Case law

United States Ex Rel. Weidman v. Sweeney

117 F. Supp. 739 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1953

Seldner v. Mellis, supra. … S. v. Fisk, 3 Wall. 445 , 70 U.S. 445 , 18 L.Ed. 243 ; Kerlin’s Lessee v. Bull, 1 Dall. 175 , 1 U.S. 175 , 178, 1 L.Ed. 88 , 89; and Travelers Insurance Co. v. Norton, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 243, 246 .

In Re Brown

311 B.R. 409 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2004

Tolve v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 31 Fed.Appx. 73, 75 (3d Cir. Mar.22, 2002), citing Washington v. … Finally, the Court further looked to Robbins v.

CARPENTER

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 2021

Brown v. Farrelly, 994 F.2d 1027, 1038 (3d Cir. 1993). … While “pro se litigants are not entitled to special treatment,” Brown v. City of Philadelphia, Civ. A. Nos. 05-4160, 06-2496, 06-5408, 08-3369, 2009 WL 1011966, at *15 (E.D. Pa.

Gniotek v. City of Philadelphia

630 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1986

All parties rely on the due process procedural require *833 ments recently enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-78 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708-10 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Property interests are created by state law. Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976).

Jazz Pharm., Inc. v. Synchrony Grp., LLC

343 F. Supp. 3d 434 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 3, 2018

Certainteed Ceilings Corp. , 2015 WL 410029 at *7 (citing Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Cola , 745 F.Supp.2d 588 , 619-20 (E.D. Pa. 2010) ). DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Globus Med., Inc. , 259 F.Supp.3d 225 , 234 (E.D. … App'x 816 , 819 (3d Cir. 2016) ); see also Brown & Brown, Inc. , 745 F.Supp.2d at 620 ("Whether the gist of the action doctrine applies in any particular setting is a question of law."). Bohler-Uddeholm Am., Inc. v.

Zinman v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

567 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1983

In RFC v. … Cooper v.

United States v. Rutkowski

337 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1971

Dickey v. … United States v. Feldman, 425 F.2d 688, 691 (3rd Cir. 1970); see also, United States v. Childs, 415 F.2d 535 (3rd Cir. 1969).

Crandall v. Conole

230 F. Supp. 705 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 25, 1964

V. Conole tried to make his son Chief Executive Officer in February, 1963, the proposal was voted down by the Board. … held on December 21, 1963, and the Minutes of the regular Board meeting held on January 28, 1964 at Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania; to approve and ratify all prior acts of the Board of Directors; to amend the By-Laws to provide

Wharton v. Vaughn

371 F. Supp. 3d 195 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 2019

See Johnson v. McCaughtry , 265 F.3d 559 , 564 (7th Cir. 2001) ; Every v. Blackburn , 781 F.2d 1138 , 1140-41 (5th Cir. 1986). … See Commonwealth v. Brown , 196 A.3d 130 , 141-49 (Pa. 2018).

Tomlinson v. Trustees of University of Pennsylvania

164 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1958

Knecht v. St. Mary’s Hospital, 1958, 392 Pa. 75 , 140 A.2d 30 ; Bond v. Pittsburgh, 1951, 368 Pa. 404 , 84 A.2d 328 ; Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League, 1946, 353 Pa. 408 , 45 A.2d 59 ; Gable v. Sisters of St. … Ginty v. Y. W. C. A., 1930, 32 Lack Jur. 29. The recent statement in Knecht v. St.

Wenzer v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

464 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1979

Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Bd., 320 U.S. 297, 301 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 (1943). This principle was explained in Renegotiation Board v. … Local governmental entities which contributed to the funding were represented on the system’s Board of Managers by local elected officials, who served on the Board in their ex officio capacities. Id.

Shiffler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

609 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 28, 1985

The principles which govern the issues raised by the present motion were quite recently addressed by Justice Brennan, speaking for a unanimous Court, in Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. … Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 , 34 S.Ct. 724, 724-25 , 58 L.Ed. 1218 (1914) quoted in Franchise Tax Board, supra, at 103 S.Ct. 2846 .

Wilson v. The Ohio

30 F. Cas. 149 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 24, 1834

I have turned to my opinion in the case of Smith v. The Pekin [Case No. 13,090], which was a libel for wages. … In the case of Ross v.

Kelly v. City of Philadelphia

552 F. Supp. 574 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 1982

Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794-95 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Skehan v. … Board of Trustees, supra, 590 F.2d at 477, quoting Davis v. United States Steel Supply, 581 F.2d 335, 339 (3d Cir.1978).

Gintowt v. TL VENTURES

226 F. Supp. 2d 672 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2002

Dixon repeatedly asked for Plaintiffs Board resignation and exerted “intolerable pressure and indignities” on Plaintiff until he finally left the Board. Id. … See, e.g., Glessner v.

Hummel v. Brennan

469 F. Supp. 1180 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1979

Two days later, a notice was posted on all bulletin boards at the five plants by the Executive Board indicating that the issue of a dues increase would be voted upon at “your Shop Unit meeting.” … by the plaintiffs protesting the Local board’s decision.

MOHN v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 2023

American Bar Ass’n, 872 F, Supp. 1346, 1349 (E.D, Pa. 1994)). 2 United States v. Bergrin, 682 F.3d 261, 282 (3d Cir, 2012) (quoting Liteky, 510 U.S. at 555). 13 See also Brown v. United States, 823 F. … '4 Brown, 823 F. App’x at 103; Jn re Mazza, No. 22-3053, 2023 WL 128934, at *2 (3d Cir. Jan. 9, 2023) (per curiam) (quoting Securacomm Consulting, Inc. v, Securacom Inc., 224 F.3d 273, 278 (3d Cir. 2000)). 13 Td.

Oliver v. Calmar S. S. Co

33 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1940

Oliver, a seaman on board the S. S. … The Alector (D.C.) 263 F. 1007 ; Chandler v. The Annie Buckman, 5 Fed.Cas. 449, No. 2,591a; Pierce v. Patton, 19 Fed.Cas. 636, No. 11,145; Lortie v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. [9 Cir.] 78 F. (2d) 819; Meyer v.

SodexoMAGIC, LLC v. Drexel Univ.

291 F. Supp. 3d 681 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2018

."); Okum v. … Melissa Brown, a lawyer, provides legal advice, which Joe Campbell (a non-lawyer) forwards to Rita LaRue (a non-lawyer), while making clear that his response is based on Ms. Brown's counsel.

Lemon v. Kurtzman

310 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1970

Most recently, in Board of Education v. … Justice Harlan, concurring in Board of Education v.