Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

5,177 results

0.63s

  • Denenberg v. Am. Family Corp. of Columbus, Ga.

    566 F. Supp. 1242 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1983

    Although Pennsylvania law affords absolute immunity for defamatory statements contained in pleadings, if relevant to the proceeding in which they are made, Greenberg v. Aetna Ins. … Co., 427 Pa. 511 , 235 A.2d 576 (1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 907 , 88 S.Ct. 2063 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1366 (1968), statements about them made outside the judicial proceedings are subject to a qualified privilege only; the burden

    Superseded on other grounds by McGee v. Feege, 517 Pa. 247 (1987)Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Hedges Enterprises, Inc. v. Continental Group, Inc.

    81 F.R.D. 461 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1979

    Hedges’ allegations that the proposed class numbers in the thousands clearly satisfies this requirement, Cohen v. … Proof of a conspiracy to establish a “base” price would establish at least the fact of damage, even if the extent of the actual damages suffered by the plaintiffs would vary. See, e. g., Bogosian v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

    323 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1970

    Because counsel appointed in the Order to represent the class was not qualified to represent nor a proper representative of the temporary class established by the Order; and 6. … Clearly, different principles govern at this stage of the proceedings.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Hamiton v. Gugger

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2020

    As we find he qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis, Congress requires we screen his complaint before incurring further costs including serving defendants. After reviewing Mr. … claim is legally or factually frivolous.20 A claim is legally frivolous “where ‘[none] of the legal points [are] arguable on their merits.”21 A claim is factually frivolous “where the claim’s ‘factual contentions are clearly

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • PEPITONE v. TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MERION

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 2020

    Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 694 (1978), and municipalities have no immunity of their own, Owen v. City of Indep., Mo., 445 U.S. 622, 638 (1980). See also Connick v. … State executive officials receive qualified immunity for conduct that “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. Pennsylvania Co.

    367 F. Supp. 1158 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1973

    Parts Corp., 392 U.S. 134 , 88 S.Ct. 1981 , 20 L.Ed.2d 982 (1968), Timken Roller Bearing, supra, Kiefer-Stewart, supra, make it clear that common ownership or control does not provide separately incorporated companies with immunity … Rather, they say, we should permit “qualified representatives” to intervene and “adopt” the class action allegations.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.

    621 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 1985

    Nevertheless, it is clearly the duty of the trial judge to determine the amount of fees and costs to be allowed out of the settlement fund. … Binns, an eminently qualified trial attorney, was called into the fray by plaintiffs’ counsel sometime in 1984. He expended a total of 249.55 hours. His normal billing rate for 1984 was $250 per hour.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. Alberici

    618 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 9, 1985

    And since Ditizio was the witness who placed Alberici in the fraudulent scheme to burn the Jerry Lewis Theatre, an acknowledged failure of Ditizio’s memory would clearly be favorable to Alberici. … While this does not establish that the particular statements made to the government in August 1981 were known to the defense, it does establish that the defense knew that Fardella had, in the past, made statements to the

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • M.M. v. School District of Philadelphia

    142 F. Supp. 3d 396 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2015

    To establish an-ADA claim, plaintiff must show that (1) he is disabled; (2) he is a qualified individual with a disability; 'and (3) he has suffered an adverse action because of that disability. N.P. v. … Here, the issues clearly were intertwined and related and cannot be separated. Lastly, Ms.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Serubo

    460 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1978

    In this case, clearly all the summonses were issued before the IRS recommended prosecution to the Justice Department on November 9, 1977. … Agent Gilbert, who was assisting the Strike Force attorney, qualifies under this definition.

    Vacated on other grounds by United States v. Peter J. Serubo, Donald H. Brown, United States of America v. W. Thomas Plachter, Jr., 604 F.2d 807 (1979)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. M/V LOTILA

    845 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1993

    Asoma retained the services of Jukka Suksi, who testified at the trial and was qualified as an expert in the packaging, handling and ocean transport of steel. … This kind of sampling is in accordance with well-established surveyor practices. Based upon the joint survey, Fowley prepared a meticulous claim for the damaged coils (Plaintiffs Exhibit 7).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Erisa Litigation

    837 F. Supp. 670 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1993

    The Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that “[t]he two provisions cannot both be given full effect, and the contract’s language does not establish which one should be qualified.” Id. at 703 . … The first component of the claim is clearly without merit.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Greenley Energy Holdings of Pennsylvania

    102 B.R. 400 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 1989

    Ciarimboli, as the director of operations for Greenley, providing a rate of $59 per hour. 4 Fifty-nine dollars per hour is obviously lower than what Joseph Ciarimboli could command as a consultant in the marketplace and is clearly … The contract funds thus qualify as being money turned over to the estate upon which trustee’s commissions may be based pursuant to section 326(a).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. GEISINGER HEALTH

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 2022

    antagonism coupled with timing to establish a causal link.” … The Court is persuaded by this line of cases and agrees that the plain language of the statute clearly shows that the 300-day rule applies to the EEOC.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HOSBACH v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 2019

    She stated that her RA and compromised immune system adversely impact her ability to work. R. 494. … Clearly the ALJ considered Plaintiff’s “gap” in treatment a determining factor in assessing credibility and Plaintiff’s RFC.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • King Drug Co. of Florence, Inc. v. Cephalon, Inc.

    88 F. Supp. 3d 402 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2015

    Defendants argue that this statement clearly dictates that a “large and unjustified” analysis must occur prior to application of the rule of reason. … The burden-shifting framework I have adopted does not qualify as a quick-look approach because the plaintiff still maintains the initial burden — establishing anti-competitive effects through market power and evidence of

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • KEEL v. WILLIAMS

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 2019

    Keel also heavily relies on exhibits that are not clearly relevant to each other or to Mr. Keel’s allegations. … Stat. § 5524 (establishing two-year statute of limitations). immunity from claims based on their role in pursuing a prosecution on behalf of the Commonwealth.); Jmbler v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MAZIE v. UNITED STATES

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 2025

    A plaintiff commencing an action in federal court bears the burden of establishing federal jurisdiction. See Lincoln Ben. Life Co. v. … The fact that Mazie’s claims premised on the Supremacy Clause and the Tenth Amendment are so clearly untenable obviates the need to engage in a “rigorous inquiry” of whether a Bivens cause of action could be implied here

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bauer v. Sielaff

    372 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1974

    However, we find that plaintiff did not establish that he had repeatedly or even specifically requested such material. … After plaintiff looked over the misconduct report a couple of times, he said it was true in part, although he repeatedly tried to give a qualifying explanation of parts of it.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Post v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance

    593 F. Supp. 2d 766 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 2009

    Mercy’s written notification of their plan to sue Post for malpractice qualified as a “demand for damages” as the nature of the claim clearly inferred Mercy’s intent to seek damages against Post, even if damages were not … These factors establish that the sanctions petition proceedings became “involved” in Mercy’s malpractice claim as soon as Mercy joined the petition.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.