Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

0.44s

  • Omnipoint Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove Township

    20 F. Supp. 2d 875 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1998

    Jun.12, 1998); Gearon & Co., Inc. v. Fulton County, Georgia, 5 F.Supp.2d 1351, 1354 (N.D.Ga.1998); Western PCS II v. Extraterritorial Zoning Auth., 957 F.Supp. 1230, 1236 (D.N.M.1997); cf. Paging, Inc. v. … In GTE Mobilnet of Ohio v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Chase Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    269 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1967

    See Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512, 515 , 72 S.Ct. 410 , 96 L.Ed. 534 (1952); M. G. Davis & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 252 F.Supp. 402, 403 (S.D.N.Y.1966); cf. Harrison-Halsted Com. Group v. … Prior to 1966, this court has emphasized the broad discretion granted to the Board in Bridgeport Fed. S. & L. Assn. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Brown v. Clerk of Quarter Sessions Court

    248 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1965

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nissen Foods (USA) Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    540 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1982

    National Labor Relations Board, 455 F.Supp. 1383 (W.D.Pa.1978), and that all of the exemptions are subject to a narrow construction. Kuehnert v. FBI, 620 F.2d 662, 665 (8th Cir. 1980); Hinton v. … NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. at 239-41 , 98 S.Ct. at 2325-26 . See also, Local 30, United States Tile and Composition Workers v. National Labor Relations Board, 408 F.Supp. 520, 527 (E.D.Pa.1973).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Griffin

    324 F. Supp. 545 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1971

    The Brown case involved a Jehovah’s Witness who was convicted under 50 U.S.C. App. § 462 for refusing induction. … They have held that as long as all the members of the board live within the county where the board sits, the board will be deemed a de facto board even if some members live outside the board’s district. United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Baylson v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

    764 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1991

    to the Board a recommended disposition of the matter. … The Disciplinary Board is correct in its assertion that when an amendment to an existing local rule has not been perfected, the original rule remains in force. United States v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 2024

    As others were still boarding, a flight attendant told Plaintiff Brown that she needed to place her purse on the floor. (Id. ¶ 12.) … Brown, 2024 WL 1143478, at * 7 (quoting Hoy v. Angelone, 720 A.2d 745, 754 (Pa. 1998)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Spiewak v. Selective Service Board No. 127

    327 F. Supp. 422 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1971

    Oestereich v. Selective Service Board, 393 U.S. 233, 238 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968). . See Morgan v. Melchar, supra, 442 F.2d at 1088 n. 21. … Selective Service Board, supra, does not apply to challenges to the SSS’s resolution of factual questions in the classification of a registrant. See Morgan v. Melchar, supra, at 1086, 1087, 1089 ; Bucher v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2024

    Pa. 2013) (quoting Brown v. Beard, 492 F.Supp. 2d 474, 476 (E.D. Pa. 2007). … See, e.g., Brown v. Wexford Health, No. 19-1809 (3d Cir.); Brown v. Wolf, 705 F. App’x 63, 64 (3d Cir. 2017) (concluding that “Brown has at least ‘three strikes’ under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)”); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • National Maritime Union of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    375 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 6, 1974

    Fay v. Douds The Union further contends that this Court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s order under the doctrine of Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1949). We do not agree. Fay v. … v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fox Fuel v. Delaware County Schools Joint Purchasing Board

    856 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 1994

    Unger, 928 F.2d at 1396 (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Robb, 733 F.2d at 292 ). … In addition, § 1983 claims against the DCIU, DCSJPB, and school board defendants can succeed only if those defendants acted pursuant to a institutional policy practice or custom. See Monell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Greene v. Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners

    751 F. Supp. 536 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1990

    City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109 , 103 S.Ct. 1660, 1669 , 75 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983). Davis v. Thornburgh, 903 F.2d 212, 222 (3rd Cir.1990). … Davis v. Thornburgh, 903 F.2d at 222 n. 18 (citing Murray v. Silberstein, 882 F.2d 61, 67 (3rd Cir.1989)). . Applications were due on or before March 12, 1990. .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    12 F.2d 89 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 8, 1926

    Upon petition of the defendant, the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, the cause was removed to this court. … Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 267 F. 283 . If, therefore, under Osborn v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Joint Board Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. United States

    106 F. Supp. 534 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1952

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whilden v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    271 F. 507 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1921

    The Sapinero is a large steamship owned by the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation. … Kelley, the master of a Shiping Board tug which was following the Sapinero on her starboard quarter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Drew v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    275 F. 620 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 8, 1921

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bucks County Board of Commissioners v. Interstate Energy Co.

    403 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1975

    Plaintiffs are the Bucks County Board of Commissioners, the Bucks County Planning Commission and Stop the Oil Pipeline Society (STOPS), an unincorporated association. … Bucks County Board of Commissioners v. Commonwealth Public Utility Comm., 11 Comm.Ct. 487 (1973). Petition for Reargument denied January 8, 1974.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 2024

    See Commonwealth v. Brown, CP-51-CR-0002569-2012 (C.P. Phila.). … (Id. at 9-10; Commonwealth v. Brown, CP-51-CR-0002569-2012 (C.P. Phila.).)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Musicians' Protective Union Local No. 274 v. American Federation of Musicians of the United States & Canada

    329 F. Supp. 1226 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

    -C.I.O. v. … Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). 8 . Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 249 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955). 9 . Accord, Hicks v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • The Shubert v. The Einar

    45 F. 497 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1891

    Brown’s first signal. … She had a pilot on board, who was.in control of her movements and also those of the tug.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.