Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspacommwct

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Frankford Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    150 Pa. Commw. 532 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1992

    Beebe v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Bendix Corp.), 112 Pa.Cmwlth.Ct. 578, 535 A.2d 1236 (1988). … See Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Vepco Construction Co.), 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vandermark v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    685 A.2d 628 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1996

    Epps v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 129 Pa.Cmwlth. 240 , 565 A.2d 214 (1989). … Hont; see also Wesley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 150 Pa. Cmwlth. 54, 614 A.2d 355 (1992).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Selby

    25 Pa. Commw. 273 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1976

    California Department of Human Resources Development v. Java, 402 U.S. 121 (1971). … See Cooper v. Laupheimer, 316 F. Supp. 264 (W.D. Pa. 1970); accord, Bradford v. Juras, 331 F. Supp. 167 (D. Or. 1971).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Calantoni v. Williams Township Zoning Hearing Board

    985 A.2d 308 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 2009

    985 A.2d 308 (2009) CALANTONI v. WILLIAMS TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD. No. 325CD09. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. December 15, 2009. Decision Without Published Opinion Reversed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ronald H. Brown Charter School v. Harrisburg City School District

    928 A.2d 1145 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 5, 2007

    In DiGiacinto v. … Stoltz v. McConnon, 473 Pa. 157 , 373 A.2d 1096 (1977); *1148 Munce v. O’Hara, 340 Pa. 209 , 16 A.2d 532 (1940); see also Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Zimmerman v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Burchell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    848 A.2d 1082 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 2004

    Burchell next argues that the Board erred in excluding evidence that employer failed to enforce its rules consistently. Burchell relies on this court’s decision in City of Beaver Falls v. Unemployment Comp. … Denardis v. Unemployment Comp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Griffin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    756 A.2d 1203 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2000

    Dist. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Peyser), 136 Pa.Cmwlth. 110 , 582 A.2d 423 (1990)). … Steel Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 62 Pa.Cmwlth. 502 , 437 A.2d 92 (1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Textron, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    105 Pa. Commw. 273 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1987

    Memorial Osteopathic Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 77 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 518 , 466 A.2d 741 (1983). … See Thomas v. Unemployment Compensation Appeal Board, 55 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 449 , 423 A.2d 784 (1980).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hayes v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    660 A.2d 691 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 14, 1995

    Feilke v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 167 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 381, 648 A.2d 121 (1994). … Analogously, in Commonwealth v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • County of Allegheny v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    875 A.2d 1222 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 6, 2005

    Bloom v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Keystone Pretzel Bakery), 677 A.2d 1314 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). … Maroski v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Bethlehem Steel Corp.), 725 A.2d 1260 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999); Florence Mining Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (McGinnis), 691 A.2d 984 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Nevarre v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    675 A.2d 361 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1996

    Ford v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 48 Pa.Cmwlth. 580 , 409 A.2d 1209, 1211 (1980). We also note that, while there is little precedent at all in the Commonwealth on TAA, as opposed to TRA, Wilson v. … See Marshall v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. DiMarco

    24 Pa. Commw. 328 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1976

    Opinion by Judge Crumlish, Jr., Elba DiMarco (Claimant) appeals the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review’s (Board) order affirming the referee’s decision and order denying her benefits on the basis of voluntarily leaving … A denial of benefits pursuant to Section 402(b) (1) is not legally justified by the record and as such, we must Order And Now, this 13th day of April, 1976, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is hereby

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • F. Brown, aka F. Heffelfinger, Jr. v. Tioga Twp. ZHB

    Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 8, 2019

    IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Fred Brown, aka Fred : Heffelfinger, Jr., : Appellant : : … COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Fred Brown, aka Fred : Heffelfinger, Jr., : Appellant : : v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ludwig v. ROSS TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD

    964 A.2d 985 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2009

    964 A.2d 985 (2009) LUDWIG v. ROSS TOWNSHIP ZONING HEARING BOARD. No. 378CD08. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. February 6, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Vacated and Remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Board

    57 Pa. Commw. 135 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 24, 1980

    In Harvey v. … Bowers v. State Employes’ Retirement Board, 29 Pa. *141 Commonwealth Ct. 561 , 871 A.2d 1040 (1977).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Garvin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    18 Pa. Commw. 96 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1975

    This ineligibility has been declared by the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee, and the Board of Review after they had the benefit of a hearing before an appeals referee who took testimony and the Board made its own … The Board’s findings were substantially the same as the findings of the original referee. We must affirm.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • King v. Perkasie Borough Zoning Hearing Board

    122 Pa. Commw. 510 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1989

    (Appellant) appeals the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County which affirmed the order of the Perkasie Borough Zoning Hearing Board (Board). … McCracken v. City of Philadelphia, 69 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 492 , 451 A.2d 1046 (1982). The Boards finding that Appellant already enjoyed two connections to the public road system is supported by substantial evidence.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hanlen v. State College Zoning Hearing Board

    60 Pa. Commw. 190 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1981

    Monumental Properties, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, Township of Whitehall, 11 Pa. … And, unfortunately, we must hold here that the Board has not made sufficient findings of fact to allow us to determine whether or not the standards laid out in Gulf Oil Gorp. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    989 A.2d 936 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 24, 2010

    Saunders v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 130 Pa.Cmwlth. 612 , 568 A.2d 1370, 1371 (1990). The Board must provide parolee a revocation hearing within a reasonable time. Andrews v. … In Jones v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Act I, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    704 A.2d 732 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 24, 1997

    Bray v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa.Cmwlth. 523 , 410 A.2d 909 (1980). … Teazers, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Philadelphia, 682 A.2d 856 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). .

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.