also functions as a key component for the Federal Reserve Board in its monetary control policies. … Without hesitation, it is clear that we should apply the "rational relationship" test. [5] In Massachusetts Board of Retirement v.

McNeely & Price Co. v. The Lambrook

100 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1951

There is, however, evidence beyond Captain Orr’s testimony which strongly supports the Court’s finding, and, in this respect, the case is radically different from McNeely & Price Co. v. … bill, together with the opinion of an expert who fixed the time of the wetting as subsequent to the shipment of the goods, justified Judge Kalodner’s conclusion that the bales had been wet after having been received on board

Lekich v. International Business MacHines Corp.

469 F. Supp. 485 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1979

V. … Defendant, relying on Glenn v.

Fischer & Porter Co. v. Moorco International Inc.

869 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 25, 1994

After the bids were submitted the Fischer & Porter Board decided to accept the bid submitted by Moor-co. … Thereafter the Fischer & Porter Board decided to terminate its agreement with Moorco and to merge with Elsag Bailey.

United States v. Belgrave

351 F. Supp. 686 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1972

(N.T. page 142) The defendant concedes the jury’s verdict establishes that he received the draft board’s notice, which was mailed on March 19, 1970. … On October 13, 1969, Belgrave went to his local board to request duplicate registration cards, and at that time he gave the same address.