Case law

Spencer v. Steinman

179 F.R.D. 484 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1998

United States v. … See Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 committee note, 1991 amendment; Santiago-Lugo, 904 F.Supp. at 48 ; Board of Ed. v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass’n, 38 N.Y.2d 397 , 380 N.Y.S.2d 635 , 343 N.E.2d 278 (1975). .

In Re Mortgage & Realty Trust Securities Litigation

787 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 27, 1991

In Kamen v. … In Grill v.

Sames v. Gable

542 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). A claim of entitlement is decided by reference to state law. Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); Kelly v. … Warminister Township Board of Supervisors, 512 F.Supp. 658, 600, n.2 (E.D.Pa.1981); Skrocki v. Caltabiano, 505 F.Supp. 916, 918 (E.D.Pa.1981).

DOE v. THE HILL SCHOOL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2023

Doe’s sole case citation to support the notion that Defendants’ conduct was extreme or outrageous is Doe v. Brown Univ., 43 F.4th 195, 210 (1st Cir. 2022), which quoted Russell v. Salve Regina Coll., 649 F. … But neither Brown, nor the district court case on which it relied, supports Plaintiff’s IIED claim.

Suber v. Guinta

927 F. Supp. 2d 184 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2013

Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E. for M.E., 172 F.3d 238, 252 (3d Cir.1999); Woods v. Bentsen, 889 F.Supp. 179, 184 (E.D.Pa.1995) (Reed, J.). … Chainey v. Street, 523 F.3d 200, 219 (3d Cir.2008) (quoting Kaucher v. County of Bucks, 455 F.3d 418, 423 (3d Cir.2006)).

Sargent v. United States

780 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1992

See Harris v. United States, 532 F.Supp. 966, 968 (D.D.C.1982). Defendants further contend that my reliance on Neal , which permitted review of a military board decision under the APA, was misplaced. … See Banks v. Garrett, 901 F.2d 1084 (Fed.Cir.1990). That court has held that review of military board decisions is unavailable under the APA. In Mitchell v.

United States v. Venable

453 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1978

United States v. Brown, 547 F.2d 438, 441 (8th Cir. 1977). The jury in the instant case also rendered a general verdict. But two notes from the jury show how it reached its decision. … Those cases cited by defendant, United States v. Brown, 547 F.2d 438 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Nash, 447 F.2d 1382 (4th Cir. 1971); and United States v.

Conestoga Wood Specialities Corp. v. Sebelius

917 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 2013

Further, on October 31, 2012, the board of directors adopted “The Hahn Family Statement on the Sanctity of Human Life.” 5 (Pls.’ Br., Ex. 5.) … Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 606 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). .

Guddeck v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

957 F. Supp. 2d 622 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 2013

Johnson v. … GSK also cites Brown v. Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., 284 F.3d 871 *625 (8th Cir.2002), a diversity action involving a second removal notice.

Koger v. Guarino

412 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1976

Board of Regents v. Roth, supra [ 408 U.S. 564 ], at 570-571 [ 92 S.Ct. 2701, at 2705-2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 ]. … Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 378-379 [ 91 S.Ct. 780 , 28 L.Ed.2d 113 ] (1971); Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, at 570, n. 8 [ 92 S.Ct. 2701 ].

Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

624 F. Supp. 858 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1985

The Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933 created the Federal Home Loan Bank *861 Board (the “Board”), 12 U.S.C. § 1464 , and authorized the Board “to provide for the organization, incorporation, examination, operation and regulation … Defendant has been chartered by the Board. National banks may be subject to a federal court’s diversity jurisdiction 6 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1348 . See Trent Realty Associates v.

United States v. Vassallo

282 F. Supp. 928 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1968

In United States v. … See generally, Washington v. Clemmer, 339 F.2d 715, 717-719 (C.A., D.C., 1964), and Ross v. Sirica, 380 F.2d 557 (C.A., D.C.1967).

Bridges v. Colvin

136 F. Supp. 3d 620 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2015

See Andrews v. … New v, Brown, No. 97-CV-125, 1997 WL 666173 , at *6 (E.D.Pa. Oct. 21, 1997). .

Keck v. Employees Independent Association

387 F. Supp. 241 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1974

Supp. at 55 , Judge Levet rejected as unreasonable the Executive Board’s interpretation and held that the refusal of the Executive Board to permit the membership to vote on the proposals would appear to violate plaintiffs … The resolution was adopted by a majority vote, but the International Board held that the resolution violated the by-laws of the International and invalidated the vote. Plaintiffs in Gurton v.

Borkowski v. Fraternal Order of Police, Philadelphia Lodge No. 5

155 F.R.D. 105 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 16, 1994

FW/PBS, Inc. v. … The Pennsylvania Supreme Court specifically held that the president of a corporation could not sue in his capacity as president when there is a deadlock in the board of directors. See Seifert v.

United States v. Campbell

179 F. 762 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1910

C.) 68 Fed. 886 , decided in 1895 by Judge Brown in the Southern district of New York. … Benson v. Henkel, 198 U. S. 1 , 25 Sup. Ct. 569, 49 L. Ed. 919 ; Price v. McCarty, 89 Fed. 84 , 32 C. C. A. 162 ; United States v. Wimsatt (D. C.) 161 Fed. 586 .

Doe v. Methacton School District

914 F. Supp. 101 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1996

Feeser, Inc. v. Serv-A-Portion, Inc., 909 F.2d 1524, 1531 (3d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 921 , 111 S.Ct. 1313 , 113 L.Ed.2d 246 (1991) (citing Celotex Corp. v. … Similarly, in D.T., the Tenth Circuit held that there was no causation when a school board hired a teacher who, during summer vacation, molested several students. 984 F.2d at 1188. Likewise, in K.L. v.

United States v. Hartwell

296 F. Supp. 2d 596 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 2003

(citing U.S. v. Skipwith, 482 F.2d 1272 ,-1281 (5th Cir.1973)). See also U.S. v. DeAngelo, 584 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir.1978); U.S. v. Meulener, 351 F.Supp. 1284 (C.D.Cal.1972); People v. … See also U.S. v.

Mraz v. County of Lehigh

862 F. Supp. 1344 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1994

Defendant Bausch told Plaintiff that he was discharged because he leaked information to the Board of Commissioners. … Id.; Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Taylor v. MacLaughlin

30 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1939

The Board held that the transaction was,. in effect, a surrender of the stock rather than a sale and, further, that the proportion in which the petitioner owned' the preferred and common stock was not material. Weiss v. … In the latter case the Board said, “The remaining stock absorbed the value inherent in the. surrendered certificates and there was no more loss than there is a gain in a stock dividend. Eisner v.