Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspaed

10,000+ results

1.90s

  • Hackett v. President of Philadelphia

    298 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1969

    Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105, 109 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 (1967), and Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.S. 112, 117 , 87 S.Ct. 1554 , 18 L.Ed.2d 656 (1967). … Carr, supra, and Avery v. Midland County, supra.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Tidewater Dock Co. v. National Maritime Union of America

    206 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1962

    See, also Marino Engineers Beneficial Ass’n v. Interlake SS. Co., 82 S.Ct. 1237 . . See Navios Corp. v. Nat. M. … See, also, Baker v. Shopmen’s Local U. No. 775, 403 Pa. 31 , 168 A.2d 340 (1961), and Wax v. Int.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sacred Heart Medical Center v. Williamson

    637 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1986

    In Newburgh v. … See, e.g., Verna v. Verna, 288 Pa.Super. 511, 514-16 , 432 A.2d 630, 631-32 (1981) (per curiam); cf. Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • The Ciano

    69 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1946

    Milling Co. v. Hauptman, 9 Cir., 1938, 95 F.2d 286 ; Niel Maersk, 2 Cir., 1937, 91 F.2d 932 ; Roberts & Co. v. Calmar S.S. Corp., D.C. E.D.Pa., 1945, 59 F.Supp. 203 . … See Stirnimann v. The San Diego, 2 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 141 ; The Solveig, D.C.N.D.Cal., 1914, 217 F. 805 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Railroad v. The Marie Leonhardt

    179 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1959

    See Dowling v. Isthmian S. S. Corp., 3 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 758 ; cf. Brown v. Isthmian Steamship Corp., D.C.E.D.Pa.1948, 79 F.Supp. 701 ; Atlass v. … See Dowling v. Isthmian, etc., infra. . Cf. order of December 8, 1959, by Judge Kraft in Tanker Transport, Inc. v. Barge Interstate No. 8, No. 231 of 1958 in Admiralty, and Boyer v. S. S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Summers v. Myken

    184 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1960

    Ashley v. Brown, 1930, 198 N.C. 369 , 151 S.E. 725, 728 ; Appendix VII. … (B) Ashley v. Brown, 1930, 198 N.C. 369 , 151 S.E. 725 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lattanzio v. Security National Bank

    825 F. Supp. 86 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1993

    The court reasoned first, that the director did not perform employee functions; union officers under the board’s direction performed the daily operations. Id. Second, the board reported to no one other than itself. … The court found the first two factors were compelling enough that it made its determination despite the lack of evidence needed to determine whether the board answered to anyone else. Id.; ‘ see also E.E.O.C. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lett v. Volatile

    52 F.R.D. 564 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1971

    United States v. Bowser, 327 F.Supp. 755 (E.D.Pa., filed June 7, 1971). Since the Supreme Court decided in Ehlert v. … United States v. Bowser, supra. Thus, the Local Board did not err in failing to send Lett SSS Form 150.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pao v. Holy Redeemer Hospital

    547 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1982

    Notice to the Board of Directors was notice to its individual members. See Skyers v. … Gallagher and the Hospital’s Board of Directors as defendants in this case.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • United States v. Moore

    378 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1974

    United States v. Dukow, 453 F.2d 1328, 1330 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972); United States v. Brown, 354 F.Supp. 1000 (E.D.Pa.1973). … United States v. Benson, 487 F.2d 978, 985 (3rd Cir. 1973); United States v. Dukow, supra; United States v. Hanna, 347 F.Supp. 1010, 1014 (D.Del.1972); United States v. Tate, 336 F.Supp. 58, 62 (E.D.Pa.1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Livornese v. Medical Protective Co.

    253 F. Supp. 2d 821 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 2003

    In Browne v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Co., 713 A.2d 663, 665 (Pa.Super.1998), the Superior Court addressed whether an insurer’s liability, capped by its policy limits, includes post-judgment interest. … I also note that MedPro, in arguing that its liability is capped at $400,000, relies heavily on a statement in a footnote in Browne v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McNeil v. City of Easton

    694 F. Supp. 2d 375 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 2010

    Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E. for M.E., 172 F.3d 238, 252 (3d Cir.1999); Guinan v. A.I. duPont Hospital for Children, 597 F.Supp.2d 485, 493 (E.D.Pa.2009) (Surrick, J.). … In Brown v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

    474 F. Supp. 2d 720 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 2007

    Fe-bres v. Camden Board of Education, 445 F.3d 227 , 229 (3d Cir.2006); Benn v. First Judicial District, 426 F.3d 233 , 239-40 (3d Cir.2005). … SEPTA v. Board of Revision of Taxes, 574 Pa. 707, 720 , 833 A.2d 710, 717 (Pa. 2003).(In its role as a commercial landlord, SEPTA is obligated to pay real estate tax).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MILLER v. GOGGIN

    District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 2023

    at or attending school board meetings on behalf of a group of parents. … See Brown v. City of Phila. Office of Human Res., 735 F. 22 “The dismissal is without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to file the claims in the appropriate forum.” Olick, 2016 WL 6679880, at *4 (citing Degenes v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Paoli RR Yard PCB Litigation

    706 F. Supp. 358 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 28, 1988

    Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. BURRELL v. SEPTA, et al. CUMMINS v. SEPTA, et al. COHEN & GARON v. SEPTA, et al. THOMPSON v. SEPTA, et al. JONES v. SEPTA, et al. LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. … Cathlene BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Craig BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. BARBETTA v. SEPTA, et al. JOHNSON v. SEPTA, et al. Celeste BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Clemmon BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Cloyd BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Curtis BROWN v.

    Reversed by In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb Litigation, 916 F.2d 829 (1990)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Aytch

    472 F. Supp. 908 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 1979

    Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). The presence of birds at Rockview already has been found to be cruel and unusual punishment by Judge Muir in Brown v. … or persons whom the board of inspectors, if there be such board, otherwise the superintendent or official in charge, shall specify and designate: Provided, however, That before any transfer is made as aforesaid the court

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Globus Medical, Inc.

    259 F. Supp. 3d 225 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 2017

    Certainteed Ceilings, 2015 WL 410029 , at *9, citing Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola, 745 F.Supp.2d 588, 621 (E.D. Pa. 2010); Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc. v. Bonnani, No. 13-2528, 2014 WL 1612632 , at *7 (M.D. Pa. … Likewise, in Brown & Brown, Inc. v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Sorenson v. Williams

    207 F. Supp. 184 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 18, 1962

    United States v. Underwood, 151 F.Supp. 874, 876 (E.D. Pa.1955). … United States v. Schoebel, 201 F.2d 31, 32 (7th Cir. 1953). Accord: Boyd v. United States, 269 F. 2d 607 (9th Cir. 1959); Keene v. United States, 266 F.2d 378 (10th Cir. 1959).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Liberty Resources, Inc. v. Philadelphia Housing Authority

    528 F. Supp. 2d 553 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2007

    Of LRI’s sixteen board members, eleven are individuals with mobility disabilities. … In Alexander v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Krystal Cadillac-Oldsmobile-GMC Truck, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

    232 B.R. 622 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 1999

    One day prior thereto, plaintiff filed an appeal of the termination to the Pennsylvania Board of Vehicle Manufacturers, Dealers and Salespersons (the “Vehicle Board”) under the Pennsylvania Board of Vehicles Act, 63 P.S. … In re Colbert v. Anderson, 117 B.R. 51, 53 (Bankr.D.Conn.1990) citing, inter alia, Wood v. Wood, 825 F.2d 90, 97 (5th Cir.1987).

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.