Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

0.89s

  • Henkels & McCoy, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    738 A.2d 1 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 1999

    See also Cashmark v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Great A & P Tea Co.), 135 Pa.Cmwlth. 464 , 580 A.2d 1189 (1990), and Vas v. … See Brown v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (City of Pittsburgh), 134 Pa.Cmwlth. 31 , 578 A.2d 69 (1990), appeal denied, 527 Pa. 652 , 593 A.2d 423 (1991); Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Chacko v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    49 Pa. Commw. 148 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1980

    In Hicks v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 34 Pa. … As we said in Millersville State College v. Unemployment Board of Review, 18 Pa.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Elliott Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    29 A.3d 881 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 2011

    Moreover, the Majority has substituted, and improperly so, its findings of fact for those of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board). … Furthermore, the Board’s brief in this matter, also quite comprehensively, describes how the Findings of Fact are adequate to support the conclusion reached by the Board.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hackett v. Zoning Hearing Board

    58 Pa. Commw. 433 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1981

    it was not “in writing,” and hence, the March 2 appeal by objectors was not filed within the statutory thirty-day period which, as Foltz v. … We have currently decided precisely the same question in Borough of Brookhaven v. Zoning Hearing Board of Borough of Brookhaven, 57 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Adjustment v. Brandi

    36 Pa. Commw. 377 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1978

    After a hearing, the Board denied the application on the ground that Brandi had not met the criteria necessary for the Board to grant a ■variance. … Durkin Contracting Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 211 , 293 A.2d 622 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bowlin v. Zoning Hearing Board

    55 Pa. Commw. 293 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1980

    DiNardo v. City of Pittsburgh, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 279 , 325 A.2d 654 (1974). … McGeehan v. Zoning Hearing Board of Springfield Township, 45 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 403 , 407 A.2d 56 (1979). We must conclude that they failed to meet that burden.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South Whitford Associates, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    157 Pa. Commw. 387 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1993

    We may only determine whether the board or the supervisors committed a *395 manifest abuse of discretion or an error of law. Mill Valley Associates v. … Beaver Gasoline Company v. Osborne Borough, 445 Pa. 571 , 285 A.2d 501 (1971).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Home Insurance Companies v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    98 Pa. Commw. 249 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1986

    Barna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation), 88 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 83 , 88 n.4, 488 A.2d 651 , 654 n.4 (1985). … The referee set aside the petition on November 30, 1982, but the Barna decision was a logical extension of Beissel v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wesley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    688 A.2d 789 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 4, 1997

    Kirkwood v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 106 Pa.Cmwlth. 92 , 525 A.2d 841 (1987). . … Fritzo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa.Cmwlth. 268 , 429 A.2d 1215 (1981). .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    110 Pa. Commw. 619 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 2, 1987

    The referee then discussed case law authorities such as Schreckengost v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 43 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 587 , 403 A.2d 165 (1979), Maher v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 207 Pa. … In Port Authority of Allegheny Cty. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 70 Pa.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Yoh v. Board of Commissioners

    37 Pa. Commw. 91 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 31, 1978

    See Camp Hill Development Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 13 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 519 , 319 A.2d 197 (1974). … In Kaufman and Broad, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of West Whiteland Township, 20 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    69 Pa. Commw. 405 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1982

    Frey (claimant), appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that during the seven weeks beginning January 12, 1980 and ending February 23, 1980, she was not able and available for suitable … Humanic v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 428, 430 , 423 A.2d 64, 65 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pearson v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newlin Township

    765 A.2d 1187 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2001

    Kissell v. Ferguson Township Zoning Hearing Board, 729 A.2d 194 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). … South Coventry Township Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • M.A. Brown v. UCBR

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 2024

    Similarly, in Drach v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Pa. … Brown, : Petitioner : : v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Virgilio v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    760 A.2d 1207 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2000

    In support, Employer cites Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Patton), 537 Pa. 426 , 644 A.2d 726 (1994), Eljer Industries *1209 v. … See also Brimmer v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (North American Refractories), 749 A.2d 1010 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000); Eljer. Also, in Miles v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Swemley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Windsor Township

    698 A.2d 160 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 1997

    King v. … Here we agree with the Board that a 34% variation is not de minimis as a matter of law. In Andreucci v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • W.L. Ives, M.D. v. BPOA, State Board of Medicine

    204 A.3d 564 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 2019

    Virgo v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (County of Lehigh- Cedarbrook), 890 A.2d 13, 20 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005). … Readinger v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Epler Masonry), 855 A.2d 952, 956 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004) (citing PA. R.E. 703).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Board of Commissioners

    58 Pa. Commw. 206 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 2, 1981

    Phillips wrote to the Board of Commissioners as follows: Gentlemen: I am requesting a rezoning of the property located on the San Souci Highway, which was recently purchased from Mark Realty. … Warren v. Supervisors of McKean Township, 17 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 421, 423 , 333 A.2d 237, 238 (1975); Clover Hill Farms, Inc. v. Lehigh Township Board of Supervisors, 5 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 239 , 289 A.2d 778 (1972).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCarron v. Zoning Hearing Board

    53 Pa. Commw. 16 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 11, 1980

    McCarron v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lansdale, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 309, 389 A.2d 3227 (1978). See, e.g., Stefonick v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lansdale, 47 Pa. … Commonwealth Ct. 580 , 409 A.2d 463 (1979) ; Township of Salisbury v. Rummel, 44 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 581 , 406 A.2d 808 (1979); Schaff v. Zoning Hearing Board of Edinboro, 22 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Swif v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    833 A.2d 343 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 2003

    Morris Painting, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Piotrowski), 814 A.2d 879 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003). … Co. v. Ins. Comm’r of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 525 Pa. 306 , 580 A.2d 300 (1990).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.