Case law

Grossmuller v. International Union, UAW

511 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1981

See, e. g., Boyer v. J. A. Majors Co. Employees’ Profit Sharing Plan, 481 F.Supp. 454, 458 (N.D.Ga.1979); Barrett v. Thorofare Markets, Inc., 452 F.Supp. 880, 884 (W.D.Pa.1978). … See Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 260 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1050 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978).

Milson v. Hess

320 F. Supp. 305 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1970

Selective Service System Local Board, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 ; Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 , and Bucher v. … The board was acting pursuant to its regulations and could not reopen the plaintiff’s classification on the facts presented to it. See Clark v. Volatile, 427 F.2d 7 (3d Cir. 1970); United States v.

Rich v. United States

144 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1956

In Brooks v. … Finally, in United States v.

Edwards v. Media Borough Council

430 F. Supp. 2d 445 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 2006

The Zoning Board denied the request for a variance three times, even after the developer modified the plan to include only four townhouses, at the suggestion of the Zoning Board. (Id. ¶¶ 24-25.) … For example, in Joan Doe v.

Bass v. Butler

224 F. Supp. 2d 950 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 2002

Bass v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Howard D. Rosenman, M.D.), No. 842 C.D.1999, slip op. at 4-6 (Pa.Commw.Ct. Feb. 18, 2000) (“Bass v. WCAB II”). … See Board of School Comm’rs v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128, 129 , 95 S.Ct. 848, 850 , 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975).” Booth v. Prince George’s County, 66 F.R.D. 466, 476 (D.Md.1975). 6.

King v. Township of East Lampeter

17 F. Supp. 2d 394 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1998

Board of Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980). … See Bradley v.

Giammetta Associates, Inc. v. J.J. White, Inc.

573 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1983

United States Industries v. Blake Construction Company, 671 F.2d 539 (D.C. 1982) is directly on point. … Three cases involving government contracts decided by the Contract Board of Appeals provide guidance.

Struski v. Penn Central Co.

294 F. Supp. 997 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1969

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768 , 72 S.Ct. 1022 , 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952), Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 323 U.S. 192 , 65 S.Ct. 226 , 89 L.Ed. 173 (1944), Cunningham v. … The Circuit Court, citing Conley v.

Walton v. Lehman

563 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 19, 1983

Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 , 93 S.Ct. 1241 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). … See Neal v. Secretary of Navy, 639 F.2d 1029, 1037 (3d Cir.1981). The applicable standard of judicial review was enunciated in Sanders v.

Marino v. Bowers

483 F. Supp. 765 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1980

Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), and Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). The instant case is distinguishable from Boyce . … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Whether a public employee has such a claim of entitlement is decided “by reference to state law.” Bishop v.

Piech v. Midvale-Heppenstall Co.

594 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 22, 1984

In Murphy v. … UAW v.

McCrae v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

97 F.R.D. 490 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1983

We note that the major focus of the memo-randa for both sides to this motion has been the ■ applicability of the defense under Pennsylvania law in light of Brown v. … Brown v. Caterpillar, 696 F.2d at 249 . . Compare White v.

Royston v. Eastern Empire Corporation

393 F. Supp. 1010 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1975

Landy v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 486 F.2d 139 (3rd Cir. 1973). In a well reasoned Opinion by Judge Rosenn the Court in Landy v. … The district court held the plaintiffs had no standing to sue derivatively absent a showing of fraud or collusion by the board of directors in refusing to bring the action. Ash v.

Ruffin v. DIVISION THREE, NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUST. BD.

368 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1973

Individual claimants may present their claims to the board. 275 F.2d at 345. … Roberts v. Lehigh and New England Ry. Co., 323 F.2d 219 (3d Cir. 1963); Clemens v. Central R. R.

Eagle Fence Co., Inc. v. v. Elec., Inc.

324 F. Supp. 2d 621 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 2004

See Campanella v. … But see Wright v.

McHugh v. TEAMSTERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF PHILA.

638 F. Supp. 1036 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 1986

See also Peckham v. Board of Trustees, 653 F.2d 424, 426-28 (10th Cir.1981); Gomez v. Lewis, 414 F.2d 1312, 1315-16 (3d Cir.1969); Freeman v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 86 Lab.Cas. … Browning-Ferris Industries, 767 F.2d 52 , 54-55 (3d Cir.1985); Kemmis v. McGoldrick, 706 F.2d 993, 996-97 (9th Cir.1983); Lewis v.

Simpson v. The Ceres

22 F. Cas. 172 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 1879

Law, 652; Railroad Co. v. Towboat Co., 23 How. [64 U. S.] 209; The Commerce, 1 Black [66 U. S.] 574; The Agincourt, 1 Hagg. Adm. 271; The Lowther Castle, Id. 384; Brown v. Overton [Case No. 2,024]; Chamberlain v. … Chandler [Id. 2,575]; West v. The Uncle Sam [Id. 17,427]; Sherwood v. Hall [Id. 12,777]; The Plymouth, 3 Wall [70 U. S.] 34; Taber v. Jenny [Case No. 13,720]; The Sylph, L. R. 2 Adm. & Ecc. 24; Atlee v.

Buszka v. Johnson

351 F. Supp. 771 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 6, 1972

Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, supra, 407 F.2d at 940 . … Ford v. Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, supra, 407 F.2d at 940 .

Castro-Louzan v. Zimmerman

94 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1950

Vajtauer v. Commissioner of Immigration, 273 U.S. 103 , 47 S.Ct. 302 , 71 L.Ed. 560 ; Nicoli v. Briggs, 10 Cir., 83 F.2d 375 . … Bufalino v. Irvine, 10 Cir., 103 F.2d 830 . It was also stated in Bridges v.

Smith v. The Joseph Stewart

22 F. Cas. 582 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1838

In Warder v. La Belle Creole [Case No. 17,165], the judge, professing? to give “an exemplary reward,” allowed one-third, in a strong ease of service and danger. In Tyson v. … In Bond v. The Cora [Id. 1,620], one-third the gross amount of sales was allowed. In Weeks v.