Case law

Nash v. Signore

515 F. Supp. 511 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1981

Ross v. Meagan, 638 F.2d 646 at 648 (3d Cir. 1981) (per curiam); Waits v. McGowan, 516 F.2d 203, 205 (3d Cir. 1975); Brown v. … Accepting all of the allegations in Nash’s complaint as true, Cruz v.

United States v. Miller

243 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 7, 1965

Adkins v. United States, 298 F.2d 842 (8 Cir. 1962). … We specifically imposed sentence under the provisions of § 4208(a) (2) which permits the Parole Board to determine the appropriate release date of the prisoner. 2 .

Cameron v. Montgomery County Child Welfare Service

471 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 22, 1979

See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 (1975) (school board member entitled to a qualified immunity); Jones v. … Diamond, 519 F.2d 1090 (5th Cir. 1975) (members of County Board of Supervisors entitled to qualified immunity); Nelson v.

Johnson v. The M'Donough

13 F. Cas. 768 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1829

In the case of Spring v. South Carolina Ins. Co., 8 Wheat. [21 U. … This is going very far indeed beyond the decision in the case of Spring v. South Carolina Ins. Co. [supra], and beyond what is necessary for our case. In the case of Levy v.

Kabo v. Summa Corp.

523 F. Supp. 1326 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1981

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 311 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1722 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). A fortiori, we can place little weight on the isolated statements of a single witness. … Brown v. Jones, 404 Pa. 513, 516-17 , 172 A.2d 831, 833-34 (1961).

Transport Workers' Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

678 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1988

Under 43 P.S. § 1101.1301, exclusive jurisdiction to prevent unfair labor practices is given to the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board. See Philadelphia Federation of Teachers v. … Board of Education, 24 Pa.D. & C.3d 211, 214-15 (1981). Federal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over unfair labor practice claims that come within the board’s jurisdictional purview. Sellers v.

Coleman v. Frame

843 F. Supp. 993 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1994

Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 278 (3d Cir.1990); see also Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 322-323 , 102 S.Ct. 2452, 2462 , 73 L.Ed.2d 28 (1982). … Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir.1985); Campbell v. Sacred Heart Hospital, 496 F.Supp. 692 (E.D.Pa.1980).

Romero v. Allstate Insurance

3 F. Supp. 3d 313 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2014

As support for this theory, the EEOC relies heavily on the Seventh Circuit case of EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges & Universities, 957 F.2d 424, 429 (7th Cir.1992). … Nucle-tron, 563 F.Supp.2d at 598 (citing Board of Governors, 957 F.2d at 427-428 ) (emphasis added); see also EEOC v.

Supra Medical Corp. v. McGonigle

955 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1997

The Plaintiff also accepted Defendant Dyson as a member of its Board of Directors. Over the next year, Dr. … Moreover, Defendant Dyson’s service on the Plaintiffs board of directors provides an additional basis for exercising jurisdiction over her, since Plaintiff alleges that her role on Supra’s board placed her in a position to

Gideons International, Inc. v. Gideon 300 Ministries, Inc.

94 F. Supp. 2d 566 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1999

it had been authorized at a meeting of the Board of Directors. … See Jews for Jesus v.

West Laurel Hill Cemetery Co. v. McLaughlin

44 F. Supp. 63 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1942

In the case of May Kimball Smith v. … Little Four Oil Company v. Lewellyn, 3 Cir., 1929, 35 F.2d 149 , and see Willis et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 9 Cir., 1932, 58 F.2d 121 .

General Sugar Estates, Inc. v. The Advance

45 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1942

The Supreme Court in United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co., 276 U.S. 202 , 48 S.Ct. 256 , 72 L.Ed. 531 , and Johnson v. … Schillinger v. United States, 155 U.S. 163, 166 , 15 S.Ct. 85 , 39 L.Ed. 108 . And all the provisions of such a statute are jurisdictional.

DOE A.F. v. LYFT, INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 10, 2024

(Counts V–VI). … Dubose v. Quinlan, 125 A.3d 1231, 1240 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2015) (quoting Smith v. Brown, 423 A.2d 743, 745 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)).

Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Rapistan, Inc.

448 F. Supp. 991 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1978

In return, Holt dropped an action it had instituted against PLCB before the Pennsylvania Board of Arbitration of Claims. … In Silverman v.

Avins v. Hannum

497 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 1980

Justice Washington in Corfield v. … Halsted v. Buster, 119 U.S. 341 , 7 S.Ct. 276 , 30 L.Ed. 462 ; Continental L. Ins. Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U.S. 237 , 7 S.Ct. 193 , 30 L.Ed. 380 ; Howe v. Howe & Owen Ball Bearing Co., 8 Cir., 154 F. 820 , Fidler v.

OCKLEY v. RADNOR TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2025

On August 13, 2022, Plaintiff returned to the Property and found that it was boarded up with plywood and locked by Rockwell-Glynn. (Id. at ¶ 72). … .”); Com. v.

Perry v. Liberty Consumer Discount Co.

433 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1977

Freed Co. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 473 F.2d 1210, 1214 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 827 , 94 S.Ct. 48 , 38 L.Ed.2d 61 (1973). … In Martin v.

Da Costa v. Holland

151 F. Supp. 746 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 2, 1957

Bilokumsky v. Tod, 263 U.S. 149 , 44 S.Ct. 54 , 68 L.Ed. 221 ; Caetano v. Shaughnessy, D.C., 133 F.Supp. 211 ; Quilodran-Brau v. Holland, 3 Cir., 232 F.2d 183, 185 . … The plaintiff contends that the ruling of the Supreme Court in Slochower v. Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S. Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 , overrules the Caetano case and others.

Barnes v. United States

22 F. Supp. 282 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1938

If this question were open I would, in accord with the views ably expressed by Member Lansdon of the Board of Tax Appeals in his dissenting opinion in Crocker v. … However, this question is not open, for it has been squarely ruled in favor of the government by the Circuit Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits, and by the Board of Tax Appeals. Commissioner v.

Pennsylvania Research Corp. v. Lescarboura Spawn Co.

29 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 6, 1939

It is also washed to remove its brown coloring matter and offensive odor, and then dried to remove excess moisture. … In Duplate Corp. v.