Case law

United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Robinson

495 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1980

E. g., Wolff v. McDonnell, supra; Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979). … In an earlier case, Wood v.

James v. O'BANNON

557 F. Supp. 631 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1982

In Shea v. … VanLare and Lewis v.

Frederick L. v. Thomas

419 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1976

Compare Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia,U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976) with Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71 , 92 S.Ct. 251 , 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971) and Weinberger v. … Mills v. Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F.Supp. 1257 (E.D.Pa.1971), 343 F.Supp. 279 (E.D.Pa.1972). 26 .

Porrata v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n

38 F. Supp. 3d 549 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 2014

V, § 1. 9. … Smith Corp. v. F.T.C., 530 F.2d 515 , 525 (3d Cir.1976) (quoting Gause v. Perkins, 3 Jones Eq. 177 , 69 Am.Dec. 728 (1857)).

Wood v. Sewall's Adm'rs

128 F. 141 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1904

In Wilfred v. Myers (D. C.) 40 Fed. 170 , a similar conclusion concerning a representation about capacity was reached. … In Clydesdale Co. v. Brauer Steamship Co. (D.

Mitchell v. Hendricks

431 F. Supp. 1295 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1977

Montgomery County Prison Board, 369 F.Supp. 873, 874 (E.D.Pa.1974), in a civil rights action the plaintiff must allege an injury from denial of medical care which results in “undue suffering or permanent residual injury.” … See, e. g., Rizzo v. Goode, 506 F.2d 542 (3d Cir. 1974) rev’d on other grounds, 423 U.S. 362 , 96 S.Ct. 598 , 46 L.Ed.2d 561 (1975); Bracey v. Grenoble, 494 F.2d 566 (3rd Cir. 1974); Brown v.

Curry v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

843 F. Supp. 988 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1994

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See, e.g., Board of Education v. Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, 464 Pa. 92 , 346 A.2d 35 (1975); Bolduc v. Board of Supervisors, 152 Pa. Cmwlth. 248, 618 A.2d 1188 (1992).

Johnson v. Resources for Human Development

888 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1995

Brown v. Borough of Chambersburg, 903 F.2d 274, 277 (3d Cir.1990). … Brown, 903 F.2d at 274 ; P. Mastrippolito & Sons v. Joseph, 692 F.2d 1384 (3d Cir.1982); Kutska, 564 F.2d at 108 ; Sek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 421 F.Supp. 983 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff'd, 565 F.2d 153 (3d Cir.1977).

McCrery v. Mark

823 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1993

Kentucky Dept. of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 461 , 109 S.Ct. 1904, 1909 , 104 L.Ed.2d 506 (1989) (citing Board of Pardons v. … Noting this similarity of processes, the Supreme Court stated in Connecticut Board of Pardons v.

Twardzik v. Sepauley

286 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1968

of the persons named in the proxy to vote for the election of a board of directors which included plaintiff. … To the same effect, see Wahyou v.

Roberts v. Inservco Ins. Servs., Inc.

334 F. Supp. 3d 646 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2018

Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 557, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). ALA, Inc. v. CCAIR, Inc. , 29 F.3d 855 , 859 (3d Cir. 1994) ; Fay v. Muhlenberg Coll. , No. 07-4516, 2008 WL 205227 , at *2 (E.D. Pa. … Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP , 615 F.3d 159 , 165 (3d Cir. 2010). Id. at 166 (quotation marks omitted) (citing Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus.

United States ex rel. Crawley v. Rundle

320 F. Supp. 1399 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 6, 1970

Demers v. Brown, 343 F.2d 427 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 818 , 86 S.Ct. 40 , 15 L.Ed.2d 64 (1965); see Friedman v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co., 320 F.2d 244 (3d Cir., 1963). … Curry v. Wainwright, 416 F.2d 379 (5th Cir. 1969). Here, where Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) is applicable, there can be no notice of appeal filed beyond the time limits stated in that rule. Lindsey v.

United States v. Good

131 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 1955

prior to an adverse decision by the appeal board. … This question has been decided in the negative by the Supreme Court of the United States in the recent case ,of Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 , 75 S.Ct. 409 .

City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp.

126 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2000

Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Med., 760 A.2d 863, 869 (2000) (emphasis supplied; internal quotes omitted). … See Liney, 218 A.2d at 337 ; Brown v. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Med., 760 A.2d 863, 868-69 (2000); see also Assoc. Gen. Contractors v.

Basic Fun, Inc. v. X-CONCEPTS, LLC

157 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2001

See Adams v. Freedom Forge Corp., 204 F.3d 475, 484 (3d. … Dorfman admitted that the BFI product, when the keychain is not attached to the board, is not a keychain.

Knox v. United States Lines Co.

186 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 1, 1960

For example, in the case of Petterson v. Alaska S. S. Co. 2 the longshoremen apparently brought on board the respondent’s ship a wooden block on which to stand while they performed their work. … It was customary in building such walls to use only second-class boards.

Cutner v. Newman

398 F. Supp. 2d 389 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 2005

Defendants are the appropriate officials of the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, sued in their official capacities. Plaintiffs have filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. … Plaintiffs counter with the argument that the recent “advisory” is a nullity, because the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board does not have the legal authority to repeal Pennsylvania statutes which expressly permit in-state

Bartelson v. Dean Witter & Co.

86 F.R.D. 657 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1980

Despite defendant’s contentions, however, we do not believe that Rodriguez signalled an end to across the board employment discrimination cases, though the recent interpretation of Rodriguez in Scott v. … Some courts have interpreted Rodriguez as a repudiation of the across the board approach to employment discrimination cases, see e. g., Hill v. Western Electric Co., Inc., 596 F.2d 99 (4th Cir. 1979), and Hubbard v.

Lindenbaum v. City of Philadelphia

584 F. Supp. 1190 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1984

See e.g., Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977); Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 , 97 S.Ct. 1428 , 51 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); Elrod v. … E.g., Friedman v. Rogers, 440 U.S. 1 , 99 S.Ct. 887 , 59 L.Ed.2d 100 (1979); Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra; Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Goldwire v. City of Philadelphia

130 F. Supp. 3d 936 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2015

Fowler v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).