Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.54s

  • United States Ex Rel. Cannon v. Johnson

    396 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1975

    Glass from the dockets and records of: (1) the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole; (2) the Pennsylvania Bureau of Corrections; (3) the Administrative Judge of the Trial Division of the Philadelphia Court of Common … The Commonwealth, in its brief, cites no less than twenty-six Pennsylvania appellate decisions affirming and reaffirming the old rule, from Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

    57 F. Supp. 680 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 1, 1944

    But see Brown v. DeYoung, 1897, 167 Ill. 549 , 47 N.E. 863 . Finally, many stockholders’ secondary actions have been heard by the courts wherein the corporation has interposed defenses without objection. Brown v. … See Riley v. Boynton Coal Co., 305 Pa. 364 , 157 A. 794 ; Bonini v. Family Theatre Corp., 327 Pa. 273 , 194 A. 498 ; Beck v. O’Laughlin, 337 Pa. 416 , 11 A.2d 867 ; Steckler v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Burton v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

    255 F. Supp. 3d 616 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2015

    Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450, 454 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting Wilson v. Quadramed Corp., 225 F.3d 350, 354-55 (3d Cir.2000)) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Indeed, the Third Circuit, in Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bistrian v. Levi

    299 F. Supp. 3d 686 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 2018

    They are: Bergos, Blackman, Brown, Garraway, Gibbs, Knox, McLaughlin, and White. … See Baraka v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Borenstein v. City of Philadelphia

    595 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1984

    E.g., School District of Philadelphia v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, City of Philadelphia, 417 Pa. 277 , 207 A.2d 864 (1965); Ebald v. … Because waivers of immunity are to be narrowly construed, see Vann v. Board of Education of School District of Philadelphia, 76 Pa.Cmwlth. 604 , 464 A.2d 684 (1983); Smith v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Defeo v. Sill

    810 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1993

    Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 466 , 103 S.Ct. 864, 868 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See Best v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh, 393 Pa. 106, 110-11 , 141 A.2d 606 (1958). In Count IV plaintiffs assert a claim for intentional interference with contracts.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • United Office & Professional Workers v. Monumental Life Ins.

    88 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1950

    See Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 3 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 3 , 149 A.L.R. 271 ; Agostini Bros. Building Corp. v. United States, 4 Cir., 1944, 142 F.2d 854 ; Watkins v. … Donahue v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., supra [ 138 F.2d 5 ].

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Juniper Mills, Inc. v. J. W. Landenberger & Co.

    6 F.R.D. 463 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1947

    In Gatch Wire Goods Co. v. W. A. … Co., 3 Cir., 243 F. 575, 576 , Judge Woolley said: “If the patent is manifestly invalid on its face, the court may stop short at the instrument and dismiss the bill (Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • ELLIS v. BERKS COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 7, 2021

    Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); Brown v. Grabowski, 922 F.2d 1097, 1104 (3d Cir. 1991)); Dundore v. O’Donnell, Civ. A. No. 85-2907, 1985 WL 2681 at *2 (E.D. Pa. … The Judicial Conduct Board is an agency of the Commonwealth and is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. Lattaker v. Rendell, 269 F. App’x 230, 232 (3d Cir. 2008) (per curiam).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roofing & Sheet Metal Contractors' Association v. Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local Union No. 19

    396 F. Supp. 137 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 1975

    A decision by the board is binding on both parties. … Wagner Electric Corporation v. Local 1104, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, 496 F.2d 954, 956-57 (8th Cir. 1974); Eazor Express, Inc,, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC.

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 5, 2025

    A Disciplinary Board Committee (“Hearing Committee”) held a hearing on May 1 and 2, 5 The docket for ODC v. … The Disciplinary Board adjudicated the matter on January 23, 2025, and filed its Report and Recommendations (“Disciplinary Board R&R”) with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court March 11, 2025.6 See id., Disciplinary Board R&

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Summers v. Harris

    513 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1981

    Livingston v. Califano, 614 F.2d 342, 345 (3d Cir. 1980); Rossi v. … Baerga v. Richardson, 500 F.2d 309, 312 (3d Cir. 1974), cited with approval in Cotter v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hicks v. Arthur

    843 F. Supp. 949 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1994

    Brown v. St. Luke’s Hospital, 816 F.Supp. 342, 344 (E.D.Pa.1993); Freeman, 795 F.Supp. at 741 . … Plaintiff Lewis alleges only that “the defendant Fishman explained to her that the reason for her dismissal was due to the fact that an unidentified board member felt that she was not sociable.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASS'N, ETC. v. Com.

    508 F. Supp. 567 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1981

    See Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624, 636 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980); Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634 (8th Cir. 1978). … See Colautti v. Franklin, supra, 439 U.S. 379 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • GAGNON v. PBPP/DOC

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2025

    Gagnon asserts that he should have been seen by a Board member before being brought to an SCI, “but Agents are not doing so.” (Id.) … Brown v. Pennsylvania, Wayne Cnty., No. 22-1506, 2023 WL 3376547, at *2 (3d Cir. May 11, 2023), cert. dismissed sub nom. Brown v. Pennsylvania, 144 S. Ct. 272 (2023), reconsideration denied, 144 S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States ex rel. Shelton v. Rundle

    278 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1968

    On March 8, 1966, the Board of Pardons refused commutation. … Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 400 , 83 S.Ct. 822 , 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963). In Smith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Acadia Overseas Freighters, Ltd.

    104 F. Supp. 793 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 24, 1952

    It would constitute an unwarranted extension of the doctrine of Seas Shipping Co. v. … To indulge in the presumption contended for by the libellant would make the owner the insurer of any appliance found on board, the origin of which the injured party was not prepared to show except to state that he had not

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • GARRETT v. AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2024

    Three years later, five union officials—Omar Salaam, Kim Athanasiadis, Damon Kinsey, Shermeka Core, and Leonard Brown—filed charges against him with the AFSCME Judicial Panel alleging his improper use of union funds. … See e.g., Curtis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Page v. Bancroft Neurohealth, Inc.

    575 F. Supp. 2d 664 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2008

    of Trustees (“Board”). … In Pane v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Auto Insurance v. Summy

    83 F. Supp. 2d 530 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 2000

    Harter v. GAF Corp., 967 F.2d 846, 852 (3d Cir.1992); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). III. … In Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. Steely, — A.2d -, 1999 WL 1297456 (1999), a minor, Steven Brown, lived in a rental property owned by the Steelys.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.