Case law

Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown

510 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1981

BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Doylestown, Bucks County, Pennsylvania and it is hereby Ordained and Enacted by authority of same: 1. … See Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v.

United States ex rel. Dwyer v. Rundle

228 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1964

Drew v. Myers, 327 F.2d 174 (3d Cir. Jan. 23, 1964). See United States ex rel. Brown v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 323 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Berkery v. Rundle, 226 F.Supp. 579 (E.D.Pa. … Dalton v. Myers, 227 F.Supp. 526 (E.D.Pa. March 4, 1964).

Federation of Telephone Workers v. Bell Telephone Co.

406 F. Supp. 1201 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 1975

It disclaimed any violations of the Agreement and denied the authority of an arbitration board to review its UMTP. … While it was willing to present that position to an arbitration board, it said that such a presentation was not a waiver of its objections to the board’s authority and jurisdiction over the UMTP.

Fontroy v. Beard

485 F. Supp. 2d 592 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 2007

Brown, 461 F.3d 353 (3d Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1822 , 167 L.Ed.2d 330 (2007). … In its recent decision, Jones v. Brown, 461 F.3d 353 (3d Cir.2006), the Third Circuit reiterated its holding in Bieregu v.

GLUNK v. THE UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2025

v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986). … Brown may have indicated that US Life would rubber-stamp her recommendation due to her reputation, there is no support for the allegation that US Life made such an assertion. See Farris v. J.C.

Country Maid, Inc. v. Haseotes

312 F. Supp. 1116 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1970

Founds v. Shedaker, 278 F.Supp. 32 (E.D.Pa.1968); Brown v. Woodring, 174 F.Supp. 640 (M.D.Pa.1959). Accordingly, we proceed to a consideration of the factors relevant to the issue at hand. … See Sayon v. American Export Lines, Inc., 246 F.Supp. 771 (E.D.Pa.1965); McFarlin v. Alcoa Steamship Company, 210 F.Supp. 793 (E.D.Pa.1962).

United States v. Iannece

405 F. Supp. 599 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1975

This part of the decision, too, depends on facts, and therefore it is important for the board to know not only that some violation was committed but also to know accurately how many and how serious the violations were. ' … Sperling v. Fitzpatrick, 426 F.2d 1161, 1163-64 (2d Cir. 1970); United States v. Brown, 488 F.2d 94, 95 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Vandemark, 522 F.2d 1019 (9th Cir. 1975); United States v.

Stendardo v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n (In Re Stendardo)

139 B.R. 128 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1992

Rule 8013; Brown v. Pennsylvania State Employees Credit Union, 851 F.2d 81, 84 (3d Cir.1988)). Legal conclusions of a bankruptcy court are subject to a plenary review on appeal. Id. (citing Brown, 851 F.2d at 84 ). … Burgettstown-Smith v. Langeloth, 403 Pa.Super. 84 , 588 A.2d 43, 45 (1991) (quoting Wolf v. Wolf, 356 Pa.Super. 365 , 514 A.2d 901, 905-06 (1986)).

United States v. Gregg

557 F. Supp. 1134 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1983

Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); United States v. Cowart, 595 F.2d 1023, 1028-29, n. 7 (5th Cir.1979). … See also Brown v. Ohio, supra; Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137 , 97 S.Ct. 2207 , 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977), reh. denied, 434 U.S. 880 , 98 S.Ct. 241 , 54 L.Ed.2d 164 (1977).

Faush v. Tuesday Morning, Inc.

995 F. Supp. 2d 350 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 23, 2014

See Brown v. J. Kaz, Inc., 581 F.3d 175, 180 (3d Cir.2009) (citing Atkinson v. LaFayette College, 460 F.3d 447 , 454 n. 6 (3d Cir.2006)). … See Holtzman v.

Bailis v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

38 F. Supp. 721 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 9, 1941

Shoenberger’s Ex’rs, 31 Pa. 295 ; McIntyre v. Velte, 153 Pa. 350 [ 25 A. 739 ].” Again, 101 Pa.Super. on pages 173 and 174: “* * * The correct principle was stated by Chief Justice Gibson in Presbyterian Corporation v. … The conditions specified in the resolution adopted by the defendant’s Board of Directors were at no time complied with. 3. Edward M.-P.

Celona v. Equitable National Bank

98 B.R. 705 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1989

. § 1601 et seq. and Regulation Z of the Federal Reserve Board 12 C.F.R. Sec. 226.1 et seq. (hereinafter “Reg. Z”), as amended. … Similarly, in Curry v.

United States v. Heron

525 F. Supp. 2d 729 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2007

That concern was discussed at the board meeting the next day, see Gov’t ex. 94, but the board apparently decided that further study was necessary. … United States v. Casteneda, 241 Fed.Appx. 411, 413 (9th Cir.2007) (citing Sims v. Brown, 425 F.3d 560, 579 (9th Cir.2005)).

John Deere Ltd. v. Sperry Corp.

100 F.R.D. 712 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1983

The American litigation, Deere & Co. v. … Brown In Support of Sperry Corporation’s Motion to Vacate the Order Issued Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782 at 2.

Hann v. Housing Authority of City of Easton

709 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 27, 1989

Carleson v. Remillard, 406 U.S. 598 , 92 S.Ct. 1932 , 32 L.Ed.2d 352 (1972); Townsend v. Swank, 404 U.S. 282 , 92 S.Ct. 502 , 30 L.Ed.2d 448 (1971); King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1968). … Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528 , 94 S.Ct. 1372 , 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974).

NOTHSTEIN v. USA CYCLING

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 5, 2020

Brown v. United States, Civ. A. No. 17-1551, 2018 WL 741731, at *11 (E.D. Pa. … The plaintiff argues this case is similar to Brown v. United States and Doe v. Kohn Nast & Graf P.C., 866 F. Supp. 190 (E.D. Pa. 1994).

THOMAS v. KRASNER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2021

Higgs v. … Grier v.

In re American Storage & Moving Co.

15 F. Supp. 950 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1936

Brown Bros. v. Billington, 163 Pa. 76 , 29 A. 904 , 43 Am.St.Rep. 780 ; Leitch v. Sanford Motor Truck Co., 279 Pa. 160 , 123 A. 658 ; General Motors A. Corp. v. Hartman, 114 Pa.Super. 544 , 174 A. 795 . … Hoffman, Inc., v. Richman (C.C.A.) 75 F.(2d) 823 ; General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Horton, 85 F.(2d) 452 , decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, August 6, 1936.

Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co., Inc.

390 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1975

Paddison v. Fidelity Bank, 60 F. R.D. 695 (E.D.Pa.1973). … Starks v. Orleans Motors, Inc., 372 F.Supp. 928 (E.D.La.1974) ; Kriger v. European Health Spa, Inc., 363 F.Supp. 334 (E.D.Wis.1973) ; Philbeck v.

United States v. Caserta

104 F. Supp. 661 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 14, 1952

“(b) The members and clerical and stenographic employees of the local board, medical advisory board, or board of appeal, the examining physician or examining dentist, and the government appeal agent, dealing with the registrant … Defendant also cites Graham v.