Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.05s
Speziale v. Bethlehem Area School District
266 F. Supp. 2d 366 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2003
Desper v. … Only the school board had that authority, and plaintiff never communicated with members of the school board about his employment. See 24 P.S. § 11-1122 (Purdon 1992).
Cited 10 timesPublished525 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2007
That concern was discussed at the board meeting the next day, see Gov’t ex. 94, but the board apparently decided that further study was necessary. … United States v. Casteneda, 241 Fed.Appx. 411, 413 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 579 (9th Cir.2005)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSassamansville Fire Company No. 1 v. Livelsberger
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2022
Co. v. … Brown v. City of Pittsburgh, 586 F.3d 263, 292 (3d Cir. 2009) (citing Doby v. DeCrescenzo, 171 F.3d 858, 868 (3d Cir.1999)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownHORIZON STEVEDORING, INC. v. ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2022
With respect to the last element, RWC must show Horizon’s and/or Brown’s “acts or omissions were a substantial factor in bringing about its harm.” Bouriez v. … Count V is dismissed with prejudice.
Cited 0 timesUnknown600 F. Supp. 1364 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1985
(Stipulation, ¶ 5; Cianfrani v. … Cianfrani v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement Board, supra. 16. The sum of $30,232.80 had been set off from Cianfrani’s retirement payments by November 1, 1979. (Stipulation, ¶ 7). 17.
Cited 11 timesPublishedIn Re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litigation
811 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1992
This Document Relates To: Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. K. Louise JONES, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. James LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Margherita BARBETTA v. SEPTA, et al. … Mary Retta JOHNSON v. SEPTA, et al. John INGRAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. William BUTLER, et al. v. SEPTA, et al. Matthew CUNNINGHAM, et al. v. SEPTA, et al.
Cited 0 timesPublished321 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1970
In Vincent v. … Plaintiff relies on Yost v.
Cited 52 timesPublished654 F. Supp. 2d 326 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2009
United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 251 (3d Cir.2006). Furthermore, reasonable suspicion may fairly be premised on officers training and experience. United States v. Robertson, 305 F.3d 164, 167-68 (3d Cir.2002). … The Court has found, considering the four Brown factors, that the Officers had a reasonable suspicion justifying a seizure.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCorrigan v. Methodist Hospital
160 F.R.D. 55 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1995
Tri-R Sys. v. Friedman & Son, 94 F.R.D. 726, 727 (D.Colo.1982). … United States v. Pofahl, 990 F.2d 1456, 1483 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 266 , 126 L.Ed.2d 218 (1993); United States v. Gonzalez, 933 F.2d 417, 426 (7th Cir.1991).
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 8, 2020
Brown v. United States, No. CV 17-1551, 2019 WL 764429, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 21, 2019)(citing Briscoe v. Klaus, 538 F.3d 252, 258-59 (3d Cir. 2008). … v. Thorne, 790 F. App'x 355, 358 (3d Cir. 2019); Brown, 2019 WL 764429, at *8.
Cited 0 timesUnknown220 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1963
Salzhandler v. Caputo et al., 316 F.2d 445 , 449 (C.A. 2, 1963). To demand confinement of such criticism within the meeting-room walls would, or could, rob it of vitality and efficacy. … The decision of the Execu *715 tive Board makes it clear that the suspension was not imposed for any single act of alleged misconduct, but was based, in the language of the Board, upon «* * * the matter overall * * For the
Cited 11 timesPublished148 F. Supp. 3d 411 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 2015
Kelly-Brown v. Winfrey, 717 F.3d 295, 306 (2d Cir.2013). … See Kelly-Brown, 717 F.3d 295, 298-303 ; see also MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished7 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1933
It is true that in Little Four Oil & Gas Company v. Lewellyn (C. C. … Ed. 949 , while it modifies the earlier decision of Crocker v. Malley, 249 U. S. 223 , 39 S. Ct. 270 , 63 L. Ed. 573 , 2 A. L.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 2023
See Gannaway v. Stroumbakis, 842 F. … Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hosp., Inc., 184 F.3d 268, 277 (3d Cir. 1999); see also Webb v. Chapman, 852 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown647 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1986
The plaintiffs contend that pursuant to Bowen v. … Reimbursement Review Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) which shall be established by the Secretary in accordance with subsection (h) of this section and (except as provided in subsection (g)(2) of this section
Cited 12 timesPublishedHaynes v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
325 F. Supp. 1308 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1971
Brown Equipment Rental Corp. v. Dickey, 397 Pa. 454 , 155 A.2d 836 (1959). … In Elston v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedHUANG v. SAKURA MANDARIN, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2022
NLRB v. Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1122 (3d Cir. 1982). In such enterprises, the entities do not operate “at arm’s length.” Pearson, 247 F.3d at 491. … Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d at 1121; accord NLRB vy. Deena Artware, Inc., 364 U.S, 398, 402 (1960). One member’s actions are “attributable” to the others. kngelhardt v. S.P.
Cited 0 timesUnknown655 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1986
Thomas Davis served as an assistant driller on board the Sedneth. Plaintiff was aboard the Sedneth when it was moved in 1983 and 1984. … Griffith, 521 F.2d at 38 , discussing Mack v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 317 F.2d 761 (3d Cir.1963). Subsequently, in Simko v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedReverse Vending Associates v. Tomra Systems US, Inc.
655 F. Supp. 1122 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1987
Furthermore, Tom-ra U.S. has a different board of directors and different officers than Tomra Norway. Each board keeps complete and distinct minutes of their meetings. … However, both corporations have entirely separate officers and boards of directors which maintain separate and distinct meetings and minutes.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMackensworth v. Mathiasen's Tanker Industries, Inc.
203 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1961
See Rosenberg v. United States, 360 U.S. 367 , 79 S.Ct. 1231 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1304 (1959). … See Commonwealth v. Vallone, 347 Pa. 419, 421 , 32 A.2d 889 (1943); Commonwealth v. Bolish, 381 Pa. 500, 522-523 , 113 A.2d 464 (1955) ; United States ex rel. Vajtauer v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna