Case law

Hinton v. Devine

633 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1986

Keyishian v. Board of Regents of New York, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967), Secretary of State of Maryland v. Munson, supra. … Elfbrandt v. Russell, supra, Keyishian v. Board of Regents, supra, United States v. Robel, supra.

HIRTLE CALLAGHAN HOLDINGS INC. v. THOMPSON

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2022

Supp. 3d at 236; Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola, 745 F. Supp. 2d 588, 621 (E.D. Pa. 2010). … See e.g., Brown & Brown, 745 F. Supp. 2d at 623 (citing Partners Coffee Co., LLC v. Oceana Servs. & Prods. Co., No. 09-236, 2009 U.S. Dist LEXIS 113209, at *20 (W.D. Pa.

Computerware, Inc. v. Micro Design, Inc. (In Re Micro Design, Inc.)

120 B.R. 363 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1990

Accord, Hanna v. Philadelphia Asbestos Co., 743 F.2d 996, 1000-01 (3d Cir.1984). In Browning v. … See In re Taylor, Federal National Mortgage Ass’n v.

Maxwell v. Enterprise Wall Paper Mfg. Co.

47 F. Supp. 999 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1942

Hawes v. Contra Costa Water Co., 104 U.S. 450 , 26 L.Ed. 827 . … Doctor v. Harrington, 196 U.S. 579 , 25 S.Ct. 355 , 49 L.Ed. 606 . Failure to demand corporate action was excused in Hyams v.

Anzaldua v. WHYY, Inc.

160 F. Supp. 3d 823 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 2016

In Hines v. … . § 541.202 ; Baum v.

Smith v. The Creole

22 F. Cas. 494 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 1852

Milligan v. Wedge. 12 Adol. & E. 742, and cases there cited. But I believe no judge, except Sir .Tohn Nicholl. in The Girolamo [3 Hagg. Adm. 1(59] and other cases in 3 Hagg. … Smith v. Condry, 1 How. 34 .

The O. H. Vessels

177 F. 589 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1910

The contract was originally made with Litchfield, but before the work was begun the master of the barge confirmed the agreement, and the managing owner, who was employed on board as the engineer, also knew of it and gave … Ed. 683 , Insurance Co. v. Baring, 87 U. S. 163 , 22 L. Ed. 250 , The Patapsco, 80 U. S. 329 , 20 L. Ed. 696 , and The Vigilant (C. C. A., 3d Circuit) 151 Fed. 747 , 81 C. C. A. 371 .

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Curtis Bay Towing Co. of Pennsylvania

260 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1966

Smith, supra; Brown & Root v. American Home Assurance, 353 F.2d 113 (5 Cir.) 1965 A.M.C. 2689 , 2693. *513 8. … United States v. Cooper, 200 F.2d 954, 956 (6th Cir. 1953); Indian Towing v.

JAMES v. MCMANUS

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 2024

Judge Sánchez’s analysis in Burns v. … Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 772 F.3d 158, 162 (3d Cir. 2014) (quoting Brown v. Jevic, 575 F.3d 322, 326 (3d Cir. 2009)). 30 City of Hoboken v.

Roeder v. Alcoa Steamship Co.

341 F. Supp. 1236 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1972

Roeder v. … Roeder v. Alcoa Steamship Co., Inc., 422 F.2d 971 (3rd Cir. 1970). .

BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WALKER WALTON

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2024

Co. v. … Post v. St. Paul Travelers Ins. Co., 691 F.3d 500, 524 (3d Cir. 2012) (quoting Brown v. Progressive Ins. Co., 860 A.2d 493, 501 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2004)).

First Trust & Sav. Bank v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.

12 F.R.D. 195 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1951

Empire Tractor Corp. v. Time, D.C.Pa., 10 F.R.D. 121 ; Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United States, D.C.Pa., 86 F.Supp. 460 ; Gross v. Independence Shares Corp., D.C.Pa., 36 F.Supp. 541 ; Hartman Electric Mfg. Co. v. … King, D.C.Pa., 4 F.R.D. 10 ; Mitchell v. Brown, D.C.Neb., 2 F.R.D. 325 ; Bowles v. Ohse, D.C.Neb., 4 F.R.D. 403 ; United States v. Association of American Railroads, D.C.Neb., 4 F.R.D. 510 .

Lackawaxen Telecom, Inc. v. South Canaan Cellular Investments, LLC

420 B.R. 625 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2009

Carolyn Copp is the Chairman, sole member of the Board of Managers and President of SCCI and the Chairman of the Board of Managers and President of SCCE. Both entities have Ms. … Wawel Savings Bank v. Jersey Tractor Traitor Training, Inc., 580 F.3d 147 (3d Cir.2009); In re Sterten, 546 F.3d 278 , 282 (3d Cir.2008); IRS v. Pransky, 318 F.3d 536, 542 (3d Cir.2003).

United States v. Whyte

694 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1988

Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 , (9th Cir.1988); United States v. Brown, 690 F.Supp. 1423 , (E.D.Pa.1988); United States v. Brodie, 686 F.Supp. 941 (D.D.C.1988). … See Denver v.

GAMBINO v. O'MALLEY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2025

Brown and Clark. … V.

Meier v. Hamilton Standard Electronic Systems, Inc.

748 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 1990

Ass’n v. … Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 22 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2852 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983).

Thompson v. Horsham Township

576 F. Supp. 2d 681 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 2008

In Acierno v. … Because the permit decision was appealable to the Board of Adjustment, and only the Board had final authority to interpret the regulation, there could be no final judgment before the Board issued its decision.

Stineman Coal & Coke Co. v. United States

290 F. 1021 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1923

The common -shipping or maritime term expressing the petitioner’s idea would be “at ship’s side,” and that expressing the respondent’s idea would be “on board.” … The unloading of the barge and the loading of the coal on board the ship was done by stevedores employed by the government officers and at its expense.

The Lofts at Narrow, LLC v. BOROUGH OF WEST READING

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 2021

“Decisions of the Housing Review board may be further appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County, Pennsylvania.” Id. … See Brown v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan of Mid-Atl. States, Inc., No. 1:19-CV-1190, 2019 WL 7281928, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 27, 2019).

Gauthney v. Shalala

890 F. Supp. 401 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 1995

Brown v. Bowen, 845 F.2d 1211, 1213 (3d Cir.1988). Substantial evidence has been defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Richardson v. … Allen v. Bowen, 881 F.2d 37, 39-40 (3d Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, supra at 1214.