Case law

Gintowt v. TL VENTURES

226 F. Supp. 2d 672 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2002

Dixon repeatedly asked for Plaintiffs Board resignation and exerted “intolerable pressure and indignities” on Plaintiff until he finally left the Board. Id. … See, e.g., Glessner v.

United States ex rel. Hasan v. Gernert

297 F. Supp. 1301 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1969

This, it is contended, amounted to an unconstitutional suppression of evidence by the Commonwealth entitling the relator to a new trial and discharge from the custody of the State Board of Parole. … Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 , 87 S.Ct. 793 , 17 L.Ed.2d 737 (1967); Brady v. Maryland, supra; Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 , 79 S.Ct. 1173 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959); United States ex rel. Felton v.

Tomlinson v. Trustees of University of Pennsylvania

164 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1958

Knecht v. St. Mary’s Hospital, 1958, 392 Pa. 75 , 140 A.2d 30 ; Bond v. Pittsburgh, 1951, 368 Pa. 404 , 84 A.2d 328 ; Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League, 1946, 353 Pa. 408 , 45 A.2d 59 ; Gable v. Sisters of St. … Ginty v. Y. W. C. A., 1930, 32 Lack Jur. 29. The recent statement in Knecht v. St.

Hummel v. Brennan

469 F. Supp. 1180 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1979

Two days later, a notice was posted on all bulletin boards at the five plants by the Executive Board indicating that the issue of a dues increase would be voted upon at “your Shop Unit meeting.” … by the plaintiffs protesting the Local board’s decision.

United States v. Sybron Corporation

329 F. Supp. 919 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

As to dental professional equipment, this proposed submarket does not accord with industry recognition or meet any of the other tests set out in Brown Shoe Co. v. … The defendant’s position is difficult to maintain, when measured against the market share statistics in other vertical cases, Brown Shoe, supra; United States Steel Co. v.

Gniotek v. City of Philadelphia

630 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1986

All parties rely on the due process procedural require *833 ments recently enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-78 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-10 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Property interests are created by state law. Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976).

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar Ass'n

872 F. Supp. 1346 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1994

Cipollone v. … V.

Zinman v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

567 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1983

In RFC v. … Cooper v.

McEnteer v. Clarke

644 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1986

See Richards v. United States, 361 U.S. 1 , 9 (1962); Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470, 480 , 37 S.Ct. 192, 193 , 61 L.Ed. 442 (1917). Cf. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. … Inc. v. Board of Governors, 472 U.S. 159 , 105 S.Ct. 2545, 2553-2554 , 86 L.Ed.2d 112 (1985).

Pocono Invitational Sports Camp, Inc. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

317 F. Supp. 2d 569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2004

United States v. Brown Univ., 5 F.3d 658 , 668 (3d Cir.1993). … Brown Univ., 5 F.3d at 668.

In re La France Industries Inc.

42 F. Supp. 642 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 7, 1942

First: In Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc., v. … Brown’s services covered a comparatively short period, about a year from January, 1938, to February, 1939, and in part were duplicated, or at least assisted, by Messrs. Hayes and Gossling.

Silverman v. Eastrich Multiple Investor Fund, L.P.

857 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1994

In its brief, Eastrich cites Boatmen’s First National Bank v. … Winkler KG v. Stoller, 839 F.2d 1002, 1008 (3d Cir.1988)).

Hersh v. Department of the Navy

456 F. Supp. 227 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1978

In Brown v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Gissen v. Tackman, 537 F.2d 784 (3d Cir. 1976).

Sellers v. Local 1598, District Council 88, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO

614 F. Supp. 141 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1985

A step three hearing was to be held in front of the Board of Supervisors, which is composed of five (5) members, three Republican and two Democrats. … North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 , 92 S.Ct. 402, 404 , 30 L.Ed.2d 413 (1971).

Schier v. Temple University

576 F. Supp. 1569 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1984

Isaacs v. Board of Trustees of Temple University, 385 F.Supp. 473 (E.D.Pa.1974). … Its board of trustees was also restructured. There are now thirty-six voting members of the board pursuant to state legislation, plus three ex officio members of the board.

United States ex rel. Tomasello v. Smith

50 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1943

Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49 , 63 S.Ct. 99 , 87 L.Ed.-. … As such it is entitled to a liberal construction and one which will effect the purposes of Congress. 6 Scalia v. United States, 1 Cir., 62 F.2d 220 ; United States v. Antinori, 5 Cir., 59 F.2d 171 ; Reeves v.

Oliver v. Calmar S. S. Co

33 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1940

Oliver, a seaman on board the S. S. … The Alector (D.C.) 263 F. 1007 ; Chandler v. The Annie Buckman, 5 Fed.Cas. 449, No. 2,591a; Pierce v. Patton, 19 Fed.Cas. 636, No. 11,145; Lortie v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. [9 Cir.] 78 F. (2d) 819; Meyer v.

Paralegal v. Lawyer

783 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1992

Id. at 701 ; See also, Molush v. Orkin Exterminating Co., 547 F.Supp. 54 (E.D.Pa.1982); Rettinger v. American Can Co., 574 F.Supp. 306, 311 (M.D.Pa.1983). … See, Schmuck v. U.S., 489 U.S. 705, 710 , 109 S.Ct. 1443, 1447 , 103 L.Ed.2d 734 ; But see, U.S. v. Peruto, Criminal No. 91-00506, 1992 WL 10475 (E.D.Pa.1992).

MCGUIGAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 4, 2026

No. 46]; 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236, 243 (1963) (stating that those on parole are “in custody” for habeas relief). 6 Commonwealth v. McGuigan, No. 222 EDA 2018 (Mar. 18, 2009), Resp. Opp. … P. 4(c). 45 See Bond v. VisionQuest, 410 Fed.

Lemon v. Kurtzman

310 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1970

Most recently, in Board of Education v. … Justice Harlan, concurring in Board of Education v.