Case law

Esteves v. Bondy

189 F.R.D. 148 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1999

The Board of Arbitrators awarded Anita Esteves the sum of $75,000, which was docketed on February 19, 1999. … See Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp., 841 F.2d at 517 .

Magel v. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

776 F. Supp. 200 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1991

School Board of Nassau County, Florida v. … Laws v. Commw., Philadelphia County Board of Assistance, Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commw. 340, 345 , 412 A.2d 1377, 1380 (1980). See also, Strathie v.

Pennsylvania v. Petito

476 F. Supp. 384 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1979

In Hudson County Board v. Morales, 581 F.2d 379 (3d Cir. 1978), police seized from defendant’s car a substantial amount of cash upon which the IRS issued a levy to satisfy federal income taxes claimed from defendant. … Defendant cites People of California v. Bozarth, 356 F.Supp. 667 (N.D.Cal. 1973) and New Jersey v.

McNeely & Price Co. v. The Lambrook

100 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1951

There is, however, evidence beyond Captain Orr’s testimony which strongly supports the Court’s finding, and, in this respect, the case is radically different from McNeely & Price Co. v. … bill, together with the opinion of an expert who fixed the time of the wetting as subsequent to the shipment of the goods, justified Judge Kalodner’s conclusion that the bales had been wet after having been received on board

Williams v. Frame

821 F. Supp. 1093 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 17, 1993

Freeman v. Rideout, 808 F.2d 949, 951-52 (2d Cir.1986); Vines v. Howard, 658 F.Supp. 34 (E.D.Pa.1987). 3. … Jackson v. Walters, 733 F.Supp. 33 (W.D.Pa.1989).

In re Neill-Pinckney-Maxwell Co.

170 F. 481 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1909

Wilkinson desired that the assignment should be made pursuant to a resolution passed by the board of direel ors of the company, and on September 27th a meeting of the board of directors was called and held, at which resolutions … Bryan and In re Wolf Company, above referred to, as well as the case of Irish v. Citizens’ Trust Co. of Utica (D. C.) 21 Am. Bankr.

United States v. Green

28 F. Supp. 549 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1939

The error alleged by the plaintiff is the Commissioner’s acceptance of the interpretation of the statute by the Circuit Courts in Warner v. Walsh, 2 Cir., 15 F.2d 367 ; United States v. … Bolster, 1 Cir., 26 F.2d 760 , 59 A.L.R. 491 ; Allen v.

Raucci v. Candy & Toy Factory

145 F. Supp. 3d 440 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 2015

Buck v. Hampton Twp. Sch. Dist., 452 F.3d 256, 260 (3d Cir.2006). Copyright registration certificates are public records that may be properly considered on a motion to dismiss. See Brown v. S. Fla. … McGuire Performance Solutions, Inc. v. Massengill, 904 A.2d 971, 975-76 (Pa.Super.2006) (citing Brown v. Esposito, 157 Pa.Super. 147 , 42 A.2d 93, 94 (1945)). Raucci has alleged an assignment from CRE8 to himself.

DETTY v. BECK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 1, 2025

Detty asked Brown to supply gloves and paper masks, but Brown did not do so, although he said that he would order them hot meals once they were done. (Id. at 9, ¶ 73.) … See Brown v. Smith, No. 23-780, 2024 WL 4094279, at *6 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 5, 2024) (citing cases); see also Keenan v.

In Re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation

292 F. Supp. 2d 631 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2003

As an example, in Lazy Oil Co. v. … Corrugated sheets are made by gluing a fluted sheet which is not made of liner-board, known as the corrugating medium, between facing sheets of linerboard; corrugated sheets are also referred to as container-board.

Slotterback Ex Rel. Slotterback v. Interboro School District

766 F. Supp. 280 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 13, 1991

Board of Educ. of Westside Community Schools v. … Board of Educ. of Westside Community Schools v.

United Cement, Lime & Gypsum Workers' International Union, AFL-CIO, Local No. 55 v. Allentown-Portland Cement Co.

163 F. Supp. 816 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1958

Co. v. … Also see, Insurance Agents, etc., v. Prudential Ins. Co., D.C.E.D.Pa.1954, 122 F.Supp. 869 ; Post Publishing Co. v. Cort, 1956, 334 Mass. 199 , 134 N.E.2d 431 ; Wilson Bros. v.

Jones v. Amerihealth Caritas

95 F. Supp. 3d 807 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2015

Brown v. Philip Morris, Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir.2001) (citation omitted) (alteration in original). … We decline Defendants' invitation to impose a heightened pleading standard on Plaintiff *814 and employ the "factor by factor” comparison from Strag v. Board of Trustees, Craven Cmty.

Bituminous Insurance Companies v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n

427 F. Supp. 539 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1976

In Brown v. … The requirement described in Brown v.

SEALS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2025

The data uncovered for Plaintiff Brown during discovery did not list overtime hours. … As for Plaintiff Brown, that payroll data is disputed. Mot. at 3.

Cooper v. Perkiomen Airways, Ltd.

526 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1981

Subsequently, plaintiff learned that a National Transportation Safety Board investigation indicated that the FAA may also be liable. … See generally, Frey v. Woodard, 481 F.Supp. at 1154, n.3 . 10 . Rosario v.

U-Fuel, Inc. (NV) v. Highland Tank & Manufacturing Co.

228 F. Supp. 2d 597 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 4, 2002

See Lemelson v. Gen. … Brown Minneapolis Tank began making and selling double wall, non-insulated ASTs in 1988. These tanks received a UL 142 listing shortly thereafter. Defs.’Ex. 10. 6 .

Perelman v. Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust

432 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1977

Later in TSC Industries, Inc. v. … To the court’s statement in SEC v.

Talley v. Feldman

941 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1996

RLA disputes are resolved by the National Mediation Board, while LMRDA disputes are resolved by the Department. See Crowley, 467 U.S. at 568 , 104 S.Ct. at 2582 (LMRDA); Switchmen’s Union of N. Am. v. … Wirtz v.

Cornell Companies, Inc. v. Borough of New Morgan

512 F. Supp. 2d 238 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 31, 2007

The Borough- changed the definitions for “School” and “Boarding School” and permitted a “Boarding School or similar facility” by right in the “I” Industrial Zoning District. … Cornell relies on two Pennsylvania state court cases, Petrosky v. Zoning Hearing Board, 485 Pa. 501 , 402 A.2d 1385 (1979), and Three Rivers Youth v.