Case law

Wolser v. Joshua Slocum, Ltd. (In Re Joshua Slocum, Ltd.)

109 B.R. 101 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 1989

Mainline Theatres v. Paramount Distributing Corp., 298 F.2d 801 , 803 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 370 U.S. 939 , 82 S.Ct. 1585 , 8 L.Ed.2d 807 (1962); Pugh v. Super Fresh Food Markets, 640 F.Supp. 1306 (E.D.Pa. 1986). … Burton, individually and in their capacity as members of the Board of Directors of Joshua Slocum Ltd.

United States ex rel. Goldstein v. McNamara

270 F. Supp. 892 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1967

Eagles v. United States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U.S. 304 , 67 S.Ct. 313 , 91 L.Ed. 308 (1946); United States ex rel. Weidman v. Sweeney, 117 F.Supp. 739 (E.D.Pa.1953). … Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 (1946); see also, Eagles v. United States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U.S. 304 , 67 S.Ct. 313 (1946). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1.

Marra Bros. v. Cardillo

59 F. Supp. 368 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1945

In Henderson v. … Kattera v. Burrell Construction & Supply Co., 152 Pa.Super. 591 , 33 A. 2d 498, 499, 1943 .

HALL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 2026

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF NO. 23-2681 PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent. … See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 4. The Clerk of Court shall MARK this case CLOSED.

Posner v. Lankenau Hospital

645 F. Supp. 1102 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1986

Adler v. … O’Neill v.

Coover v. Saucon Valley School District

955 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1997

She makes this claim under Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Watters v. … Defendant Board Members were relying on the advice of Solicitor Steele, who drafted the July 19th letter and presented it to Coover. See Kincade v.

Good v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.

55 F. Supp. 3d 742 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2014

Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 453-54 (3d Cir.2006). This is a low standard. … Brown v. Card Serv. Ctr., 464 F.3d 450 , 455 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting Wilson v. Quadramed Corp., 225 F.3d 350, 354 (3d Cir. 2000)). .

Askew v. Trustees of the General Assembly of Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc.

776 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 2011

Gotha v. … Brown, who testified that Kenneth Shelton is the General Overseer of the Church and that he is the highest adjudicatory body of the Church. Deposition of John R. Brown (“Brown Dep.”) at 81, 94, 98.

Powell v. Pennsylvania Railroad

166 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1958

The thing to be ascertained is not what the Brotherhood thought or intended but what the Adjustment Board actually did. The Brotherhood was under a duty to represent all of the members of the craft. Conley v. … The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit was presented with a similar problem in Kirby v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 188 F.2d 793, 796 .

Garcia v. DOVER SHIPPING COMPANY

380 F. Supp. 607 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1974

A j'acob’s ladder is of widespread use for boarding ships. … McPhee v. Reichel, 461 F.2d 947, 948 (3rd Cir. 1972); James v. Continental Ins. Co., 424 F.2d 1064, 1065 (3rd Cir. 1970).

Lewis v. Hills

457 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1978

Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 577 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 738 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481 , 92 S.Ct. 2593, 2600 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). In Board of Regents v. … Rather, in determining “whether due process requirements apply in the first place, we must look not to the ‘weight’ but to the nature of the interest at stake,” Board of Regents v.

Axelrod v. Stoltz

264 F. Supp. 536 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 15, 1967

Defendants are the Hotel, Motel and Club Employees’ Union Local 568, AFL (Local), the president and the secretary of Local and the Philadelphia Local Joint Executive Board of the International Union (Joint Executive Board … See Lowery v. International Bhd. of Boilermakers, 241 Miss. 458 , 130 So. 2d 831, 838 (1961); Leibson v. Henry, 356 Mo. 953 , 204 S.W.2d 310 (1947); Black, Law Dictionary 1615-16 (4th ed. 1951); cf. Bishop v.

United States v. Palmer

122 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1954

According to Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 , 88 L.Ed. 305 , Billings v. Truesdell, 321 U.S. 542 , 64 S.Ct. 737 , 88 L.Ed. 917 , Estep v. … Alicea v. United States, 1 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 870 . . Schwartz v. Strauss, 2 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 767 (concurring opinion of Judge Frank); United States v. Tomlinson, D.C.E.D.Pa.1950, 94 F.Supp. 854, 858 . .

United States ex rel. Pope v. Williams

326 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1971

California, 406 F.2d 39 (9th Cir. 1969); Paige v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole, 311 F.Supp. 940 (E.D.Pa.1970); Gallagher v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 287 F.Supp. 610 (E.D.Pa.1968). … Ford v. Board of Mgrs. of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (3rd Cir. 1969); Gurcznski v. Yeager, 339 F.2d 884 (3rd Cir. 1964); United States ex rel. Duronio v. Russell, 256 F.Supp. 479 (M.D.Pa.1966).

Zizi v. Bausman

306 F. Supp. 3d 697 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 29, 2018

the burden, even though both the Board and USCIS director recited the correct one. … Zizi's final argument is that the decision by the Board is arbitrary and capricious.

Page v. McNamara

263 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1967

See, e. g., McCurdy v. Zuckert, 359 F.2d 491 (C.A.5, 1966). … McCurdy v. Zuckert, supra; Schwartz v. Covington, 341 F.2d 537 (C.A.9, 1965); Reed v. Franke, 297 F.2d 17 (C.A.4, 1961); Michaelson v. Herren, 242 F.2d 693 (C.A. 2, 1957).

Favors v. Randall

40 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 9, 1941

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 ; McCabe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 235 U.S. 151 , 35 S.Ct. 69 , 59 L.Ed. 169 ; Gong Lum v. … As was very pertinently stated by Justice Brown in Plessy v.

Pitts v. Kunsman

251 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1966

Carr, 369 U.S. 186 , 82 S.Ct. 691 , 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962); Delozier v. Tyrone Area School Board, 247 F.Supp. 30 (W.D.Pa.1965). … Tyrone Area School Board, 247 F.Supp. *966 30 (W.D.Pa.1965); Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 234 F.Supp. 945 (D.Md.1964).

BUSKIRK

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2026

BUSKIRK, : Plaintiff, : : v. … Following the resentencing, Judge Dally submitted a formal request to the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (the “Board”) asking that Mr. Buskirk be accepted for “special probation.” (ECF No. 51-8 at 1.)

Roberts v. Trapnell

213 F. Supp. 47 · District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1962

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167, 187, 191 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); Egan v. City of Aurora, Ill., 365 U.S. 514 , 81 S.Ct. 684 , 5 L.Ed.2d 741 (1961); Hewitt v. … See, also, United States v. State of Alabama, 171 F.Supp. 720 (M.D.Ala.1959), where it was held at pp. 726-728 that “The Board of Registrars of Macon County, Alabama” could not be sued under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1971 .