Case law

Laubach v. Fidelity Consumer Discount Co.

686 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1988

Ass’n v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, 595 F.Supp. 800 (E.D.Pa.1984). … See e.g., Bizier v. Globe Financial Services, Inc., 654 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981); N.C. Freed Co., Inc. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 473 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir.1973).

Continental Casualty Co. v. County of Chester

244 F. Supp. 2d 403 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2003

Bowers by Brown v. Estate of Feathers, 448 Pa.Super. 263 , 671 A.2d 695, 696 (1995) (quoting State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co., 441 Pa.Super. 446 , 657 A.2d 1252, 1255 (1995)). … Bellis v. Board of Pensions and Ret., 160 Pa.Cmwlth. 314 , 634 A.2d 821, 825 (1993) (quoting Com. v. McSorley, 189 Pa.Super. 223 , 150 A.2d 570, 572 (1959)); compare Black’s Law Dictionary 968 (7th ed.1999).

Warren v. Veterans Hospital

382 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 1974

Hackley v. Johnson, 360 F.Supp. 1247 (D.C.D.C.1973); Johnson v. United States Postal Service, 364 F.Supp. 37 (N.D.Fla.1973); Handy v. Gayler, 364 F.Supp. 676 (D.Md.1973); Tomlin v. … See also Johnson v.

United States ex rel. Keen v. Mazurkiewicz

306 F. Supp. 483 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1969

Ford v. Board of Mgrs. of the New Jersey State Prison, *485 407 F.2d 937 (3rd Cir. 1969); Gurczynski v. Yeager, 339 F.2d 884 (3rd Cir. 1964); United States ex rel. Duronio v. Russell, 256 F.Supp. 479 (M.D.Pa.1966). … Ford v. Board of Mgrs. of the New Jersey State Prison, supra, and cases cited therein. ORDER And now, to wit, this 21st day of November, A.

Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

61 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1945

In Casey v. … R. board authorized the guarantee of a bond issue, the terms and conditions of which were to be settled by the P. O. & D. board, and the P.

Ladele v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

95 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 3, 1982

Harrison v. Simon, 91 F.R.D. at 429 . *201 In moving for class certification, plaintiff relies upon an “across-the-board” theory. Originally articulated by the Fifth Circuit in Johnson v. … Pa. 1978) (allegations of across-the-board discrimination in hiring, promotion, and salary when coupled with showing of centralized control over such decisions satisfies commonality); Black Grievance Comm. v.

Tatko Bros. Slate Co. v. Capitol Slate Co.

221 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1963

The platforms and tractor-trailers used boards in holes rather than slate for end supports, but whether boards -or slate are used for this purpose, the same principle applies. … Slate Co. v. Hannon, 270 F.2d 571 (2d Cir., 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 915 , 80 S.Ct. 260 , 4 L.Ed.2d 185 (1959); Vermont Structural Slate Co. v. Tatko Bros.

ESTATE OF PEREZ v. City of Philadelphia

701 F. Supp. 2d 658 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2010

Brown v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Health Emergency Medical Servs. Training. Inst., 318 F.3d 473 , 478 (3d Cir.2003). … Sanford v. Stiles, 456 F.3d 298, 304-305 (3d Cir.2006). Defendant’s motion to dismiss relies on Brown, 318 F.3d 473 . In that case, one-year old Shacquiel Douglas choked on a grape. Id. at 475.

Jean Anderson Hierarchy of Agents v. Allstate Life Insurance

2 F. Supp. 2d 688 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1998

Specifically, Surety and Lincoln Benefit are alleged to be sister corporations (sharing the same officers and Board of Directors) and wholly owned subsidiaries of Allstate while Allstate is alleged to have been a subsidiary … Little Brown and Co., 304 Pa.Super. 424, 432 , 450 A.2d 984, 988 (1981).

Estenich v. Heenan

878 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1995

See e.g., Wickman Contracting Co. v. Board of Educ., 715 F.2d 21 , 26 (2d Cir.1983); National Labor Relations Board v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc., 930 F.2d 316, 319 (3d Cir.1991). … Wenner Ford Tractor Rentals, Inc., 315 NLRB No. 144 (citing National Labor Relations Board v. Wright Line, 662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir.1981)).

Callen v. OULU O/Y

711 F. Supp. 244 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1989

“The shipowner is not relieved of liability as a matter of law simply because it relied on the stevedore to correct the condition, Lieggi [v. Maritime Co.], 667 F.2d [324] at 328 [(2nd Cir.1981)]; Evans [v. … Lieggi, 667 F.2d at 328; see Evans, 639 F.2d at 856-57; Napoli v. Hellenic Lines Ltd., 536 F.2d 505, 509 (2d Cir.1976).” Moore v. M.P. Howlett, Inc., 704 F.2d 39, 42 (2d Cir.1983).

Gainey v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAM. CLERKS, ETC.

177 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 1959

Cases to the effect that "the jurisdiction of the Board to adjust grievances and disputes of the type covered by the Act is exclusive" are collected in Gunther v. … The defendant Brotherhood therefore quite properly incorporated in its motion the Constitution of the Grand Lodge and the By-Laws of the Pennsylvania Railroad System Board of Adjustment of the Brotherhood. Fagan v.

Starkey v. Township of Chester

628 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1986

Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55, 67 , 99 S.Ct. 2642, 2650 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Northeast Bancorp., Inc. v. … Wackenhut Corp. v.

William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey

430 F. Supp. 2d 458 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 2006

Unix, 1993 WL 414724 , *13; see also Academy of Motion Picture Arts v. Creative House Promotions, 944 F.2d 1446 , 1452 (9th Cir.1991); Brown, 714 F.2d at 1092 . … Mister Maestro, Inc., 224 F.Supp. 101 (S.D.N.Y.1963), with Brown, 714 F.2d 1088 , White, 193 F.2d 744 , and Continental Cas. Co. v. Beardsley, 253 F.2d 702 (2d Cir.1958).

Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air v. Pennsylvania

533 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1982

See Brown v. EPA (Brown II), 566 F.2d 665 , 668-672 (9th Cir. 1977); Maryland v. EPA, 530 F.2d 215, 227-228 (4th Cir. 1975), vacatedm. U.S. 99, 97 S.Ct. 1635 , 52 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977); District of Columbia v. … See Brown II, supra, at 672-673; Maryland v. EPA, supra, at 224-226; District of Columbia v. Train, supra, at 990-995; Brown I, supra, at 837-842.

United States v. Martin

155 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2001

See United States v. Rickus, 737 F.2d 360, 364 (3d Cir.1984) (citing Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Brown v. … Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 19 n. 16, 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Brown v. City of Oneonta, 195 F.3d 111, 121 (2d Cir.1999).

The Anna

223 F. 558 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 7, 1915

We have, therefore, two facts: These goods were received on board in good condition. They were unloaded in a damaged condition, due to sea water. … The concession is forced by the rulings in Pearse v. Steamship Co. (D. C.) 24 Fed. 287 , and Lace Mills v. Navigation Co. (D. C.) 145 Fed. 701 .

Point Pleasant Canoe Rental, Inc. v. Tinicum Township

110 F.R.D. 166 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 2, 1986

McBrien, Jr., filed suit against Tinicum Township, the township board of supervisors, township zoning officer, and certain citizens. … See, e.g., Planned Parenthood v.

Escher v. DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC.

417 B.R. 245 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2009

Congress has specifically designated the Federal Reserve Board and its staff as the "primary source for interpretation and application of truth-in-lending law.” Aronson v. … Thus, the Federal Reserve Board’s interpretation of the TILA is entitled to Chevron deference. See Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v.

Messa v. Allstate Ins. Co.

897 F. Supp. 876 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1995

See Roman v. … See Skolnick v. Martin, 317 F.2d 855, 857 (7th Cir.1963); Kovacs v.