Case law

MCGUIGAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 2026

No. 46]; 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963) (stating that those on parole are “in custody” for habeas relief). 6 Commonwealth v. McGuigan, No. 222 EDA 2018 (Mar. 18, 2009), Resp. Opp. … P. 4(c). 45 See Bond v. VisionQuest, 410 Fed.

Holmes v. Hutchinson

12 F. Cas. 416 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1833

He says, in the case of Walton v. … In the ease of Harden v.

United States ex rel. Seiple v. Byers

127 F. 993 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 22, 1904

Johnson v. Halloway, 42 Pa. 446 [ 82 Am. … Rep. 563 ]; Diehl v. Rodgers, 169 Pa. 316 [ 32 Atl. 424 , 47 Am. St. Rep. 908 ]; Haley v. Clark, 26 Ala. 439 ; People v. Moore, 62 Mich. 496 129 N. W. 80 ]; State v. Sloss, 25 Mo. 291 [ 69 Am. Dec. 467 ]; Tennessee v.

The Cripple Creek

52 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1943

Cloutman v. Tunison, C.C.Mass. 1833, Fed.Cas. No. 2,-907; Coffin v. Jenkins, C.C.Mass. 1844, Fed. Cas. No. 2,948. … While there seems to be a paucity of authority on the point, reference is made to Johnson v. Blanchard, D.C., 7 F. 597 ; Brink v.

Purcell v. Keane

277 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1967

Indeed the Board was to determine whether or not to take the officers into court. … Penuelas v. Moreno, 198 F.Supp. 441 (S.D.Calif. 1961).

Troiani v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

570 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 25, 1983

The ruling here is limited to the review by the plan’s General Pension Board. In contrast, arbitration has not been shown here to be clearly applicable and required. Compare Lewis v. … The General Pension Board, having fiduciary obligations to the plaintiff, should be reminded of the strong public policy against forfeiture of pension benefits. See, NLRB v.

Reed v. Steamship Yaka

183 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 1960

At that moment one of the facing boards of the top pallet of the staging upon which libellant was standing broke, and libellant’s right foot fell through onto the boards of the pallet underneath. 30. … However, in Grillea v.

In Re REA Express, Inc., Private Treble Damage, Etc.

412 F. Supp. 1239 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1976

Co. v. … Hotel Co. v.

Pocono Invitational Sports Camp, Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

317 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2004

United States v. Brown Univ., 5 F.3d 658 , 668 (3d Cir.1993). … Brown Univ., 5 F.3d at 668.

Constitution Bank v. DiMarco

815 F. Supp. 154 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1993

Martin v. Brown, 758 F.Supp. 313, 319 (W.D.Pa.1990) citing Marshall-Silver Construction Company v. Mendel, 835 F.2d 63 (3d Cir.1987). … Martin v. Brown, 758 F.Supp. 313, 319 (W.D.Pa.1990).

United States ex rel. Milligan v. Rundle

261 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1966

We conclude that the relator’s will was completely overborne, Davis v. … Perpiglia v. Rundle, 221 F.Supp. 1003 (E.D.Pa. 1963); United States ex rel. Cuevas v. Rundle, 258 F.Supp. 647 (E.D.Pa. 1966). We express to John B.

Voutrey v. General Baking Co.

39 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1941

In California Prune & Apricot Growers’ Ass’n v. … In Hunkin-Conkey Construction Company v.

SWEDA v. UPPER BUCKS COUNTY TECHNICAL SCHOOL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 18, 2023

Brown v. City of Philadelphia, 541 F. Supp. 3d 605, 631 (E.D. Pa. 2021) (quoting De Ritis v. McGarrigle, 861 F.3d 444, 454 (3d Cir. 2017)). … Brown, 541 F. Supp. 3d at 631. Plaintiff alleges that the meeting in which he verbally opposed the proposed policy was a public, regularly scheduled school board meeting.

Hand v. The Elvira

11 F. Cas. 413 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1829

An early and leading case in this district, is that of Warder v. La Belle Creole [Case No. 17,165]. … The case of The Cora [Bond v. The Cora, Case No. 3,621] was a deplorable case of distress.

LANDRY v. WEST CAIN TOWNSHIP

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2025

Brown, NO. 24-6315 Plaintiff, v. … Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997).

Ziegler v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.

78 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1947

Calmar Steamship Corp. v. Taylor, 303 U.S. 525 , 58 S.Ct. 651 , 82 L.Ed. 993 ; Loverich v. Warner Co., 3 Cir., 118 F.2d 690 ; The Point Fermin, 5 Cir., 70 F.2d 602 . … The identical argument was urged in other cases (Shields v. United States, D. C., 73 F.Supp. 862 ; Jones v.

United States v. Randolph

210 F. Supp. 2d 586 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 2002

Agent Taylor arrived at the house armed with an order of the Parole Board to detain Randolph for an initial period of forty-eight *588 hours, an order later that day made without time limit by the Parole Board’s warrant to … We also know from Hudson v.

Williams v. Pennsylvania Co.

367 F. Supp. 1158 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1973

Saunders, Bevan, Gerstnecker, Hodge and Angus Wynne, Jr. were then elected to the Arvida board. … Coffee v. Permian Corp., 434 F.2d 383 (C.A. 5, 1970), and Dudley v.

Stelwagon Manufacturing Co. v. Tarmac Roofing System, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1994

Spence v. Board of Educ. of Christina Sch. Dist., 806 F.2d 1198 , 1201 (3d Cir.1986); see 11 Charles A. Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2815 (1973). … Sheehan, 378 Pa. 33 , 105 A.2d 706, 707 (1954); Hatbob v. Brown, 394 Pa.Super. 234 , 575 A.2d 607, 612 (1990).

Henley v. Octorara Area School District

701 F. Supp. 545 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 1988

board meetings where other members of the public could attend. … There is no evidence that the school board would interpret the ban as applying to school board meetings.