Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

2.00s

  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Erb

    25 Pa. Commw. 425 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 8, 1976

    The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review remanded for an additional hearing, after which it affirmed the decision of the referee denying benefits. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Houp, 20 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 111 , 340 A.2d 588 (1975).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Person v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    701 A.2d 1381 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1997

    Commonwealth v. Jacobs, 433 Pa.Superior Ct. 411, 640 A.2d 1326 (1994), appeal denied, 542 Pa. 661 , 668 A.2d 1125 (1995). A parolee is not entitled to the same rights as an unconvicted citizen. Morrissey v. … This Court *1382 will interfere with the Board's exercise of administrative discretion where it has been abused or exercised in an arbitrary or capricious manner. Green v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harrisburg Housing Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    14 Pa. Commw. 413 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1974

    The Workmen’s *415 Compensation Appeal Board affirmed the referee’s determination and this appeal followed. Our scope of review in this case is limited. As stated by Judge Blatt in Leipziger v. … Hershey Estates v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 470, 472 , 308 A. 2d 637, 638 (1973).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    50 Pa. Commw. 569 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1980

    We had previously reached a similar result in Heisterkamp v. Zoning Hearing Board, 34 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 539 , 383 A.2d 1311 (1978). … In addition, we have previously held in Limekiln Golf Course, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 1 Pa.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Yazevac v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    60 Pa. Commw. 90 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 18, 1981

    Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 474 Pa. 351 , 378 A.2d 829 (1977). … Ruckstuhl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 57 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 302 , 426 A.2d 719 (1981).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Western Packers, Inc.

    22 Pa. Commw. 598 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1976

    As we recently said in Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board v. Young, 18 Pa. … Brown, that the trauma and the hospitalization associated therewith could have caused the ulcer to bleed. Dr. Brown concurred in Dr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Duquesne Light Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

    10 Pa. Commw. 41 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1973

    This Court so held in the case of Heller v. DePuy, 2 Pa. … Our Supreme Court recently (July 2, 1973) in Alco Parking Corporation v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Tri-Union Express v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    703 A.2d 558 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1997

    Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wolfe), 539 Pa. 322 , 652 A.2d 797 (1995). … Nevin Trucking v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Murdock), 667 A.2d 262 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995).

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    12 Pa. Commw. 502 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1974

    Opinion by Judge Kramer, This is an appeal filed by Ingersoll-Band Company (Ingersoll-Band) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) dated July 19, 1973, in -which the Board affirmed the referee’s … We there quoted Wolsko v. American Bridge Company, 158 Pa.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hodge v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    735 A.2d 758 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 1999

    Citing Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 186 Pa.Super. 142 , 141 A.2d 410 (1958) and Kozlowski v. … Rossi v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Bd. of Review, 544 Pa. 261, 267 , 676 A.2d 194, 197 (1996). 2 . In Rue v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Zeiders v. Zoning Hearing Board of Adjustment

    39 Pa. Commw. 645 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1979

    See Rothrock v. Zoning Hearing Board, 13 Pa. … See, e.g., Hanna v. Board of Adjustment, 408 Pa. 306 , 183 A.2d 539 (1962).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    998 A.2d 1030 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 2010

    Sell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (LNP Eng’g), 565 Pa. 114, 122 , 771 A.2d 1246, 1250 (2001). … Consolidation Coal Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Mountain), 47 Pa.Cmwlth. 64 , 407 A.2d 134, 137 (1979); see also Bailey v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Pittsburgh Tube Co.), 96 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Riojas v. Board of Licenses & Inspections Review

    26 Pa. Commw. 625 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1976

    affirming the Board’s decision which supported the action of the Department. … DePaul v. Kauffman, 441 Pa. 386 , 372 A.2d 500 (1971). The City of Philadelphia considers each inspection and each dwelling unit by itself. 2 There is no error in so doing.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    69 Pa. Commw. 201 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1982

    See Richard v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 491 Pa. 162 , 420 A.2d 391 (1980). … Boob v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 18 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 624 , 337 A.2d 293 (1975).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Fekos Enterprises v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    776 A.2d 1018 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 3, 2001

    The referee made findings of fact reiterating Sciaretta’s complaints, which were affirmed by the Board. Since the findings are supported by substantial evidence, they are conclusive. Id. In Emgee Engineering v. … Accordingly, there is ample basis for the Board’s conclusion that Wood-son did not quit, but was dismissed. See Ryan v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Thomas Lindstrom Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    992 A.2d 961 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2010

    The Board relied upon this Court’s decision in Gereyes v. … The Board noted that in Mahon v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Sigafoos v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    94 Pa. Commw. 454 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 30, 1986

    S. §704; Cox v. Board of Probation and Parole, 507 Pa. 614 , 493 A.2d 680 (1985). … The Board’s action in revoking Zimmerman’s parole was proper although the Board did not establish that his conduct was intentional. Id. at 285 , 476 A.2d at 1018 . See also Hawkins v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Economy Decorators, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    96 Pa. Commw. 208 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1986

    Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Smith), 70 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 100 , 452 A.2d 611 (1982); Carpentertown Coal and Coke Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board 52 Pa. … Penn Pad Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Altholz), 83 Pa.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Resnick v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    58 Pa. Commw. 504 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1981

    See Orloski v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. Commonwealth Ct. , 415 A.2d 720 (1980); Kostik v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 32 , 315 A.2d 308 (1974). … However, the drawing of inferences is for the compensation authorities, Tuono v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 54 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Utility Constructors, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    80 Pa. Commw. 477 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1984

    is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County which sustained *478 an appeal from a denial of a special exception request which Utility Constructors, Inc., had filed with the Zoning Hearing Board … common pleas correctly resolved these issues, we shall affirm on the basis of the able and comprehensive opinion of President Judge Richard Thomas of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County in Utility Constructors, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.