The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EARL HALL, CIVIL ACTION
Petitioner,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF NO. 23-2681
PROBATION AND PAROLE,
Respondent.
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2026, upon consideration of pro se petitioner’s
Revised Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF 6), and the Report
and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pamela A. Carlos (ECF 22), and the
Court noting that no objections having been filed despite the passage of time for doing so, IT IS
ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Pamela A.
Carlos (ECF 22) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Pro se petitioner’s Revised Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (ECF 6) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not
debate the propriety of this Court’s procedural rulings with respect to petitioner’s claims. See 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court shall MARK this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Kelley B. Hodge
HODGE, KELLEY B., J.