Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.61s
45 F. 497 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1891
Brown’s first signal. … She had a pilot on board, who was.in control of her movements and also those of the tug.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 2024
LITIGATION : THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : : SHELIA BROWN … : CIVIL ACTION : v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 2024
: CIVIL ACTION : v. … See PTO No. 9558, Brown v. Am. Home Prods., Civ. A. No. 99-20593 (Doc. # 5413).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2024
BROWN, : Plaintiff, : : v. … (citing Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993)); Harris v. McMullen, 609 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2024
On March 30, 2021, Plaintiffs boarded a flight from New Orleans to Philadelphia operated by Defendant. (Compl. ¶ 7.) … As others were still boarding, a flight attendant told Plaintiff Brown that she needed to place her purse on the floor. (Id. ¶ 12.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2024
On March 30, 2021, Plaintiffs boarded a flight from New Orleans to Philadelphia operated by Defendant. (Compl. ¶ 7.) … As others were still boarding, a flight attendant told Plaintiff Brown that she needed to place her purse on the floor. (Id. ¶ 12.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 2023
Since the filing of the report, Brown’s other criminal actions have also been dismissed for lack of prosecution, resulting in Brown’s release from prison. See Docket, Commonwealth v. Brown, No. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2023
The Opt-In Plaintiffs would have another 75 days to redeem the check, and any remaining funds would be distributed, cy pres, to the Pennsylvania IOLTA Board. (Id.) … Marby v. Hildebrandt, Civil 6 Specifically, a significant litigation risk favoring settlement was the Third Circuit’s decision in Fischer v. Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CODY BROWN, individually and behalf of all CIVIL ACTION others similarly … situated, Plaintiffs, NO. 22-1097-KSM v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 2023
See Weber v. … .”); Baker v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. KADENCE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 2023
Brown. … Brown has no objection, is in exchange for Mr. Brown’s service award. (See Draft H’rg. Tr. 25:16–26:3.) substantial precedent from [the Third] Circuit supporting approval of incentive payments.” See Somogyi v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 2021
See Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011); see also Snyder v. Bender, 548 F. App’x 767, 771 (3d Cir. 2013). … May 7, 2014) (citing generally Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 2023
As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes his allegations liberally. Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 244-45 (3d Cir. 2013)). … McTernan v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 2022
Heller v. Shaw Indus., Inc., 167 F.3d 146, 156 (3d Cir. 1999). The court held that Dr. … Finally, this court must consider relevant factors under Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2021
Petersen’s attending board-certified cardiologist, Ghiyath Tabbal, M.D., F.H.R.S., setting forth his opinion that Ms. … Reilly v. United States, 863 F.2d 149, 158 (1st Cir. 1988).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2022
Brown’s fraud-based claims in Counts V, VIII, IX, and XI are dismissed. … Brown’s fraud claims are based on the failure-to-warn. 9 Brown’s four fraud claims are Count V (common law fraud), Count VIII (constructive fraud), Count IX (negligent misrepresentation), and Count XI (a
Cited 0 timesUnknownBROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 2021
As Brown is proceeding pro se, the Court construes his allegations liberally. Vogt v. Wetzel, 8 F.4th 182, 185 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc., 704 F.3d 239, 244-45 (3d Cir. 2013)). III. … Brown will not be granted leave to amend his Complaint, because to do so would be futile. Grayson v. Mayview State Hosp., 293 F.3d 103, 110 (3d Cir. 2002).
Cited 0 timesUnknownZurich American Ins. Co. v. Rite Aid Corp.
345 F. Supp. 2d 497 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2004
and Chief Executive Officer, and Franklin Brown, then-Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Legal Officer. … The Liability Arbitration Panel also found that, other than Grass and Brown, none of the Board members were aware of the Bank of America loans and that the Board had not approved the payments for LTIP I and LTIP II.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 27, 2021
] done across the board,” such that the criteria does not change from person to person. … Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), where the Supreme Court held that a teacher spoke as a citizen when he sent a letter to the local newspaper criticizing how the school board had handled past proposals on raising
Cited 0 timesUnknownJeffrey M. Brown Associates, Inc. v. CRK Contracting of Suffolk, Inc.
124 F. Supp. 2d 895 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 2000
Co. v. Romani, 513 A.2d 437 , 355 Pa.Super. 296 (1986); see also RESTATEMENT OF CONTRACTS (SECOND) §§ 261 and 263 (1979). 2. … Brown Associates, Inc., in the total amount of $92,716.00. 1 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna