Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

4.05s

  • Speziale v. Bethlehem Area School District

    266 F. Supp. 2d 366 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2003

    Desper v. … Only the school board had that authority, and plaintiff never communicated with members of the school board about his employment. See 24 P.S. § 11-1122 (Purdon 1992).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Heron

    525 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2007

    That concern was discussed at the board meeting the next day, see Gov’t ex. 94, but the board apparently decided that further study was necessary. … United States v. Casteneda, 241 Fed.Appx. 411, 413 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 579 (9th Cir.2005)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sassamansville Fire Company No. 1 v. Livelsberger

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2022

    Co. v. … Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 292 (3d Cir. 2009) (citing Doby v. DeCrescenzo, 171 F.3d 858, 868 (3d Cir.1999)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • HORIZON STEVEDORING, INC. v. ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2022

    With respect to the last element, RWC must show Horizon’s and/or Brown’s “acts or omissions were a substantial factor in bringing about its harm.” Bouriez v. … Count V is dismissed with prejudice.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pennsylvania v. Cianfrani

    600 F. Supp. 1364 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1985

    (Stipulation, ¶ 5; Cianfrani v. … Cianfrani v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement Board, supra. 16. The sum of $30,232.80 had been set off from Cianfrani’s retirement payments by November 1, 1979. (Stipulation, ¶ 7). 17.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litigation

    811 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992

    This Document Relates To: Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. K. Louise JONES, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. James LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Margherita BARBETTA v. SEPTA, et al. … Mary Retta JOHNSON v. SEPTA, et al. John INGRAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. William BUTLER, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Matthew CUNNINGHAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frankel v. United States

    321 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1970

    In Vincent v. … Plaintiff relies on Yost v.

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • United States v. Colon

    654 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2009

    United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 251 (3d Cir.2006). Furthermore, reasonable suspicion may fairly be premised on officers training and experience. United States v. Robertson, 305 F.3d 164, 167-68 (3d Cir.2002). … The Court has found, considering the four Brown factors, that the Officers had a reasonable suspicion justifying a seizure.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital

    160 F.R.D. 55 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1995

    Tri-R Sys. v. Friedman & Son, 94 F.R.D. 726, 727 (D.Colo.1982). … United States v. Pofahl, 990 F.2d 1456, 1483 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 266 , 126 L.Ed.2d 218 (1993); United States v. Gonzalez, 933 F.2d 417, 426 (7th Cir.1991).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • WILLIAMS v. CITY OF LANCASTER

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2020

    Brown v. United States, No. CV 17-1551, 2019 WL 764429, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2019)(citing Briscoe v. Klaus, 538 F.3d 252, 258-59 (3d Cir. 2008). … v. Thorne, 790 F. App'x 355, 358 (3d Cir. 2019); Brown, 2019 WL 764429, at *8.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Graham v. Soloner

    220 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1963

    Salzhandler v. Caputo et al., 316 F.2d 445 , 449 (C.A. 2, 1963). To demand confinement of such criticism within the meeting-room walls would, or could, rob it of vitality and efficacy. … The decision of the Execu *715 tive Board makes it clear that the suspension was not imposed for any single act of alleged misconduct, but was based, in the language of the Board, upon «* * * the matter overall * * For the

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Keel v. Axelrod

    148 F. Supp. 3d 411 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2015

    Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 306 (2d Cir.2013). … See Kelly-Brown, 717 F.3d 295, 298-303 ; see also MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Page v. McLaughlin

    7 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1933

    It is true that in Little Four Oil & Gas Company v. Lewellyn (C. C. … Ed. 949 , while it modifies the earlier decision of Crocker v. Malley, 249 U. S. 223 , 39 S. Ct. 270 , 63 L. Ed. 573 , 2 A. L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • MILLER v. BROWNING

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2023

    See Gannaway v. Stroumbakis, 842 F. … Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hosp., Inc., 184 F.3d 268, 277 (3d Cir. 1999); see also Webb v. Chapman, 852 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Frankford Hospital v. Davis

    647 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1986

    The plaintiffs contend that pursuant to Bowen v. … Reimbursement Review Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) which shall be established by the Secretary in accordance with subsection (h) of this section and (except as provided in subsection (g)(2) of this section

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Haynes v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    325 F. Supp. 1308 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1971

    Brown Equipment Rental Corp. v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 836 (1959). … In Elston v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • HUANG v. SAKURA MANDARIN, INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2022

    NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir. 1982). In such enterprises, the entities do not operate “at arm’s length.” Pearson, 247 F.3d at 491. … Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d at 1121; accord NLRB vy. Deena Artware, Inc., 364 U.S, 398, 402 (1960). One member’s actions are “attributable” to the others. kngelhardt v. S.P.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Davis v. Forex

    655 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1986

    Thomas Davis served as an assistant driller on board the Sedneth. Plaintiff was aboard the Sedneth when it was moved in 1983 and 1984. … Griffith, 521 F.2d at 38 , discussing Mack v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 317 F.2d 761 (3d Cir.1963). Subsequently, in Simko v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reverse Vending Associates v. Tomra Systems US, Inc.

    655 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1987

    Furthermore, Tom-ra U.S. has a different board of directors and different officers than Tomra Norway. Each board keeps complete and distinct minutes of their meetings. … However, both corporations have entirely separate officers and boards of directors which maintain separate and distinct meetings and minutes.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Mackensworth v. Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc.

    203 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1961

    See Rosenberg v. United States, 360 U.S. 367 , 79 S.Ct. 1231 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1959). … See Commonwealth v. Vallone, 347 Pa. 419, 421 , 32 A.2d 889 (1943); Commonwealth v. Bolish, 381 Pa. 500, 522-523 , 113 A.2d 464 (1955) ; United States ex rel. Vajtauer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.