Case law

Greenfield v. Heublein, Inc.

575 F. Supp. 1325 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1983

Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144 , 90 S.Ct. 1598 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970). … TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438 , 96 S.Ct. 2126 , 48 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976); Staffin v. Greenberg, 672 F.2d 1196 (3d Cir.1982).

William Penn Management Corp. v. Provident Fund for Income, Inc.

68 F.R.D. 456 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1975

On April 10, 1974, the directors recommended to Fund’s Board that Channing be selected as the successor investment advisor. This recommendation was accepted by the Board on April 10, 1974. … In Maynard, Merel & Co., Inc. v.

Booth v. King

346 F. Supp. 2d 751 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2004

See Bounds v. … In Wolff v.

Bank and Trust Co. of Old York Road v. Hankin

552 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1982

See Cohen v. … Plaintiff maintains that a demand on the Board of Directors would have been futile, as the present board members are defendants.

Dintino v. Dorsey

91 F.R.D. 280 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1981

Hodgson v. School Board, New Kensington-Arnold School District, 56 F.R.D. 393, 394 (W.D.Pa. 1972). II. … Finberg v.

Philadelphia Council of NeighBorhood Organizations v. Adams

451 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1978

Long v. Robinson, 432 F.2d 977 , 979 (4th Cir. 1970); Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 429 F.Supp. 222, 224 (E.D.Pa.1977). A request for a stay is addressed to the discretion of the court. … See Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 429 F.Supp. 222 , 224 n. 1 (E.D.Pa. 1977).

District Council v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.

377 F. Supp. 1278 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1973

Compare Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 ; United States v. Hamburgh-American S.S. Line, D.C., 216 F. 971 . … Compare Keogh v. Chicago & N.W. Ry. Co., supra, 260 U.S. 156 , 43 S.Ct. 47 , 67 L. Ed. 183, at p. 162 . The matter, therefore, is within the exclusive preliminary jurisdiction of the Shipping Board.

Lott v. Arroyo

785 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1991

The final review board, four-member panel of the Central Office Review Committee, examined the record. They found that Mr. … Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 242 , 96 S.Ct. 2543, 2547 , 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976); Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 , 103 S.Ct. 864 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983).

O'GRADY v. British Airways

134 F. Supp. 2d 407 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2001

In Lahey v. Singapore Airlines, Ltd., a female passenger on board an international Singapore Airlines flight sustained physical injury due to an assault by a male passenger. … To constitute an accident, the occurrence on board the aircraft must be unusual or unexpected, an unusual or unexpected happening. 580 F.2d at 1196 (citing DeMarines v.

The Oritani

40 F.2d 522 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1929

The'other officers of the Oritani were unable to state whether or not this chart was on board when she left New York in April, 1925. I will assume (although not find as a fact) that Chart 708 was not on board. … Hanson v. Haywood Brothers et al. (C. C. A.) 152 F. 401, 402 . See also The Humarock (D. C.) 234 F. 716, 728 .

Kirsch v. Bangladesh Shipping Corp.

544 F. Supp. 83 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1982

See Rother v. Interstate and Ocean Transport Co., 540 F.Supp. 477 at 484-485 (E.D.Pa.1982); Klitznsky v. Pakistan Shipping Corp., 530 F.Supp. 326 (E.D.Pa.1981); Collier v. … In Simmons v.

In Re Diet Drugs

236 F. Supp. 2d 445 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 2002

This Document Relates to: Sheila Brown, et al. v. American Home Products Corporation. No. MDL 1203. Civil Action No. 99-20593. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. … It is to be completed and signed by a board-certified cardiologist or cardiothoracic surgeon.

Onyebuchim Onyeanusi v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

767 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1990

In Tarar v. … pass, was not imminently preparing to board, and not at the time under direction of the airline’s personnel); Hill v.

Jansen v. The Theodor Heirich

13 F. Cas. 352 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1838

The libel-lants went on board the ship at Biga; their monthly, wages were fixed; they sailed for Londonderry without objection or complaint. Must we not say that they agreed to that voyage? I cannot doubt it. … As to the first, I have explained my views of the law in Ma-gee v. The Moss [Case No. 8,944]. I think the principles I adopted in that case are applicable to this, and that there is no ground for forfeiture.

Csanadi v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUF., WHSEMEN. & HELPERS LOC. U.

463 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1978

Goclowski v. Penn Central Transp. Co., 571 F.2d 747, 757 (3d Cir. 1977); Pawlak v. … the Executive Board of the Joint Council.

F. Wallis Armstrong Co. v. McCaughn

21 F.2d 636 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 12, 1927

De Laski, etc., Co. v. Iredell (D. C.) 268 F. 377 . … Basham Co. v. Lucas, decided July 25th, 21 F.(2d) 550 , by the District Court for the'Western District of Kentucky.

United States v. Donato

269 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1967

See United States v. Lefkowitz, 284 F.2d 310, 313 (2nd Cir. 1960); United States v. Allegrucci, 258 F.2d 70 (3rd Cir. 1958). … Although in Schell v.

Texaco Trinidad, Inc. v. Afran Transport Co.

538 F. Supp. 1038 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 11, 1982

Authority for that is the Homer case as well as People of State of California v. Italian Motorship Ilice, 534 F.2d 836 (9th Cir. 1976) and Hogge v. SS YORKMAR, 434 F.Supp. 715 (D.Md.1977). … Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, supra, 182 U.S. at 412 , 21 S.Ct. at 834 , quoting Lucey v. Ingram, 6 M & W.

Casey v. O'BANNON

536 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1982

Glenn v. Newman, 614 F.2d 467, 472 (5th Cir. 1980). See, Goss v. … Continental Group, Inc. v. Amoco Chemical Corp., 614 F.2d 351 , 356-57 (3d Cir. 1980); Accord, Kennecott v. Smith Corp., 637 F.2d 181 (3d Cir. 1980); Fitzgerald v.

Parliament Import Co. v. Gibson Wine Co., Inc.

537 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1982

Gibson relies on Honda Associates Inc. v. … Zerance v. William Harvey Research Corp., 401 F.Supp. 804 (E.D.Pa. 1975); see, Plum Tree, Inc. v. Stockment, 488 F.2d 754 (3d Cir. 1973).