Case law

Stair v. Lehigh Valley Carpenters Local Union No. 600

855 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1994

Miller v. Holden, 535 F.2d 912, 915 (5th Cir.1976). … Macauley v. Boston Typographical Union, 692 F.2d 201, 204 (1st Cir.1982); see also *92 Dept. of Labor v. Alum. Brick & Glass Wkrs., 941 F.2d 1172, 1180 (11th Cir.1991); Caldwell v. Int.

Rich v. North Atlantic & Gulf S.S. Co.

86 F. Supp. 989 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1948

The shipping articles made provision as follows: “No dangerous weapons or grog allowed and none to be brought on board by the crew”. 4. … Jackson v. Pittsburgh S. S. Co., 6 Cir., 131 F.2d 668 , 1943 A.M.C. 885 . In Aguilar v.

Eierman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

637 F. Supp. 225 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1984

Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2852 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420, 439 (1983); Balzeit v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, 569 F.Supp. 986, 988 (N.D.Cal.1983). … Douglass v. Park City Associates, 331 F.Supp. 823, 827 (E.D.Pa.1971).

Highway Paving Company v. Hausman

171 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1959

Snyder v. … Yealy v. Fink, 1862, 43 Pa. 212 ; Burton v. Fulton, 1865, 49 Pa. 151 ; Schwinn v. Gordon, 1938, 134 Pa.Super. 422 , 3 A.2d 926 (a suit against the Secretary of Banking).

Johnson v. Fuller

36 F. Supp. 744 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1940

The complainant further cites Roberts v. … In Lonsdale Securities Corporation v.

Quinn v. Cunningham

879 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1995

See James v. … See, e.g., Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 998 (10th Cir.1991); Black v. Lane, 824 F.2d 561, 562 (7th Cir.1987); Bentley v. Beck, 625 F.2d 70, 70-71 (5th Cir.1980).

Straub v. Jaeger

9 F.R.D. 672 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1950

Chase, 290 U.S. 387 , 54 S.Ct. 211 , 78 L.Ed. 378 , 92 A.L.R. 1499 ; Hunter v. Derby Foods, Inc., 2 Cir., 110 F.2d 970 , 133 A.L.R. 255 ; Sumner v. Brown, 312 Pa. 124 , 167 A. 315 . . Banks v. … Rosenzweig, Admr’x v. Heller, 1931, 302 Pa. 279 , 153 A. 346 . . Hughes v. Lucker, 3 Cir., 174 F.2d 285 . . Funk v. Buckley & Co., Inc., 158 Pa. Super. 586 , 45 A.2d 918 . . Stegner, Admr. v.

Connor v. United States

90 F. Supp. 1005 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1950

See Connor v. United States et al., D.C., 87 F.Supp. 847 . The libellant is a longshoreman who was injured on land on October-5, 1945. while loading- the vessel the S. S. “Tabitha Brown”. … Sikes v. United States, D. C, 8 F.R.D. 34 ; see Anderegg v. United States, 4 Cir., 171 F.2d 127, 128 ; cf. Marino et al. v. United States, D.C., 82 F.Supp. 190 .

Kontos v. S.S. Sophie C.

236 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1964

Daniolos relied on Law 551 of the Greek Workmen’s Compensation Act which covers liability to seamen injured on board ship. … Mavromatis v. United Greek *674 Shipowners Corp., supra; Gonzales v. Isthmian S.S. Co., supra.

Emrick v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

539 F. Supp. 653 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 26, 1982

Specifically, defendant argues that plaintiffs’ failure to allege general “across the Board” discrimination in their EEOC charge deprived it of the opportunity to amicably resolve these issues prior to litigation. Cf. … Mikkilineni v.

In re Wiesen Bros.

135 F. 442 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1905

A. 567 ) that the testimony of all the witnesses was competent, apd' Judge Brown followed this ruling in Re Cooke (D. C.) 109 Fed. 631 . … It is argued on behalf of the petitioning creditor that the testimony of all persons is admissible for the reason given in Wiswall v. Campbell, 93 U. S. 348 , 23 L. Ed. 923 .

Peterson v. Lehigh Valley District Council

83 F.R.D. 474 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1979

The existence of an identifiable policy or practice of discrimination and common application to a defined class are essential to accepting plaintiffs’ “across the board” approach to obtaining (b)(2) certification. … As noted above, establishing this pattern is critical to plaintiffs’ “across the board” approach. Plaintiffs have the burden of establishing that they have met the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(2). Davis v.

United States v. DiPasquale

561 F. Supp. 1338 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 1983

He went to Peter Serubo’s office and there found Peter Serubo and Hank Brown, the comptroller of John’s Chevrolet. The three men then went to Brown’s office and met John Serubo. … Then, Peter Serubo asked Brown whether John’s Chevrolet owed any commissions to Crawford.

Rich v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.

117 F. 751 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 1902

She had on board 5,000 tons of cargo, and was bound for the port of Baltimore, where the rest of her cargo was to be loaded. She was drawing 22 feet 7 inches forward, and 23 feet 6 inches aft. … Co. v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 182 U. S. 414 , 21 Sup. Ct. 835, 45 L. Ed. 1155 . In such a situation, I do not feel disposed to go out of my way to express an opinion upon so important a subject.

Martin v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.

548 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1981

Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 , 78 S.Ct. 1228 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1958). See also Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 299 , 97 S.Ct. 2964 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1086 (1980) and Shaffer v. … Plaintiff argues that Ruger, the majority shareholder in the company, also acts as chairman of the board and chief designer, that he refused to warn the company of inherent dangers and defects known to him in these old model

In re Pancoast

129 F. 643 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1904

Omealy v. Newell, 8 East, 364; Walrond v. Van Moses, 8 Mod. 321; Haggitt v. Iniff, 5 De Gex, M. & G. 910; Cole v. Sherard, 11 Exch. 482. It was said in Omealy v. … It may be added that, as Chief Justice Tilghman remarked in Browne v. Phila. Bank, 6 Serg. & R. 484, 9 Am.

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Green

167 F. Supp. 226 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1958

Yellow Cab Company v. City of Chicago, 7 Cir., 186 F.2d 946 . … Demmert v. Demmert, D.C., 115 F.Supp. 430 .

Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

37 F. Supp. 2d 687 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1999

NCAA v. … See, e.g., Groves v. Alabama State Bd. of Educ., 776 F.Supp. 1518, 1531 (M.D.Ala.1991) (concluding that the Board had arbitrarily selected a minimum cutoff score of 16 on the ACT).

Doughty v. First Pennsylvania Bank N. A.

463 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1978

Upon Barnla’s resignation, the All Board of Directors elected H. K. Sauer as the president and chief executive officer in December 1974. … Kurtz v. Oremland, 33 N.J.Super. 443 , 111 A.2d 100 (1954); Kahn v. Massler, 140 F.Supp. 629 (D.N.J. 1956), aff'd 241 F.2d 47 (3d Cir. 1957). 3.

United States Ex Rel. Pope v. Hendricks

326 F. Supp. 699 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 1971

Ford v. Board of Mgrs. of the New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (3rd Cir. 1969), and cases cited therein; United States ex rel. Keen v. Mazurkiewicz, 306 F.Supp. 483 (E.D.Pa.1969). 3. … Bradford Audio Corp. v. Pious, 392 F.2d 67 (2nd Cir. 1968); Penn v. Stumpf, 308 F.Supp. 1238 (N.D.Calif.1970); Commonwealth of Pa. ex rel. Feiling v. Sincavage, 313 F.Supp. 967 (W.D.Pa.1970).