Case law

Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance Corporation

326 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1971

Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 409 Pa. 357 , 186 A.2d 399 (1962); Sunseri v. Sunseri, 358 Pa. 1 , 55 A.2d 370 (1947); Northwestern Nat’l Bank v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 192 , 27 A.2d 20 (1942). … \Supp. 1308 (D.D.C.1970); Termplan Inc. v. Superior Court, 105 Ariz. 270 , 463 P.2d 68 (1969); Andrew Brown Co. v. Painters Warehouse, Inc., 11 Ariz.App. 571 , 466 P.2d 790 (1970); Johnston v.

Jefferys v. LRP Publications, Inc.

184 F.R.D. 262 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1999

See Carotenuto v. Emerson Elec. Co., Civ.A. No. 89-6298, 1991 WL 111258 (E.D.Pa. June 19, 1991); Massey v. Manitowoc Co., 101 F.R.D. 304 (E.D.Pa.1983). … As the Supreme Court noted in Schlagenhauf v.

Mickey v. Barclay

328 F. Supp. 1108 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1971

Resor, supra.] and to delegate its power to the executive branch of government [Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 938 , 89 S.Ct. 1219 , 22 L.Ed.2d 471 (1969)], is not open to question. … Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2d Cir. 1968). (See pp. 1113-1114, infra). 5 . An inspecting general visited Mickey’s unit twice between April and November 1970. 6 . 10 U.S.C. § 938 provides: “§ 938. Art. 138.

DUPREE

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2026

Brown v. City of Philadelphia, 750 F. App’x 171, 173 (3d Cir. 2018) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)). … Brown was performing an administrative function separate from his advocacy role.

Charles Killam & Co. v. Monad Engineering Co.

216 F. 438 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 1914

This case was heard and argued with Monad Engineering Co. v. Charles Killam & Co., 216 Fed. 444 , No. 74 of 1907 in admiralty. … Lake Michigan Co. v. Crosby (D. C.) 107 Fed. 723 ; Worrall v. Davis Co. (D. C.) 113 Fed. 549 , affirmed in 122 Fed. 436, 58 C. C. A. 418 .

Selvanathan v. Opportunities Industrialization Centers International

871 F. Supp. 2d 349 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 10, 2012

Plaintiff sent a letter to Edmund Cooke, the chairman of defendant’s Board of Directors, on September 30, 2008, in which he stated that he wanted to be told “the position of the Board” and “what action the [Board of Directors … V.

Davis v. The Seneca

7 F. Cas. 166 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1828

the case of Ouston v. … Nor can this be attributed to inadvertence, as he has a note on this subject, in which he refers to the case of Willings v. Blight [Case No. 17,765], and to 2 Browne, Civ. Law, 131.

RUELL v. MCDONOUGH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 2024

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KRISTIN BURNS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01810-JDW v. … Brown and asked about the new details for Mss. Burns and Ruell. Mr. Brown was unaware of any details before receiving Ms. Alencherry’s call. However, once Mr. Brown confirmed that new details were in place, Ms.

STARNES v. THREDUP INC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 10, 2023

See Mandel v. … Contra Sassaman v.

BAGLEY v. UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2024

See Whren v. … Porter v. City of Phila., 975 F.3d 374, 383 (3d Cir. 2020); see also Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 293 n.37 (3d Cir. 2009).

Floyd v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

655 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1987

Aronson, who is board certified in the specialties of anatomic pathology, clinical pathology, and forensic pathology. … See Steagall v. Doctors Hospital, 171 F.2d 352 (D.C.Cir.1948); Kohn v. United States, 591 F.Supp. 568 (E.D.N.Y.1984); Hendriksen v. Roosevelt Hospital, 297 F.Supp. 1142 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Black v.

Armstrong v. Kline

513 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1980

Armstrong v. … For example, the Court cited with approval Mills v.

Brangman v. AstraZeneca, LP

952 F. Supp. 2d 710 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 2013

Trade Fabian put Broekie in touch with Danlyn Brown, the Senior Employment Practices Partner. Brown created a coaching e-mail that Broekie sent to Brangman. … See Law v.

GALLOWAY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2021

Hartranft v. Apfel, 181 F.3d 358, 360 (3d Cir. 1999) (quoting Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 564-65 (1988)); Kangas v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 775, 777 (3d Cir. 1987). … Brown’s opinion. Id. at 29-30. Dr.

Rekant v. Shochtay-Gasos Union

194 F. Supp. 187 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 17, 1961

Defendant contends that if plaintiff’s averments are true defendant is guilty of an unfair labor practice and that this court does not have jurisdiction of the case, sole jurisdiction being in the National Labor Relations Board … Defendant cites the opinion of Judge Clary of this court in Strauss v.

Audenreid v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

97 F. Supp. 2d 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 2000

Tziatzios v. U.S., 164 F.R.D. 410, 411, 412 (E.D.Pa.1996) citing Celotex v. Catrett, supra, 477 U.S. at 325 , 106 S.Ct. at 2553-54 , Anderson v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Lindsay v. Dunleavy

177 F. Supp. 2d 398 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2001

In Farmer v. … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 403-04 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . V.

Marion v. City of Philadelphia/Water Department

161 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2001

See Moore v. … Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1389 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Bishop v. National RR Passenger Corp.

66 F. Supp. 2d 650 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1999

Rush at 482 (quoting Berry v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 715 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1983)). … See Van Zant v.

Bowles v. Leithold

60 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1945

The boundary of the court’s discretion was recently commented upon in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co., 1941, 312 U.S. 426 , 61 S.Ct. 693 , 85 L.Ed. 930 . … While there is a conflict in the interpretation of that case, see National Labor Relations Board v. Air Associates, 2 Cir., 1941, 121 F.2d 586 and National Labor Relations Board v.