Case law

Hellam Township v. Hellam Township Zoning Hearing Board

941 A.2d 746 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 2008

Nowak v. Bridgeville Borough Zoning Hearing Board, 111 Pa. Cmwlth. 470, 534 A.2d 165 (1987). … Carman v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia, 162 Pa.Cmwlth. 80 , 638 A.2d 365 (1994).

McQuilken v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Prudential)

770 A.2d 376 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 30, 2001

Claimant appealed to the Board, which cited our decision in Frontini v. … Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Petrisek), 537 Pa. 32 , 640 A.2d 1266 (1994). 3 .

Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board

104 Pa. Commw. 7 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 12, 1987

S. §704; Estate of McGovern v. State Employees’ Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377 , 517 A.2d 523 (1986). … Workmens Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Company, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 456 , 342 A. 2d 439 (1975).

Allen v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

93 Pa. Commw. 390 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1985

Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 36 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 304 , 387 A.2d 998 (1978). … Smith v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 81 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 131 , 473 A.2d 235 (1984).

Biggs v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

66 Pa. Commw. 117 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1982

Sisack v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 54 Pa. … See Spare v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 570, 574 , 432 A.2d 283, 285 (1981). In Jones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 30 Pa.

Borough of Beaver v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

810 A.2d 713 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2002

(citing Wilson v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Aluminum Co. of America), 542 Pa. 614 , 669 A.2d 338 (1996)). Moreover, in US Airways v. … Romanies v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Borough of Leesport), 537 Pa. 440 , 644 A.2d 1164 (1994).

County of Washington v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

26 Pa. Commw. 315 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 1976

Opinion by President Judge Bowman, In Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 12 Pa. … On appeal, Sweet v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 457 Pa. 456 , 322 A.2d 362 (1974), the Supreme Court reversed this Court.

Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Thornburgh

85 Pa. Commw. 267 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1984

Instead, the Chairman of the Board, after conferring with a Board member and the Chief Counsel, advised the .Secretary of Administration that the Board would institute legal action unless he removed the freeze. … Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Thornburgh (No. 282 C.D. 1984, filed February 8, 1984), slip op. at 3 (footnote omitted).

Rite Aid Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

112 Pa. Commw. 548 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1988

Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (John Wanamaker, Inc.), 502 Pa. 178 , 465 A.2d 969 (1983). … In Busche v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Townsend and Bottum, Inc.), 77 Pa.

Washington v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

25 Pa. Commw. 152 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1976

Opinion by President Judge Bowman, This is an appeal by Dennis Washington from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, dated October 17, 1975, in which the Board affirmed a referee’s denial of benefits … The Board’s adjudication specifically recites that this statement was not considered by the Board in its weighing of the evidence.

American Road Lines v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (ROYAL)

39 A.3d 603 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 23, 2012

Diehl v. Keystone Alloys Co., 398 Pa. 56, 59 , 156 A.2d 818, 820 (1959). Both the WCJ and the Board found Claimant met her burden of proof. We agree. … See Hatter v.

Duquesne Light Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

97 Pa. Commw. 13 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1986

Borovich v. Colt Industries, 492 Pa. 372 , 424 A.2d 1237 (1981). We do not believe, therefore, that any error occurred. … It is fundamental that the Act, being remedial in nature, must receive a liberal construction in favor of the employee, Papernik v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 42 Pa.

Albater v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

55 Pa. Commw. 390 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1980

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Dixon, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 8, 11 , 365 A.2d 668, 669 (1976). In Dixon , an assistant machine operator had concealed a prior arrest on an unspecified charge. … In Barnett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 47 Pa.

Empire Intimates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

655 A.2d 662 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1995

Blackwell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 124 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 9, 555 A.2d 279 (1989). … Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 378 A.2d 829 (1977).

Diehl v. Zoning Hearing Board

66 Pa. Commw. 100 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1982

The Diehls appealed the Zoning Hearing Board’s decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County raising, in addition to asserted errors of the Zoning Hearing Board, questions as to the constitutionality of the zoning … Backenstoe in an opinion supporting the action of the court affirming the Zoning Hearing Board’s decisions. We affirm the order here appealed on Judge Backenstoe's opinion filed in the court below, Diehl v.

Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

70 Pa. Commw. 6 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1982

Unquestionably, the referee as the fact-finder had to make the decision and the Board did not err in adopting it. City of Scranton Fire Department v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 43 Pa. … In Grasha v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 51 Pa.

Exide Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Kamenas)

653 A.2d 50 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 1994

Employer argues that this court’s decision in Borough of Midland v. … In the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lane Enterprises, Inc. v.

Gavin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

29 Pa. Commw. 634 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1977

Gavin (Appellant) from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which held him ineligible for benefits under several sections of the Unemployment Compensation Law 1 (Act). … Unlike the Board in its brief to this Court, we will not characterize Appellant’s decision to sacrifice a $15,600 per year job over $38 as unreasonable.

Field v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

29 Pa. Commw. 444 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1977

Accordingly, we will enter the following ■ Order Now, March 29, 1977, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Number B-130519, dated March 24, 1976, is affirmed.

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Soloff

24 Pa. Commw. 92 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1976

. §802 (e), for reasons of wilful misconduct connected with his work, and he concedes that if the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Board) findings of fact are supported *94 by substantial evidence, a denial of … Where both the Board and Appellant agree that a remand is necessary, we will enter the foll0W¡W ORDER And Now, this 17th day of March, 1976, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is hereby vacated and