Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.47s
McQuilken v. a & R DEVELOPMENT CORP.
576 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 1983
Because this case has a relatively complex procedural history and is related to another complex case, Resident Advisory Board v. … Following removal, the case was assigned to this Court as related to Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo. In RAB v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedRother v. Interstate and Ocean Transport Co.
540 F. Supp. 477 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1982
Sarauw v. … See, Moses v.
Cited 5 timesPublished638 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 1986
Alfaro v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 606 F.Supp. 1100, 1107 (E.D.Pa.1985). See also Bruss Co. v. Allnet Communication Services, Inc., 606 F.Supp. 401, 405-06 (N.D.Ill.1985); Chambers Development Co. v. … Browning-Ferris Industries, 590 F.Supp. 1528, 1538 (W.D.Pa.1984). Plaintiffs have not even attempted to set forth a factual basis for their belief that other fraudulent acts have occurred.
Cited 7 timesPublished240 F. Supp. 325 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1965
Smith, 236 F.Supp. 927 (1965), and Kirk v. State Board, 236 F.Supp. 1020 (1964). … See Miller v. Smith, supra, 236 F.Supp. at 931 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedSIMONS v. ROYER COOPER COHEN BRAUNFELD, L.L.C.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2022
(citing Crouse v. Cyclops Indus., 560 Pa. 394, 745 A.2d 606, 611 (2000)). 32 Perelman v. Perelman, 545 F. App’x 142, 149 (3d Cir. 2013); see Nicolaou v. … Co. v. Edelstein, 637 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown890 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1995
Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988). Substantial evidence has been defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Richardson v. … Allen v. Bowen, 881 F.2d 37, 39-40 (3d Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, supra at 1214.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2025
Brown. But, while Pennsylvania law permits a “bystander liability theory of NIED,” Toney v. Chester Cty. … Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 62 (2011) (quoting Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997).
Cited 0 timesUnknownFedorenko v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
598 F. Supp. 1525 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1984
United States v. Fedorenko, 455 F.Supp. 893 (S.D.Fla.1978). … Daneshvar v. Chauvin, 644 F.2d 1248, 1251 (8th Cir.1981); Acosta v. Gaffney, 558 F.2d 1153, 1155-1156 (3d Cir.1977); United States ex rel Parco v. Morris, 426 F.Supp. 976, 978, n. 4 (E.D.Pa.1977).
Cited 1 timesPublishedKershentsev v. Mascotte Productions, Inc.
781 F. Supp. 339 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 4, 1991
Whitelock v. Leatherman, 460 F.2d 507, 514 (10th Cir.1972). … See Dubern v. Girard Trust Bank, 454 F.2d 565, 570 (3d Cir.1972); Pearl Assurance Co. v. National Ins. Agency, 151 Pa.Super. 146 , 30 A.2d 333 (1943). 11 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedWEINIK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2020
In Brown v. Davita, 09-2892, 2011 WL 5523823 (E.D. Pa. … Thereafter, upon application for review, the Board may take additional testimony and arguments of counsel to reach a Board decision. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCoyle v. Kristjan Palusalu Maritime Co., Ltd.
83 F. Supp. 2d 535 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2000
Coyle alleges that, on May 13, 1998, her husband suffered'personal injuries as a result of a fall while oil board the M/V Kristjan Palusalu, a vessel owned by KPMC. At the time of the alleged injury, Mr. … Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished447 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 1978
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. … Healthy City School District Board of Education v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedUnited States ex rel. Richards v. Rundle
285 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 1968
Commonwealth v. Richards, 198 Pa.Super. 39 , 182 A.2d 291 (1962). … Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 , 83 S.Ct. 373 , 9 L.Ed.2d 285 (1963).
Cited 0 timesPublished328 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 1971
It was -further alleged that the defendant members of the Board of School Directors responded to these sit-ins by (1) obtaining a preliminary injunction, issued ex parte on December 14 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery … DeVita v. Sills, 422 F.2d 1172 (C.A. 3, 1970); Grove Press v. City of Philadelphia, 418 F.2d 82 (C.A. 3, 1969); Cooper v. Hutchinson, 184 F.2d 119 (C.A. 3, 1950).
Cited 5 timesPublishedFeinman v. A. H. Bull S. S. Co.
107 F. Supp. 153 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1952
Larson, Jr., Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co., 7 Cir., 253 F. 914 . … See Byars v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 2 Cir., 155 F.2d 587, 588 ; Bruszew-ski v. Isthmian Steamship Company, 3 Cir., 163 F.2d 720 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedTrinsey v. K. Hovnanian at Upper Merion, Inc.
841 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1994
One of the provisions of FIRREA, 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (j), states that: Except as provided in this section, no court may take any action, except at the request of the board of directors by regulation or order, to restrain or … RTC v. Clarke et al., 812 F.Supp. 48 (E.D.Pa.1992).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Mickman (In Re Mickman)
144 B.R. 259 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 1992
Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988). III. … See United States v. Nicolet, Inc., 857 F.2d 202, 207 (3d Cir.1988).
Cited 3 timesPublished208 F. Supp. 3d 676 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 2016
Petitioner then timely filed objections, primarily arguing that his petition is not successive because he now challenges the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s (“Parole Board’s”) decision to deny him parole, rather … Johnson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedAcevedo v. City of Philadelphia
680 F. Supp. 2d 716 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2010
Hohider v. … If the employee is dissatisfied with the outcome, he may, at his own expense, seek review by the Medical Board and may present to the Board any medical histories, reports, or testimony. (Regulation 32 § 32.0313.)
Cited 5 timesPublishedASPIRA, INC. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2021
See Angino v. Rovner, PC v. Santander Bank, N.A., No. 489 MDA 2014, 2015 WL 6405714, at * 5 (Pa. Super. Ct. … See, e.g., Lockett v. Pa. Dep’t of Corrs., 529 F. App’x 294, 296 (3d Cir. 2013) (applying substantially and materially false standard); Brown v. Montgomery Cnty., 470 F. App’x 87, 91 (3d Cir. 2012) (same).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna